joG
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2013
- Messages
- 43,839
- Reaction score
- 9,656
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: UK EU referendum [W:40]
I have pointed out that I dislike corresponding with rude ideologues, when they bring nothing but opinion and old hat to the table, while negating the obvious.
Could have fooled me!
So you spent lots of time and effort to come up with this?
Okay lets get some thing straight here.. and you should know this according to yourself.
The EU/EEC has evolved since it got started in 1957, where the original treaty was called The Treaty of Rome. Now what most people seem to not understand, is that this Treaty is still valid. Since then there has been add-on treaties to factor in more members and the implementation of factors of the Treaty of Rome.
Now the EU constitution would have replaced it all, with the SAME content plus the Treaty of Lisbon. Now the problem in doing this, is that would require referendums in many countries. The problem with referendums on stuff like this, is that it becomes more about national politics and not so much about the actual issue. It happened in Ireland and in France. Dont even try to deny that.
So yes, the EU members had to do another amending treaty instead of replacing the whole thing with a Constitution. And of course the Lisbon Treaty would be very similar to the Constitution because most of the changes were needed because of changes in number of members and so on.
There is no conspiracy here.. the process was very open and clear what they did. A new constitution would require referendums because.. it is new.. where as an amendment treaty in most cases does not because it is not.. new. Not hard to understand.
I have pointed out that I dislike corresponding with rude ideologues, when they bring nothing but opinion and old hat to the table, while negating the obvious.