• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:5949][W:1030]***Official January 6 Public Hearings Thread***

Anthony60 said:
A link to me remembering that from prior to the election? I don't think that technology is out yet.
Click to expand...
It's called Google, people use it all the time ,
 
Anthony60 said:
I didn't look it up on Google, but don't let me stop you.
Click to expand...
Anthony60 said:
Trump's culpability? LOL, you must be joking!
Click to expand...

I didn't make the claim and I'm busy googling more about the cabinet members who are going before the grand jury.

Joke's on you.

I noticed you can't name a suspect or specify a crime concerning fraud in the 2020 election.
 
soap box said:
I didn't make the claim and I'm busy googling more about the cabinet members who are going before the grand jury.

Joke's on you.

I noticed you can't name a suspect or specify a crime concerning fraud in the 2020 election.
Click to expand...

I noticed you can't name a suspect or specify a crime concerning Donald Trump, and neither can the so called committee.
 
Anthony60 said:
I noticed you can't name a suspect or specify a crime concerning Donald Trump, and neither can the so called committee.
Click to expand...

The committee already knows there was no fraud. That wasn't what you claimed . You said "whatever they did" but you cannot specify "whatever they did"

I noticed you don't know about any fraud in the 2020 election.
 
soap box said:
The committee already knows there was no fraud. That wasn't what you claimed . You said "whatever they did" but you cannot specify "whatever they did"

I noticed you don't know about any fraud in the 2020 election.
Click to expand...
https://www.theepochtimes.com/kash-...national-guard-days-before-jan-6_4615875.html

In the days leading up to Jan. 6, 2021, President Donald Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guard, but official government documents show Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Washington mayor Muriel Bowser, and the D.C. Capitol Police each declined the offer.


“The fact that President Trump authorized security for the Capitol and he ordered the transition of government—he could legally and factually not have been orchestrating a coup to conduct an insurrection,” says Kash Patel.


Why hasn’t the FBI turned over all documentation related to January 6? Were there undercover government agents in the crowd that day? And why was Trump supporter Rosanne Boyland, who died that day, repeatedly beaten by a Capitol Police officer even while she was unconscious?

Wow!
 
Anthony60 said:
In the days leading up to Jan. 6, 2021, President Donald Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guard, but official government documents show Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Washington mayor Muriel Bowser, and the D.C. Capitol Police each declined the offer.


“The fact that President Trump authorized security for the Capitol and he ordered the transition of government—he could legally and factually not have been orchestrating a coup to conduct an insurrection,” says Kash Patel.


Why hasn’t the FBI turned over all documentation related to January 6? Were there undercover government agents in the crowd that day? And why was Trump supporter Rosanne Boyland, who died that day, repeatedly beaten by a Capitol Police officer even while she was unconscious?

Wow!
Click to expand...
This entire post is BS unsupported by evidence and debunked in the Jan. 6 hearings. FYI re: Boyland: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/15/us/rosanne-boyland-capitol-riot-death.html
 
There simply must be an insane amount of dark money being thrown around buying up officials' assistance and compliance this year.

​
The Department of Homeland Security’s chief watchdog scrapped its investigative team’s effort to collect agency phones to try to recover deleted Secret Service texts this year, according to four people with knowledge of the decision and internal records reviewed by The Washington Post.​
​
In early February, after learning that the Secret Service’s text messages had been erased as part of a migration to new devices, staff at Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari’s office planned to contact all DHS agencies offering to have data specialists help retrieve messages from their phones, according to two government whistleblowers who provided reports to Congress.​
 
Argent said:
This entire post is BS unsupported by evidence and debunked in the Jan. 6 hearings. FYI re: Boyland: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/15/us/rosanne-boyland-capitol-riot-death.html
Click to expand...
Can you imagine if Garland actually tried to bring charges against Trump? Remember, you are getting the cherry picked of the cherry picked from this text altering committee. People testify for hours and hours, and they show you thirty seconds.

The defense witnesses, of which zero exist in the world of the committee hearings, would absolutely slaughter any charges brought against Trump. Garland knows this, and he knows he would look like an absolute fool.
 
Anthony60 said:
Can you imagine if Garland actually tried to bring charges against Trump? Remember, you are getting the cherry picked of the cherry picked from this text altering committee. People testify for hours and hours, and they show you thirty seconds.

The defense witnesses, of which zero exist in the world of the committee hearings, would absolutely slaughter any charges brought against Trump. Garland knows this, and he knows he would look like an absolute fool.
Click to expand...
Is that what you have to tell yourself to feel better?

Because it makes no friggin sense otherwise.
 
Anthony60 said:
The defense witnesses, of which zero exist in the world of the committee hearings, would absolutely slaughter any charges brought against Trump.
Click to expand...
The only defense offered to date (mentioned in the Jan. 6 hearing) is that his groupies were making noise that *Rump fell under the influence of bad advisors. Weak sauce.
 
Threegoofs said:
Is that what you have to tell yourself to feel better?

Because it makes no friggin sense otherwise.
Click to expand...
It makes plenty of sense. Not to a lib, but it still makes sense.

They would have stopped at 20, 30 witnesses and realized there's no crime here, not even close. That's if they were after the truth. But, we know they aren't. Prime time hearings, thousands of witnesses, refusing to release transcripts, cherry picking what they do release... all political.

