• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.K. Supreme Court Rules Trans Women Can’t Be Defined as Women

That is the legal ruling. The definition of a woman. They are not saying you legally have to use it, except with regards to laws, you do.

Sounds pretty defined... just like an unborn human minutes before birth is not a Person.
.

That's where I messed up. I didn't read all four pages, and I see you had already pretty much written the same thing I did just now.

BUT, I think that kid is a kid those minutes before first peeking out into a new environment. "New" to her/him. Just wanted to disagree with you there and then hope I don't get Mod Axed for going off-topic.
 
Well they never frame it that way they call it gender-affirming care but it's not. If you stop the puberty of a boy they don't turn into a girl they just never mature. So they'll be at 28-year-old pre pubescent boy.

And the idea that has been admitted to is to get them into this as quickly as possible before they can change their mind.

If there's people that grow up and say "yeah when I was about 12 or 13 years old I felt like I would have been better off being the opposite sex but then through growing up and learning how to accept myself I learned that it was probably best just to let things happen the way they naturally do." It will undermine the idea that you're born this way and you can't change it. I don't think it necessarily will because they're always have been people that no matter what they did it was never going to click with them and they have wound up being transsexuals. But they had the time to deal with it and grow up and understand that this is the best for them. I bet if we take that approach there would be a lot less opposition to it.
 

I think it is a kid, child and baby before it is born, just not a person.


.,
 
I am not reduced to insults. I have great and fantastic insults. People say, "Helix, your insults are the best insults. You should do that for a living." Maybe I will.

Funny about this one, as I figured out some years ago that some of the finest insults are the ones you typed or spoke and you didn't/don't know was/is an insult until hours, days, months, even years later.

And sorry I can't get that grammar correct up there. Better set aside the green tea and work on some breakfast.
 
This is common sense. Hopefully we catch up to them.
 
I think it is a kid, child and baby before it is born, just not a person.
.,

Uh oh! You got me on this. I really do need my breakfast. That one will take me all day to figure out.
 
Uh oh! You got me on this. I really do need my breakfast. That one will take me all day to figure out.

Are you in Asia, or something? Perth?
 
I do try to stay on top of my insults.
 
Are you in Asia, or something? Perth?
Kanto area, which is what is called Tokyo-to, not inside the city of Tokyo itself. Live way out west in and near the mountains. Kind of sad, though, I am no longer medically able to go about higher than 500 above sea level, so most mountains are now off-limits. It is called dislocation of the chain in my right ear and in the flight physical some years ago when they spotted that trouble I also got grounded and all license authorizations by FAA and a few other agencies revoked. But it is still okay for me to go up to the top of Takao-san [mountain] and that one isn't too far from this residence.

Long answer to why my breakfast time is now, yep? Have to keep up that old-fart yak-yak-yak --- long posts style. Drives the folks that use them Star Trek phones crazy when I do loooooong posts.
 

Since most of the board is in the USA or Europe, I am generally the earliest one up, in New Zealand. There are a couple of Aussies and a guy from Singapore... but not many past me. LOL.

Were you military?
 
Since most of the board is in the USA or Europe, I am generally the earliest one up, in New Zealand. There are a couple of Aussies and a guy from Singapore... but not many past me. LOL.

Were you military?

Yes, military, Government Schedules, and allowed to work for two other governments; well one other until that general fella pulled off that coup and got really pissed off at me and forced me over to Japan. Now I am glad he did, because I learned a second racism lesson by what he did to me and the U.S. government. Kind of have to thank President Carter too for something he did to set it all up. A rather long story that few know.

And then working in Kasumigaseki for the Japanese government was some serious education.

By the way, back in the early 80s I spent some quality time in both the ROK and Japan with a fella from your country. He is the one that taught me not to pronounce it New Z'ee'land. Corresponded with his mom a few times, too. Seemed like a good family. Got him some employment in the ROK to help him with his funds for more traveling.
 
Can't read the article as the publication requires a membership. I am interested in it if you have another article talking about the subject.
I was able to access using the "Thru Your Institution" link and it is a 13-minute read. But I'm not sure what I am authorized to do here? I mean, maybe just copy a paragraph or two of the most substantive parts?

You got ten plus more years of membership here, CLAX1911, --- ten plus more years than I; any advice? I don't mind copying the whole article here, if it is legal.

BUT, this is super interesting and I obviously knew nothing about this and so I am going to stick my neck out and post a copy of just this bit:

 
Thank you.
 
I actually thought of the UK as being worse than America in this regard because America sort of takes the whole women’s bathroom as something thats just always been the case instead of a women’s sex based right.

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here. Could you rewrite this please?

Secondly the reason trans women prisoners were moved to women’s prisons was because of prison rape culture and v-coding where trans women would be fed to the most violent prisoners in men’s prisons to satiate them, aka rape.

This quite possibly happened in the past here in the UK but going the other way and putting someone into a women's prison while they still have male genitalia is just as bad.

And I work with pro LGBT people on Mars.

Sarcasm isn't your strong point.

Stop lying about openly LGBT people in Muslim countries.

This may be the world you want to exist but it's not the one that does.

You've probably never even lived outside the USA.
 
A gay man is a male who is attracted to other males. What is your definition of a homosexual man?

Can a female who is attracted to males be a gay man? I'm referring to a transman.
 
Can a female who is attracted to males be a gay man? I'm referring to a transman.



Good question. The answer will have to be "yes". