• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is God's Name

They removed God's name in all early versions apart from one or two instances....

So perhaps mainstream Christian thought doesn't want to know God's name, but once it did (at least those who followed the KJ version).
The origin of such a superstition began early on...

At the Root of the Controversy

According to the Bible, God himself revealed his name to humankind. (Exodus 3:15) Scriptural evidence shows that God’s ancient servants freely used that name. (Genesis 12:8; Ruth 2:4) God’s name was known by other nations as well. (Joshua 2:9) This was especially true after the Jews who had returned from exile in Babylon came into contact with peoples of many nations. (Psalm 96:2-10; Isaiah 12:4; Malachi 1:11) The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible says: “There is considerable evidence that in the postexilic period many foreigners were attracted to the religion of the Jews.” However, by the first century C.E., a superstition about God’s name had developed. Eventually, not only did the Jewish nation stop using God’s name openly but some even forbade pronouncing it at all. Its correct pronunciation was thus lost—or was it?

https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1999088?q=superstition+about+god's+name&p=sen
 
Our Readers Ask

Why Use God’s Name if Its Pronunciation Is Uncertain?


No one today knows exactly how God’s name was pronounced in ancient Hebrew. Significantly, however, God’s personal name appears in the text of the Bible some 7,000 times. Jesus made God’s name manifest when on earth, and he instructed his disciples to pray for the sanctification of that name. (Matthew 6:9; John 17:6) Thus, one thing is certain—the use of God’s name is of utmost importance to Christian faith. Why, then, is the original pronunciation of that name uncertain today? There are two main reasons.

First, some two thousand years ago, there arose among the Jews a superstitious tradition that it was wrong to pronounce God’s name. When a reader came to the name in Bible text, he would say the word “Lord” as a substitute. In this way, after many centuries of disuse, the pronunciation of God’s name faded from memory.

Second, ancient Hebrew was written without vowels, very similar to abbreviations in English and other languages. When reading the written text, the reader supplied the missing vowel sounds from memory. In time, a system was devised to prevent the pronunciation of Hebrew words from being completely forgotten. Vowel points were added to each word in the Hebrew Bible. For the divine name, however, either the vowel points for “Lord” were added to remind the reader to pronounce the substitute word, or none were added at all.

What survived, then, were the four consonants called the Tetragrammaton, which one dictionary defines as “the four Hebrew letters usu[ally] transliterated YHWH or JHVH that form a biblical proper name of God.” It is easy to see how JHVH, with vowel points and vowel sounds added, becomes “Jehovah,” the form that is most familiar and widely accepted in English.

Some scholars, though, recommend the pronunciation “Yahweh.” Is that closer to the original pronunciation? No one can be certain. Actually, other scholars have cited reasons for not using this pronunciation. Of course, Bible names, when spoken in a modern-day language, probably sound nothing like the original Hebrew, and hardly anyone objects. This is because these names have become part of our language and they are easily recognized. So it is with the name Jehovah.

The first-century Christians were called a people for God’s name. They preached about the name to others and encouraged them to call upon it. (Acts 2:21; 15:14; Romans 10:13-15) Clearly, it is important to God that we use his name in whatever language we speak, appreciate its significance, and live in harmony with what it stands for.

https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2008649
 
Explain how

After you've explained why it's ironic....and demonstrated that you know what irony means.

Funny how you demand explanations for others' posts, but offer none yourself. If you explain your comment, perhaps I'll explain mine. Throw in a good basis for me to believe that you have anything other than a pseudo-intellectual understanding of what "irony" is and it's practically guaranteed.
 
Then can you explain the existence of other gods and their names ?

Zeus, Apollo, Ra, Isis, Osiris....

What made the Israelites more fearful of curses do you think ?
No idea.
 
Funny how you demand explanations for others' posts, but offer none yourself.

Funny that you cannot explain your comments regarding this thread being a "wind-up" or how it could be seen as ironic

Or even demonstrate that you know the meaning of the word.


Actually it's not funny/strange at all, it's entirely expected of you and your posts.
 
It is equally superstitious to think that God has a certain name and is hurt if it isn't used..
Surely god is more worried these days about his creatures using the proper pronouns?
 
Funny that you cannot explain your comments regarding this thread being a "wind-up" or how it could be seen as ironic

Or even demonstrate that you know the meaning of the word.


Actually it's not funny/strange at all, it's entirely expected of you and your posts.

So, not only subject to unintentional irony, but a huge double standard as well. Duly noted.
 
The OP asks the name of the Christian god under the apparent assumption that there are no other gods. It does not ask the name of gods of other religions or beliefs. The premise then is that any name that is not of Judeo-Christian faith is incorrect.
 
Surely god is more worried these days about his creatures using the proper pronouns?

God must really be stressed out with all this important stuff to worry about.
 
The OP asks the name of the Christian god under the apparent assumption that there are no other gods. It does not ask the name of gods of other religions or beliefs. The premise then is that any name that is not of Judeo-Christian faith is incorrect.
Well, Paul as much as says there are and one great advantage of using the name of the true God is that it keeps Him separate from all the false gods...

"For even though there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth,+ just as there are many “gods” and many “lords, there is actually to us one God,+ the Father,+ from whom all things are” 1 Corinthians 8:5:6
 
IDK, maybe because it purports to be the word of God ?
As do many ancient texts with origin stories. But even beyond that, why assume that god needs a name, or has a name? Assuming that god even has a name is just another way of anthropomorphizing the Divine. Does the wish to name god come from the need to distinguish god from Zeus? Or Odin? It would seem to be a very insecure pursuit to undertake at the outset.
 
God must really be stressed out with all this important stuff to worry about.
Indeed. It's enough to give god a rash.


((that's me anthropomorphizing god - 8~)> ))
 
Last edited:
Well, Paul as much as says there are and one great advantage of using the name of the true God is that it keeps Him separate from all the false gods...

"For even though there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth,+ just as there are many “gods” and many “lords, there is actually to us one God,+ the Father,+ from whom all things are” 1 Corinthians 8:5:6

With respect, thank you, Elvira. While my perspective is different I recognize your Christian response.
 
Well, Paul as much as says there are and one great advantage of using the name of the true God is that it keeps Him separate from all the false gods...

"For even though there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth,+ just as there are many “gods” and many “lords, there is actually to us one God,+ the Father,+ from whom all things are” 1 Corinthians 8:5:6

No, Paul does not say anything even hinting at calling God a particular name in that quote. You are reading into it. All he is stating is his claim of the Christian belief in one God.
 
No, Paul does not say anything even hinting at calling God a particular name in that quote. You are reading into it. All he is stating is his claim of the Christian belief in one God.
There you go again with that reading comprehension problem...that is not what I said...
 
There you go again with that reading comprehension problem...that is not what I said...

You quoted the bible as if it supported your point that god wants to be called a certain name. It did not support it. So apparently the reading comprehension problem belongs to you.
 
You quoted the bible as if it supported your point that god wants to be called a certain name. It did not support it. So apparently the reading comprehension problem belongs to you.
I did not...
 
Well, Paul as much as says there are and one great advantage of using the name of the true God is that it keeps Him separate from all the false gods...

"For even though there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth,+ just as there are many “gods” and many “lords, there is actually to us one God,+ the Father,+ from whom all things are” 1 Corinthians 8:5:6

I did not...

But you did. You used the quote to specifically back your claim that god has a particular name.
 
Back
Top Bottom