- Joined
- Jan 16, 2019
- Messages
- 23,702
- Reaction score
- 30,461
- Location
- Near Boise, ID
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
You totally failed to notice I never once mentioned Conservatism and or Conservatives.That is your willful ignorance of what conservativism is about, who we on the right are and what we support.
Oh my, where do I even begin with your "none sense"?YOU WANT that to be true, so any has been washed up nutcase who spews none sense you use to reinforce your own, intentionally wrong view of the right.
Why would you feel they were such awful comments if they were, as you have tried to claim, coming as blanket hateful comments from some willfully ignorant person in a snarky way?Because actually understanding someone that disagrees with you is hard work, not nearly as fun as making blanket and hateful comments in the most snarky way.
You totally failed to notice I never once mentioned Conservatism and or Conservatives.
Talk about a case of "willful ignorance" there, Renae!
Oh my, where do I even begin with your "none sense"?
You really have no clue who I am, ideologically speaking and you are really way off base regarding my legitimate view of many Republicans.
Why would you feel they were such awful comments if they were, as you have tried to claim, coming as blanket hateful comments from some willfully ignorant person in a snarky way?
What say you Renae?
Seeing as the vast majority of GOP voters are conservatives, your attempt to peddle out of your own mess is duly noted as failing, and yes I did have a typo in there and your harping on it shows your desperation in attempting to deflect and dance away from the mess you made.I think folks like Robert Foster should be totally embraced by the Republican Party after all it is Republicanism that is birthing and grooming these folks.
They should be inviting them to rallies and having them on Fox News and letting them speak at nominating conventions.
Lord knows Foster et al are just saying out loud what so many other Republicans are no doubt thinking to themselves.
Absolutely.Maxine-the moron-Waters could fill a phone book sized ledger with idiotic statements.
Didn’t happen.Such as claiming the almost near fatal beating of white truck driver Reginald Denny was justified
Even so, I doubt you can find Dem calling openly for people to be sent to firing squads.
Oh stop already. I'm so sick of the hypocritical sanctimony of some here on the left I want to literally puke.
Y'all get triggered so fast by even the barest hint of something to attack - reminds me of a pack of ravenous wolves - you don't even stop to question the validity of your faux rage.
Good grief.
Really? This is like, the most extreme stuff I could find a Democratic politician saying.And that's where you're mistaken.
Really? This is like, the most extreme stuff I could find a Democratic politician saying.
Here are six videos of Democrats calling for violence or physical confrontations that are still active on Twitter - Washington Examiner
Videos of Democrats during the Trump administration calling for their supporters to confront Republicans physically or warning of “civil unrest” on the streets are still active on Twitter. Rep. Maxine Waters, Rep. Ted Lieu, Sen. Cory Booker, Rep. Joaquin Castro, Sen. Jon Tester, and House...www.washingtonexaminer.com
LOLIf you want to say something stupid, agree with Logician man and you will succeed every time
Holy cow dude, way to necro a comment made several hundred posts ago.A strong opinion is “chocolate ice cream is absolutely the best flavor of all ice cream flavors”.
This;
View attachment 67391902
is a call to violence by a sick minded right wing nut job.
Well, to be fair - you haven't the remotest clue what you're talking about either so... there's that.Well, to be fair, it was a stupid pathetic ****ing comment.
So?
But who knows, perhaps you have a similar opinion about the above?I am all in favor of the firing squad for the 1/6 insurgents.
But as I am a compassionate man, I believe they should be stood against a sunny spot on the wall.
Nope. If anyone tries to overthrow the republic, I'm good with the firing squad.But who knows, perhaps you have a similar opinion about the above?
My guess is such judgmentalism only extends one direction, no?
If you don’t want anyone to respond to your idiotic, apologist response to a reprehensible comment, don’t post idiotic, apologist comments.Holy cow dude, way to necro a comment made several hundred posts ago.
