• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was there a vast conspiracy to dethrone Trump?

Well, the Swamp is back in charge now. Enjoy your measly $600.
Blame Mitch and his cheapskate GOP clan. They wanted 0$ checks. The Dems held out and got half of what they asked for. They promise it won't be the last check too but if Mitch stays in control they will not be able to keep it. You better prey the Dems win in Georgia if you want a faster recovery from the covid recession double dip.
 
Oh, the media. I swear you don't want a balanced media because whenever it's bad news for a Republican you can hear the whining from space.

Seriously, you guys will buy any theory that makes you the victim and if it isn't real, you'll make it up anyway.

Which of these court decisions had Anderson Cooper sitting on the bench?
What balanced media? They are "balanced" to the left.





 
What balanced media? They are "balanced" to the left.





If they slant left it is because that is what the people want. The media gives the people what it wants. That's how it makes money
 
Dethrone? Was he elected to be a king? Did I miss something?
 
What balanced media? They are "balanced" to the left.






I didn't say it was, I said you don't want that. You want them all to be Fox.
 
If they slant left it is because that is what the people want. The media gives the people what it wants. That's how it makes money

No!

It represents change of ownership
Too few controlling to much of the News media.
A true monopoly, not the game.
And "they" have a political agenda.



Media.webp
 
No!

It represents change of ownership
Too few controlling to much of the News media.
A true monopoly, not the game.
And "they" have a political agenda.



Why are the right so weak and powerless in owning media outlets?


Face it...they give the people what they want to get ratings and make money
 

With those facts in evidence, they should have had NO difficulty presenting evidence to a large group of sympathetic Republican judges, and to a SCOTUS with a Trump friendly majority. In addition, with a vast network of Republican friendly law enforcement, it should have been a slam dunk collecting this and even more evidence.
And yet, somehow, when it came time for Trump to use the best and brightest, all he had was sweaty Rudy and the soon to be disbarred Sidney Powell, and a drunken Victoria Jackson impersonator.

If ever there was an opportunity to scream "conspiracy", I'd be pointing my CT flashlight at those three and asking myself why THEY screwed the pooch, except for one problem: They did get their audience with the courts, FIFTY OF THEM.

Not ONCE did they present ANY of the above from your "Kon-stuh-tewshinul" patriot buddy.
If I was a bleeping moron, I'd be endlessly fascinated by that.
 
I wonder what the number would have been without the voter suppression efforts in places likes Texas (one drop box, removing polling places, voter purges, etc)

That number would have been YUGE.

Sarah Palin HUGE.webp
 
Basically, was there a vast conspiracy against Trump? Involving all the election officials and judges? Republicans and Democrats?

Dethrone?
First time I've ever seen a non-Trumper use that term.
But it makes perfect sense because Trump sees himself AS a king.
Only kings get dethroned, but the difference is, few kings keep their heads in the process.
America, what a country!

16XK.gif
 
Why are the right so weak and powerless in owning media outlets?


Face it...they give the people what they want to get ratings and make money

In the ole days of Walter Cronkite there was this concept of journalism.
Impartiality. Objectivity. The journalism promoted by Edward R. Morrow
News departments were a separate entity not on the corporate charts.
Now GWTW
I miss the 5 W's and an H in the first paragraph style.
Who What What Where When How


BTW I believe Al Jazeera was closest to it after the Arab Spring
Their specials made critics invoke Morrow's work like "Harvest of Shame".


:( I no longer have access to RT nor Al Jazeera via my cable TV.
Whose fault is that do you suppose?


Moi
Just because I'm a conspiracist
doesn't mean it isn't



BTW do YOU ever look at any Not Western News media?
They do cover stories ignored by the West
like the oopsy of bombing Doctors Without Borders.
A story not reported in the West for weeks after others reported it.



AmericanPravda.png
ABC = CBS = NBC = Fox = BBC = PBS
Get It Or Not

 
In the ole days of Walter Cronkite there was this concept of journalism.
Impartiality. Objectivity. The journalism promoted by Edward R. Morrow
News departments were a separate entity not on the corporate charts.
Now GWTW
I miss the 5 W's and an H in the first paragraph style.
Who What What Where When How


BTW I believe Al Jazeera was closest to it after the Arab Spring
Their specials made critics invoke Morrow's work like "Harvest of Shame".


:( I no longer have access to RT nor Al Jazeera via my cable TV.
Whose fault is that do you suppose?


Moi
Just because I'm a conspiracist
doesn't mean it isn't



BTW do YOU ever look at any Not Western News media?
They do cover stories ignored by the West
like the oopsy of bombing Doctors Without Borders.
A story not reported in the West for weeks after others reported it.



View attachment 67310285
ABC = CBS = NBC = Fox = BBC = PBS
Get It Or Not

If the media is biased it is because that is what the public wants


The media is not red or blue.....irs green
 
If the media is biased it is because that is what the public wants


The media is not red or blue.....irs green

Public has no choice today.
Comprende monopoly?
 
Public has no choice today.
Comprende monopoly?
Monopoly implies no conservatives are allowed to own a media outlet.



They are just weak and powerless because they choose to be


If ABC or any outlet thought it could make more money with a different slant THEY WOUKD DO THAT TOMORROW


This is capitalism. This is what the people want
 
Was there a "vast conspiracy to 'dethrone' Trump?"

IMO? Yes.

But it did not involve "all the election officials and judges." No.

IMO it did involve some Democrats and a few Republicans, and some election officials and partisan judges especially in a few key States.

But IMO it was mainly fostered by a combine of globalist interests. This would include the big multinational tech and industrial interests who control the bulk of media/information services, the members of the government "swamp" who owe their continued political power to the financial resources of those interests, and a bit of help from China and perhaps even Russia.

That is clearly evidenced in how the MSM, Social Media, Information Media (Google, etc.) and both the Democrats and those "Lincoln" Republicans have acted throughout the 4 years preceding the elections. Right up to using Covid-19 as the excuse to rush through mass-mail voting (not to be confused with existing absentee balloting) which even the Democrats used to admit was the least secure, most open to fraud method for voting.

So under those points I would vote "yes," if there were an actual poll.
The only thing you mentioned that the "conspirators" actually did was push mail-in voting. But without stating that it was fraudulent and how the fraud operated, how did this lead to your yes vote for the "vast conspiracy" side of the question? Biden was consistently ahead in the polls. Biden won. Challenges turned aside, often by republican judges. No huge surprise.
 
Blame Mitch and his cheapskate GOP clan. They wanted 0$ checks. The Dems held out and got half of what they asked for. They promise it won't be the last check too but if Mitch stays in control they will not be able to keep it. You better prey the Dems win in Georgia if you want a faster recovery from the covid recession double dip.
You better pray anything comes your way. Trump is the one pushing for $2000. Your Democrats want to send millions in foreign aid to Cambodia and others and give military contractors a windfall. Your precious Dems are part of the Swamp. They don't give a rat's ass about you.
 
Monopoly implies no conservatives are allowed to own a media outlet.



They are just weak and powerless because they choose to be


If ABC or any outlet thought it could make more money with a different slant THEY WOUKD DO THAT TOMORROW


This is capitalism. This is what the people want

We disagree.
Have a nice day
 
The Swamp is back in charge. Just look at the latest Covid relief bill. Most of it to special interests, to the military (ie., that means defense contractors) and even a big chunk as foreign aid. You might get a measly $600..............you're the chump in chump change.
Trump is an uncouth loudmouth, but he is not of either party; he is a populist. And he was our last hope of beating down the establishment. The Swamp won in 2020.
In 2019, we gave foreign aid in the form of almost $50B. Was that not Trump in charge then for some reason? We have given anywhere from mid$20B to $50B every year Trump has been in office. In fact, it appears that we are putting aside/sending out less foreign aid this year than most years (from the info I can find).
 
There was a vast conspiracy by the MSM against Trump for four years. While Democrats and the left also had a vast conspiracy as well, that is called politics. Happened under Obama and it will happen under Biden. But, the MSM have an obligation to be unbiased and fair in their reporting and most of them are Democrats who are totally unable to be unbiased and fair. It's actually quite disgusting that the MSM are allowed to brainwash their viewers.
Telling the truth and speaking out against a corrupt and abusive President is not a conspiracy. That is called calling out someone who should never have been put in charge and who is corrupt.
 
You better pray anything comes your way. Trump is the one pushing for $2000. Your Democrats want to send millions in foreign aid to Cambodia and others and give military contractors a windfall. Your precious Dems are part of the Swamp. They don't give a rat's ass about you.
Brush up on your poly sci. The foreign aid and other items were part of the omnibus spending bill, items Trump himself had proposed. The stimulus bill was attached to it. It's a clever argument by Trump, attacking always-popular-to-attack foreign aid, which in many cases is a subsidy to US business.
 
In 2019, we gave foreign aid in the form of almost $50B. Was that not Trump in charge then for some reason? We have given anywhere from mid$20B to $50B every year Trump has been in office. In fact, it appears that we are putting aside/sending out less foreign aid this year than most years (from the info I can find).
We shouldn't be sending out any foreign aid this year considering we need that money for our own citizens in need.
 
We shouldn't be sending out any foreign aid this year considering we need that money for our own citizens in need.
As I understood it a while ago, a lot of foreign aid goes to US companies. We provide money in the form of loans to buy US products, say tractors perhaps. Countries pay back the loans with interest, though as I recall the rates are low. The joke used to be that the check never leaves the US. So foreign aid rebounds to benefit US citizens.

That is to be distinguished from relief given during disasters and other events.
 
It was a conspiracy all right, 80 million of us conspired to take the dumb SOB down and we succeeded.
 
As I understood it a while ago, a lot of foreign aid goes to US companies. We provide money in the form of loans to buy US products, say tractors perhaps. Countries pay back the loans with interest, though as I recall the rates are low. The joke used to be that the check never leaves the US. So foreign aid rebounds to benefit US citizens.

That is to be distinguished from relief given during disasters and other events.
Of course most foreign aid benefits US corporations. That's how the Swamp works. We just shouldn't be doing it this year.
 
Of course most foreign aid benefits US corporations. That's how the Swamp works. We just shouldn't be doing it this year.
I still don't understand why not, if it winds up benefitting US workers.
 
Back
Top Bottom