• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wait A Minute----Where Are The trumpers Now??

No, and no. Gabbard testified that Iran was not in the process of building a nuke. She did not testify that they were not enriching uranium towards that goal. The reality is that Iran has enriched uranium to the 60% level just one quick step from the 87 to 90% level that would enable them to build a nuke.

In your imagination, enriching uranium is NOT an essential part of building a nuke?
What does one use for fissile material in nukes in your world?​
 
They fired missiles at one another twice in Bidens final year in office. Thats when it began. You just refuse to allow anything bad that happens be laid at anyones feet other than Trump.
Well, you'd have to go much further than than that because Israel's been after Iran's nuclear program for decades with all sorts of cover actions in and out of Iran. That's not even including all of the other exchanges they've had in other regional conflicts. The difference this time is this is a prolonged and comprehensive attack by Israel, and this is without precedent even when compared to the 2024 attacks, which were coordinated between the parties on Iran's retaliation. None of that is happening now.
 
In your imagination, enriching uranium is NOT an essential part of building a nuke?
It's a matter of purpose. Iran obviously intends to enrich enough to build nukes. I have never suggested otherwise. I am hoping for a B-2 bombing run to take out Fordow. What are you flying off the handle about?
What does one use for fissile material in nukes in your world?
Perhaps you should cut down on the caffeine.
 
Gabbard testified that Iran was not in the process of building a nuke. She did not testify that they were not enriching uranium towards that goal.

It's a matter of purpose. Iran obviously intends to enrich enough to build nukes.

So, enriching uranium actually IS a part of the process of building nukes?

When "Gabbard testified that Iran was not in the process of building a nuke,"
was Gabbard was too ignorant to know that enriching uranium was a part of the process of building nukes?
 
So, enriching uranium actually IS a part of the process of building nukes?

When "Gabbard testified that Iran was not in the process of building a nuke,"
was Gabbard was too ignorant to know that enriching uranium was a part of the process of building nukes?
I think Gabbard should have checked in with her boss before making such a definitive statement about Iran's bomb-making progress.
"Building a nuke" has many steps involved.
 
So we can agree on something. We both want Trump to succeed in blocking Iran from having a nuclear weapon.
of course.......
Keep in mind, he showed how strong democracy is by winning the presidency without any questions from the opposition.
???? He was not the one to give credit to for making democ. stronger............. The dems did so by NOT challenging and spreading false accusations of a "rigged election"........no one has done more harm to democ. than trump, and this has emboldened our foes tremendously.
 
My thought is we do a couple of B-2 bombing runs on Fordow, and let the IDF handle the rest.

When Iran next retaliates on US soil, it will be in no small part because of these choices Trump has made on our behalf.

Getting manipulated into a war isn't exactly genius leadership, either. Israel is leading him by the nose in this.
 
Why?

WTF does Trump know that the USIC doesn't?




Do you feel the USIC and Gabbard were unaware that the process of building a nuke has many steps?
It's the message that was delivered and quickly transformed by the media into a source of contention between Trump and Gabbard.

We don't know what Trump might know from his advisors.
Care to second guess what Trump knows at this juncture?
 
During The campaign all I heard was how Biden is getting us into war, etc, etc,.......The Trumpers are silent now that trump really IS doing just that !! Come on GOPers----what say you ???


America's Hamas denying that Israel exists, claiming that Trump attacked their ally, Iran...
 
of course.......

???? He was not the one to give credit to for making democ. stronger............. The dems did so by NOT challenging and spreading false accusations of a "rigged election"........no one has done more harm to democ. than trump, and this has emboldened our foes tremendously.
Let's hear it for the Dems who, in the case of the November election, were smart enough to see the election results clearly showed democracy is working and the results were there for everyone to see.

You wrote: "no one has done more harm to democ. than trump, and this has emboldened our foes tremendously."

Another sweeping statement appropriated from the mass media. Why not simply parrot what everyone hears?
"Trump is destroying democracy as we know it."
If you wish to alarm the entire country, then just keep repeating what the Left-leaning media is telling everyone.
 
