• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

US Police arrest Florida pastor


You support censoring Terry Jones, so what are you mad about?
 
I think most Muslims would likely ignore this idiot Terry Jones.

I also think that people would be ticked off if he was going to burn 3,000 Bibles or Torahs.

Only the idiots would want his rights violated for burning Biles and Torahs.

I love how the folks that support birning Old Glory as a sacred right are the same people that want to throw this dude in jail for burning books. Political correctness sucks!
 


I think you have a problem if you think I support flag burning..
 

Obviously a lot of people are frightened to death of the savages and would rather give up their rights. It's really quite pathetic. :roll:
 

Good morning, apdst. :2wave:

:agree: Ironic, isn't it, that there always seem to be different rules and standards for some people? I can't think of any country on this planet that approves burning their own flag! :thumbdown:
 
Obviously a lot of people are frightened to death of the savages and would rather give up their rights. It's really quite pathetic. :roll:

In Afghanistan?

Terry Jones didn't plan to burn the Korans in Egypt or Libya.
 
In Afghanistan?

Terry Jones didn't plan to burn the Korans in Egypt or Libya.

WTH does that have to do with my post? I'm talking about people here in the USA who are willing to give up certain freedoms to appease terrorists, which is exactly what you see being demonstrated here in this thread.

Give me one good reason otherwise why this man should not burn a Koran. You will say because it's insensitive or offensive, and that is completely irrelevant and is no reason to limit any freedoms.
 

What freedom are we giving up... The freedom to start a fire in a public park?
 
What freedom are we giving up... The freedom to start a fire in a public park?

Freedom of expression, freedom of dissent. Do I have to refer you to Ben Franklin's famous quote? Do you really want to live in a country where you can't do things for the fear of offending someone? That is retarded.
 

No, they burned books they saw as "un-German". They were books from Jewish German writers, communist writers, books from Jung were among the books that were burned.

The Germans had a theory of "entartete kunst" which stands for degenerated art. All kinds of books, paintings, etc. were under that heading. Book burning was just part of the attempt of the Nazi's to also put all of society in a stranglehold by banning/burning books of people who had different views from them, books they saw as too modern and degenerate who would corrupt the German people with their weird, foreign, degenerate views and imagery.

The burning of books was the first step in the process of mind control the Nazi's instigated.
 
Freedom of expression, freedom of dissent. Do I have to refer you to Ben Franklin's famous quote? Do you really want to live in a country where you can't do things for the fear of offending someone? That is retarded.

I think a municipality has the right to ban certain behaviors.
 
Freedom of expression, freedom of dissent. Do I have to refer you to Ben Franklin's famous quote? Do you really want to live in a country where you can't do things for the fear of offending someone? That is retarded.

So why isn't it legal for gays to marry in all states?
 

A significant percentage of the Arab world is profoundly ignorant and married to their close family members, too.


and you want us to emulate them......:doh
 

Holy ****, did I say that was all they burned? Moot compared wanted to speak in a religious context, so I did.

Is that really what you're bringing to this conversation? More perpetuation of moot's idiotic nazi comparison?

Let me know when you're ready to address the topic.
 
More perpetuation of moot's idiotic nazi comparison?

.

It is a comparison made even more ironic by the fact she supports the Islamist position when it comes to her hatred of the liberal notion of free speech. Yes, by all means, let's all support heavy handed totalitarianism to show how much we are against it.
 
The burning of books was the first step in the process of mind control the Nazi's instigated.

As is the prevention of any criticism of Islam by the Islamists you support.

Take away people's ability to protest an anti-humanist ideology and you serve the ends of such an ideology.
 

And what point is that, all I did was correct/expand the book burning comment, nothing more and nothing less.
 
As is the prevention of any criticism of Islam by the Islamists you support.

Take away people's ability to protest an anti-humanist ideology and you serve the ends of such an ideology.

I don't support any religion. I am an atheist.
 
And what point is that, all I did was correct/expand the book burning comment, nothing more and nothing less.

You expanded something for no reason, as that detail had absolutely no relevance to any point whatsoever. I'm here to debate the topic not argue about irrelevant BS.


Well, since I've known her she's been a very passionate anti-freedom advocate. I'd say this is pretty much par for her. Let's all appease the muslims.
 
I don't support any religion. I am an atheist.

You are supporting the Islamist objective. Your own religion has nothing to do with it.

The actual Nazis used their state power to burn books in order to eliminate free expression. You want the state to use it's power to prevent certain thoughts from being expressed. Have you considered how you are much more like them in this regard than unlike?
 
I think a municipality has the right to ban certain behaviors.

To ban the burning of a particular book, as it is being done as a sign of symbolism because of the burner's intent to show dissent for the particular ideology, is an infringement on our rights.
 
Let's all appease the muslims.

and the most fundamentalist of Muslims,too. It would be like outlawing homosexuality because of Westboro Baptist.

By supporting the agenda of violent Islamist fundies as these people wish to do, all they accomplish is to make life more difficult for those Muslims who AREN'T Islamists. Joining the Jihad as willing participants as these people are doing sure won't make the problem of Islamism go away. Far from it. It will only help tip the balance towards the Islamists in their fight fight against more moderate Muslims.

The moderate Muslims aren't going to riot when some idiot burns books in Florida. They are the ones being undermined by the useful idiocy inherent in siding with the Islamists.
 
So why isn't it legal for gays to marry in all states?

Because the states are involved. Don't you see yet why governmental control over rights is a BAD thing overall for everyone? I know others will say marriage isn't a right, but I would argue that two people wanting to marry as being covered under the "pursuit of happiness."
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…