• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What they mean when they say women's rights..

Only thing that video did is pluck some rando preacher no one ever heard of out of obscurity and make him famous.
 
Oh he is actually in the news fairly often for his rants. He is one hateful s.o.b.
 


Two things:
1. The fact that there are deranged assholes who think like this guy doesn't mean that very many people who matter are opposed to women's rights.
2. The fact that there are deranged assholes who think like this guy is not a good reason not to believe.
3. The total lack of meaningful evidence for the truth of Christianity, on the other hand, is an excellent reason not to believe.
 
Gosh I wonder why people are leaving Christianity in droves...



The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
 
I don't see or hear anything. Most likely some male hating group that doesn't like something a man said. So, all men are bad. According to Chucky Shumer, women aren't women anymore. They are "Persons."
Oh, you'd LOVE this guy, Grasshopper. He wants Gays lynched, Muslims deported (or killed, depending on his mood), women afforded the status of cattle, and the nation turned into a theocracy.

He's basically like the Ayatollahs, but in a cheap suit.
 
Oh, you'd LOVE this guy, Grasshopper. He wants Gays lynched, Muslims deported (or killed, depending on his mood), women afforded the status of cattle, and the nation turned into a theocracy.

He's basically like the Ayatollahs, but in a cheap suit.
Still defending Muslims throwing gays off of rooftops headfirst?
 
Oh, you'd LOVE this guy, Grasshopper. He wants Gays lynched, Muslims deported (or killed, depending on his mood), women afforded the status of cattle, and the nation turned into a theocracy.

He's basically like the Ayatollahs, but in a cheap suit.
What guy? No, I would not. I've never said gays should be lynched. That would be murder like abortion on demand. Muslims haven't hurt me. Have they hurt you? No one is advocating for your poor perception of the abortion topic. You are making all this up in your head.
 
What guy? No, I would not. I've never said gays should be lynched. That would be murder like abortion on demand. Muslims haven't hurt me. Have they hurt you? No one is advocating for your poor perception of the abortion topic. You are making all this up in your head.

So the moment that a woman conceives, you demand that she then carry that little bitty zygote about as big as the period at the end of this sentence to term?
 
So the moment that a woman conceives, you demand that she then carry that little bitty zygote about as big as the period at the end of this sentence to term?
Yep. That's the risk she takes for having sex. See, I'm for pro-choice. Just not at the same point in the process that you are. She has a choice and if she doesn't want to be inconvenienced with a baby then she should lock herself at the knees and remain celibate. That's her choice and where it is appropriately made. Not after intercourse. Too late. The choice has been made.
 
Yep. That's the risk she takes for having sex. See, I'm for pro-choice. Just not at the same point in the process that you are. She has a choice and if she doesn't want to be inconvenienced with a baby then she should lock herself at the knees and remain celibate. That's her choice and where it is appropriately made. Not after intercourse. Too late. The choice has been made.

What a ridiculous claim, a total misunderstanding of human nature. If a woman experiences an unwanted pregnancy, then arrogant people like yourself get to demand that she carry to term. I have no idea why you think that YOU and others like you should get to make such demands. Who gets to make demands to step in when you make personal decisions. This is authoritarian state fascism at its worse.
 
Yep. That's the risk she takes for having sex. See, I'm for pro-choice. Just not at the same point in the process that you are. She has a choice and if she doesn't want to be inconvenienced with a baby then she should lock herself at the knees and remain celibate. That's her choice and where it is appropriately made. Not after intercourse. Too late. The choice has been made.

This is why I am absolutely against religion. Things like this post.
 
Yep. That's the risk she takes for having sex. See, I'm for pro-choice. Just not at the same point in the process that you are. She has a choice and if she doesn't want to be inconvenienced with a baby then she should lock herself at the knees and remain celibate. That's her choice and where it is appropriately made. Not after intercourse. Too late. The choice has been made.
1652588130157.png
 
Yep. That's the risk she takes for having sex. See, I'm for pro-choice. Just not at the same point in the process that you are. She has a choice and if she doesn't want to be inconvenienced with a baby then she should lock herself at the knees and remain celibate. That's her choice and where it is appropriately made. Not after intercourse. Too late. The choice has been made.

The man has an equally important choice, if not more so.
 
Gosh I wonder why people are leaving Christianity in droves...
Liberals are mostly history challenged, as evidenced by how many times socialism has failed and they still think it works.

They also don't want any moral frameworks that might cramp their unbiblical lifestyles.

I've yet to meet a liberal who didn't in some way screw up the historical and Biblical Jesus of the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John).
 
3. The total lack of meaningful evidence for the truth of Christianity, on the other hand, is an excellent reason not to believe.

You must not have done your homework, Tirmin. So here's a challenge for you:

Show me your BEST ONE EXAMPLE ( 1 - JUST ONE - YOUR BEST 1 ) of a fictitious person, place, or event in the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John). PERSON, PLACE OR EVENT. Cite the pertinent scripture(s) and make your case with some kind of evidence or substantiation why it's fictitious. Please follow the instructions above.

Let's see that bad boy.
 
Back
Top Bottom