Of course, the low information types eat it up, they are essential to the existence of the Democrat party.
 
Argent said:
The only defense offered to date (mentioned in the Jan. 6 hearing) is that his groupies were making noise that *Rump fell under the influence of bad advisors. Weak sauce.
Click to expand...
Who? What? Have you been drinking?
 
Anthony60 said:
Can you imagine if Garland actually tried to bring charges against Trump? Remember, you are getting the cherry picked of the cherry picked from this text altering committee. People testify for hours and hours, and they show you thirty seconds.

The defense witnesses, of which zero exist in the world of the committee hearings, would absolutely slaughter any charges brought against Trump. Garland knows this, and he knows he would look like an absolute fool.
Click to expand...
Who would be called as witnesses for the defense? The Kraken? Eastman? Clark? Bannon? Stone? Pence?
 
Argent said:
The only defense offered to date (mentioned in the Jan. 6 hearing) is that his groupies were making noise that *Rump fell under the influence of bad advisors. Weak sauce.
Click to expand...
That's right. They are already backed into that corner.

But in what universe is it any defense that he knowingly did something illegal on bad advice? He can't use his excuse of believing the election was stolen to justify trying to steal it himself.
 
Last edited:
Anthony60 said:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/kash-...national-guard-days-before-jan-6_4615875.html

In the days leading up to Jan. 6, 2021, President Donald Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guard, but official government documents show Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Washington mayor Muriel Bowser, and the D.C. Capitol Police each declined the offer.
Click to expand...

That didn't prevent trump from making a video to send them home when he first returned to the WH about 2pm. Why didn't he stop the riot? Because he wanted the riot. They needed the delay to stop the count. Pence made the call for mobilization, trump did nothing. When Milley wanted to speak with trump during the riot, Meadows told him that they didn't want an intervention because they wanted to maintain the narrative that trump was in control.

But that's not about your fraud claim.

Anthony60 said:
“The fact that President Trump authorized security for the Capitol and he ordered the transition of government—he could legally and factually not have been orchestrating a coup to conduct an insurrection,” says Kash Patel.
Click to expand...

That is not "legally" and it's definitely not "factually". Can you tell the difference? He stated that as if it was evidence, but that's an opinionated assumption. Even if he authorized that, he refused to act on J6 and that's Patel deceptively jumping to conclusions and intentionally confusing cause and effect. Just because trump authorized it before the event started does not lead to the conclusion that he did "not orchestrate a riot" .

What did he mean by "and ordered the transition of government" ???
Oh yeah , he surrendered to the constitution and the rule of law only afterthe riot failed!!! What a total lie!

This doesn't have anything to do with the fraud you claimed.

Anthony60 said:
Why hasn’t the FBI turned over all documentation related to January 6? Were there undercover government agents in the crowd that day? And why was Trump supporter Rosanne Boyland, who died that day, repeatedly beaten by a Capitol Police officer even while she was unconscious?
Click to expand...

With an investigation underway, they are not obligated to turn over anything at this time. Releasing information would contaminate the testimony of others.

Are the questions they've written proof or evidence of anything? What point are you making from the article? Those questions are a deflection from the constitutional issues of J6.

Anthony60 said:
Wow!
Click to expand...

I noticed you didn't specify a suspect or a crime of fraud in the 2020 election.
 
poweRob said:
There simply must be an insane amount of dark money being thrown around buying up officials' assistance and compliance this year.

​
The Department of Homeland Security’s chief watchdog scrapped its investigative team’s effort to collect agency phones to try to recover deleted Secret Service texts this year, according to four people with knowledge of the decision and internal records reviewed by The Washington Post.​
​
In early February, after learning that the Secret Service’s text messages had been erased as part of a migration to new devices, staff at Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari’s office planned to contact all DHS agencies offering to have data specialists help retrieve messages from their phones, according to two government whistleblowers who provided reports to Congress.​
Click to expand...
This part of the story gets more incredible every day.
 
Galactic Spin said:
That's right. They are already backed into that corner.

But in what universe is it any defense that he knowingly did something illegal on bad advice? He can't use his excuse of believing to the election was stolen to justify trying to steal it himself.
Click to expand...
Except that the former guy and his allies admitted his plan to stay in power. A complete admission of guilt .
 
Anthony60 said:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/kash-...national-guard-days-before-jan-6_4615875.html

In the days leading up to Jan. 6, 2021, President Donald Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guard, but official government documents show Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Washington mayor Muriel Bowser, and the D.C. Capitol Police each declined the offer.


“The fact that President Trump authorized security for the Capitol and he ordered the transition of government—he could legally and factually not have been orchestrating a coup to conduct an insurrection,” says Kash Patel.


Why hasn’t the FBI turned over all documentation related to January 6? Were there undercover government agents in the crowd that day? And why was Trump supporter Rosanne Boyland, who died that day, repeatedly beaten by a Capitol Police officer even while she was unconscious?

Wow!
Click to expand...
the above has been debunked numerous times on these boards

as to the originator of your "cite":
... The Epoch Media Group's news sites and YouTube channels have spread conspiracy theories ... and false claims of fraud in the 2020 United States presidential election ...
Click to expand...
a trash disseminator dedicated to conspiracy theory and the falun gong
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom