• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:148] Affirmative Action promotes systemic racial discrimination.

I have asked you at least a dozen times-if affirmative action programs allow blacks with lower test scores to gain admissions ahead of some whites and Asians with better scores. You have refused to answer that easy question so far.

why?
LMAO
I have asked at least 50 times for anybody to prove the op thread title and the 5 claims in question to be statements of facts nobody has dont this easy request so far?

why?
 
LMAO
I have asked at least 50 times for anybody to prove the op thread title and the 5 claims in question to be statements of facts nobody has dont this easy request so far?

why?
Why are you afraid to answer this basic question/ I think we both know the answer. You know damn well that affirmative action programs are based on the premise that blacks with lower objective qualifications are given admissions to selective universities ahead of whites and Asians with better qualifications. If you admit that, your entire tsunami level of denials and screaming "meltdown and 'triggered" will look even more stupid because that concession will establish most of what the OP has asserted.

so you run from that question and refuse to answer it and continue to pretend that the obvious does not exist.
 
LMAO
I have asked at least 50 times for anybody to prove the op thread title and the 5 claims in question to be statements of facts nobody has dont this easy request so far?

why?
From post# 1627---- "You know damn well........." <----When OP and the 5 claims in question can not be proven to be factual statements, the bullet train to losing that argument is trying, and failing, to attribute one's own words to another poster. Basically, the white towel of surrender has been waved.
 
Why are you afraid to answer this basic question/ I think we both know the answer. You know damn well that affirmative action programs are based on the premise that blacks with lower objective qualifications are given admissions to selective universities ahead of whites and Asians with better qualifications. If you admit that, your entire tsunami level of denials and screaming "meltdown and 'triggered" will look even more stupid because that concession will establish most of what the OP has asserted.

so you run from that question and refuse to answer it and continue to pretend that the obvious does not exist.
aaaaaand another triggered meltdown and failed deflection post full of lies that doesn't answer my simple question, thanks for proving us right yet again! This is awesome!
LMAO
 
aaaaaand another triggered meltdown and failed deflection post full of lies that doesn't answer my simple question, thanks for proving us right yet again! This is awesome!
LMAO
your evasions are well document and calling my easy questions to be "triggered meltdowns" prove you are aware of the fragility of your bogus position. I get the fact that recipients of affirmative action are loathe to admit what the program does
 
aaaaaand another triggered meltdown and failed deflection post full of lies that doesn't answer my simple question, thanks for proving us right yet again! This is awesome!
LMAO
From post# 1630 -----"prove that you are aware" <-----Yet another failed argument as failed mind reading is also a bullet train to losing the debate.
 
From post# 1830 -----"prove that you are aware" <-----Yet another failed argument as failed mind reading is also a bullet train to losing the debate.
there isn't a post 1830.
 
your evasions are well document and calling my easy questions to be "triggered meltdowns" prove you are aware of the fragility of your bogus position. I get the fact that recipients of affirmative action are loathe to admit what the program does
the evasions of my questions of my general questions in this thread are well documented and me pointing out the reality that they are not statements of facts triggered posted meltdown throughout this thread
proving the fragility of the bogus thread title and 5 claims in question in the OP.
I get the fact that reality is hard sometimes but the reality remains there's nothing that makes them statements of fact. Thanks for proving me right again, let us know when these facts change, thanks!
 
From post# 1630 -----"prove that you are aware" <-----Yet another failed argument as failed mind reading is also a bullet train to losing the debate.
The op has been destroyed countless times by multiple posters.
if those things could be proven to be statements of fact it would just be done instead of all the dodges deflections and failed starwmen lol
 
The op has been destroyed countless times by multiple posters.
if those things could be proven to be statements of fact it would just be done instead of all the dodges deflections and failed starwmen lol
No one has destroyed the OP . Recipients and fans of affirmative action have run away from the many citations that we have provided PROVING that blacks with lower scores have been granted admissions ahead of more qualified whites and Asians. That fact establishes the rest of the assertions in the OP
 
No one has destroyed the OP .
Thread history and facts prove otherwise. Op has been destroyed over and over for 1600+ post and 40+ days. Its an all-time epic failure.
Denying it doesn't change facts, hence way nobody can show the total 6 claims in question to be statements of facts.
 
Thread history and facts prove otherwise. Op has been destroyed over and over for 1600+ post and 40+ days. Its an all-time epic failure.
Denying it doesn't change facts, hence way nobody can show the total 6 claims in question to be statements of facts.
several people denying the obvious hardly destroys anything. Can you cite to me ONE fact that you have posted that rebuts the undeniable fact that affirmative action has resulted in blacks with much lower test scores getting into selective schools ahead of whites and Asians with higher scores? Have you ever tried to counter the fact that when California removed race as a factor in admissions, black admissions went WAY down? Have you ever tried to belie the claim that numerous scholarly articles made that if race was erased as a consideration at the top 15 law schools, black acceptances would drop NINETY Percent?

No, you never countered those. You cannot. Rather than accepting the obvious as true and then trying to argue why society is better off by allowing a bunch of under qualified black applicants to gain admissions ahead of much higher scoring applicants, you scream "triggered" and "Meltdown" and run away from those uncomfortable facts.
 
several people denying the obvious hardly destroys anything. Can you cite to me ONE fact that you have posted that rebuts the undeniable fact that affirmative action has resulted in blacks with much lower test scores getting into selective schools ahead of whites and Asians with higher scores? Have you ever tried to counter the fact that when California removed race as a factor in admissions, black admissions went WAY down? Have you ever tried to belie the claim that numerous scholarly articles made that if race was erased as a consideration at the top 15 law schools, black acceptances would drop NINETY Percent?

No, you never countered those. You cannot. Rather than accepting the obvious as true and then trying to argue why society is better off by allowing a bunch of under qualified black applicants to gain admissions ahead of much higher scoring applicants, you scream "triggered" and "Meltdown" and run away from those uncomfortable facts.
Thanks for posting your meaningless feelings but facts don't care LMAO 🤷‍♂️
 
Thanks for posting your meaningless feelings but facts don't care LMAO 🤷‍♂️
why do you constantly talk about facts, when you have yet to either post a single fact on this thread, nor rebut any of the myriad facts those of us who detest affirmative racial discrimination have supplied? Can your inability to actually argue effectively be blamed on affirmative action?
 
why do you constantly talk about facts, when you have yet to either post a single fact on this thread
post this lie 500 times it will never work only be pointed out as the lie it is
nor rebut any of the myriad facts those of us who detest affirmative racial discrimination have supplied? Can your inability to actually argue effectively be blamed on affirmative action?
your feelings don't need rebutting, they don't matter to the fact that nothing has been provided to make the 6 things in question statement of facts. let us know when that changes thanks.
 
post this lie 500 times it will never work only be pointed out as the lie it is

your feelings don't need rebutting, they don't matter to the fact that nothing has been provided to make the 6 things in question statement of facts. let us know when that changes thanks.
Still haven't posted any factual rebuttal
 
Still has been any postings that prove the 6 thinss in questions statements of facts 🍿
if you were to admit the obvious, then you would concede most of them are true. We have already proven that affirmative action flies in the face of meritocracy. We have proven that discrimination based on race runs counter to the intent of anti discrimination laws
 
if you were to admit the obvious, then you would concede most of them are true. We have already proven that affirmative action flies in the face of meritocracy. We have proven that discrimination based on race runs counter to the intent of anti discrimination laws
More feelings, no facts changing anything, keep those failed posts coming! :)
 
More feelings, no facts changing anything, keep those failed posts coming! :)
This is coming from the source of the most intellectually bankrupt posts on the thread. How about citing something that actually supports your claim that affirmative action DOES NOT result in lesser qualified individuals gaining admissions ahead of much better applications?
 
This is coming from the source of the most intellectually bankrupt posts on the thread. How about citing something that actually supports your claim that affirmative action DOES NOT result in lesser qualified individuals gaining admissions ahead of much better applications?
LMAO another post, more lies and zero facts that change the reality of the 6 claims not being statements of facts, keep trying!
 
LMAO another post, more lies and zero facts that change the reality of the 6 claims not being statements of facts, keep trying!
zero facts-your posts.
 
zero facts-your posts.
except for this one . . .the ONLY one that matters and destroys the op each and every time 😁

FACT:
this hasn't been anything posted the makes the 6 claims in question statements of fact


ANYBODY that disagrees please prove otherwise, thanks!
 
except for this one . . .the ONLY one that matters and destroys the op each and every time 😁

FACT:
this hasn't been anything posted the makes the 6 claims in question statements of fact


ANYBODY that disagrees please prove otherwise, thanks!
so you are denying that merit based selections are corrupted when those with inferior credentials are selected ahead of those with superior credentials.

I understand why you are afraid to answer easy questions-
 
so you are denying that merit based selections are corrupted when those with inferior credentials are selected ahead of those with superior credentials.

I understand why you are afraid to answer easy questions-
Translation: it cant be done, thanks we already knew that fact 😁 🍿
 
Back
Top Bottom