And no, that isn't chocolate ice cream.
I bet you're the life of the party on the petty psychobabble circuit, huh?You don't have to be concerned about who understands what you write when you write clearly. And yes, if you choose to share your thoughts, you alone bear responsibility for them. Who else should bear responsibility for your expressed thoughts if not you?
Who's whining? There's more of that misinterpretation again - and again, not my fault.Then don't whine when you're misinterpreted. It's that simple.
Post #203 (yours) - Post #2 (mine)Also, look up the definition of “several”. You clearly don’t know.
Wow!I bet you're the life of the party on the petty psychobabble circuit, huh?
I also bet your teachers just loved it when you complained to them about your failing grades, claiming that if they'd only taught you more clearly you wouldn't have deserved that "F" you received.
Of course I / we bear responsibility for the things we say. No one is suggesting otherwise.
THAT said, how others interpret what we say (which, btw, is what we're talking about here) is most definitely NOT our responsibility, but that of the listener or reader.
Just because I say something you don't understand or interpret incorrectly is not my fault - nor is it carte blanche permission to pass hasty judgment on what I said.
Who's whining? There's more of that misinterpretation again - and again, not my fault.
But if it's "simple" you're after - here it is: ask for clarification next time.
Well then how about Democrats actually DOING extreme crap?Really? This is like, the most extreme stuff I could find a Democratic politician saying.
Here are six videos of Democrats calling for violence or physical confrontations that are still active on Twitter - Washington Examiner
Videos of Democrats during the Trump administration calling for their supporters to confront Republicans physically or warning of “civil unrest” on the streets are still active on Twitter. Rep. Maxine Waters, Rep. Ted Lieu, Sen. Cory Booker, Rep. Joaquin Castro, Sen. Jon Tester, and House...www.washingtonexaminer.com
So, act unruly, maybe burn down some buildings because you think kyle is a murderer, or punch trump because you think he's garbage is the same thing as "I want people to face firing squads for expressing their first amendment rights"? At least the "act unruly" bit could have some plausible deniability to backtrack to "protest" which is another 1st amendment right. At least the BLM riots were actions taken by the black community(and some white people joined in too) to perceived injustices they face at the hands of law enforcement and the prison system. None of this compares to "kill 'em because they exist and are expressing their rights".Well then how about Democrats actually DOING extreme crap?
After-Action Reports on the Riots of 2020
The unrest after the death of George Floyd overwhelmed many agencies and resulted in injuries to thousands of officers. What needs to be done before the next incident ignites protests and riots?www.policemag.com
Ad hominem attack is cowardly.I bet you're the life of the party on the petty psychobabble circuit, huh?
I also bet your teachers just loved it when you complained to them about your failing grades, claiming that if they'd only taught you more clearly you wouldn't have deserved that "F" you received.
Oh they may claim to be such, but I know better.Seeing as the vast majority of GOP voters are conservatives, your attempt to peddle out of your own mess is duly noted as failing, and yes I did have a typo in there and your harping on it shows your desperation in attempting to deflect and dance away from the mess you made.
Oh my, I'm so ashamed. (@Argent will explain to you what I mean)English is where you failed.
“Several hundred” indicates more than two hundreds (ex; 300, 400, etc.).
You’re welcome.
And an appeal to authority comeback - especially when it's your own - is boorish and conceited.Ad hominem attack is cowardly.
I graduated summa cum laude.
I've won awards for short stories I've written.
I'm imperfect and own my mistakes. You should own yours.
Don’t feel so bad. You’ve posted far stupider shit.Oh my, I'm so ashamed.
Well, no, (1) I didn't claim to be an expert in any area; and, (2) I made no statement about my area of mastery; and (3) since there is no area of mastery stated, there can be no agreement among experts in the area of knowledge under consideration. Nothing I said meets the standards required for appeal to authority.And an appeal to authority comeback - especially when it's your own - is boorish and conceited.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?