Do you honestly believe that the Israel Palestine conflict or the conflicts between Israel and Iran BEGAN in the Biden Admin as stated in the post you quote?

afaf

Have you, or ANY of the Comrades here, ever heard of the "Abraham Accords?"

When Trump left office in 2021, there was peace in the middle east. Iran's bought and paid for stooge, Joe Biden, made short work of that...
 
It's the message that was delivered and quickly transformed by the media into a source of contention between Trump and Gabbard.

Do you think USIC and Gabbard were unaware that the process of building a nuke has many steps when they made their assessments?​

afaf

We don't know what Trump might know from his advisors.
Care to second guess what Trump knows at this juncture?

The USIC have some times been called upon to advise the PotUS on matters if security and intelligence.

Does Trump have another secret set of security and intelligence advisors who are better informed than the USIC?
 
When Iran next retaliates on US soil, it will be in no small part because of these choices Trump has made on our behalf.
If Iran retaliates on US soil. The reality is that Iran does not have much left to retaliate with, and to be honest I have doubts that the regime will survive. If you are thinking of sleeper cells, you can blame that on Biden and the democrats facilitating millions of unvetted illegal immigrants, some of which were on terrorist watch lists.
Getting manipulated into a war isn't exactly genius leadership, either. Israel is leading him by the nose in this.
TDS. The reality is that if Israel was leading Trump by the nose, he would have already deployed the B-2 bombing raids on Fordow, rather than giving them 60 days to sign a deal.
 
During The campaign all I heard was how Biden is getting us into war, etc, etc,.......The Trumpers are silent now that trump really IS doing just that !! Come on GOPers----what say you ???
You need bigger and bolder letters in order to impress those in your echo chamber.
Since you don't know how the situation will turn out, wouldn't it be fairer to wait until a decision is made by Trump before you accuse him of going to war with Iran?
But, of course, you want to be the first to say "I told you so" before a decision is even made to use those bunker-busting bombs.
 
Do you think USIC and Gabbard were unaware that the process of building a nuke has many steps when they made their assessments?​

afaf



The USIC have some times been called upon to advise the PotUS on matters if security and intelligence.

Does Trump have another secret set of security and intelligence advisors who are better informed than the USIC?
Is that a rhetorical question or do you really think I might have a real answer to your loaded question?
 
Have you, or ANY of the Comrades here, ever heard of the "Abraham Accords?"
When Trump left office in 2021, there was peace in the middle east. Iran's bought and paid for stooge, Joe Biden, made short work of that...

I hope that believing that the Israel / Palestine issue began in 2021 brings you the comfort you seek.
 
You need bigger and bolder letters in order to impress those in your echo chamber.
Since you don't know how the situation will turn out, wouldn't it be fairer to wait until a decision is made by Trump before you accuse him of going to war with Iran?
But, of course, you want to be the first to say "I told you so" before a decision is even made to use those bunker-busting bombs.

The democrats, America's Hamas, denies that Israel has the right to exist, or in fact DOES exist.,

Hence, they claim the attacks that defeated their ally were done by Emmanuel Goldstein - that is Donald Trump.
 
If Iran retaliates on US soil. The reality is that Iran does not have much left to retaliate with, and to be honest I have doubts that the regime will survive. If you are thinking of sleeper cells, you can blame that on Biden and the democrats facilitating millions of unvetted illegal immigrants, some of which were on terrorist watch lists.

Yes, yes, it's Biden's fault that Iran would retaliate against something Trump did.

Everyone knows that!


TDS. The reality is that if Israel was leading Trump by the nose, he would have already deployed the B-2 bombing raids on Fordow, rather than giving them 60 days to sign a deal.

Trump is leading this? This is all part of his plan from the beginning?
 
Is that a rhetorical question or do you really think I might have a real answer to your loaded question?

I am just wondering if you have figured out why you think

the statement from Gabbard and the USIC that Iran is not engaged in the process of making a nuke

does NOT include enriching uranium

even though you say that enriching uranium is a part of the process of building a nuke.


One possible explanation would be that Gabbard and the USIC were not as aware of the process of building a nuke as you are.

Can you think of any other possible explanations?
 
Sometimes it looks like the US wants to be the only sovereign nation on earth…..
 
Back
Top Bottom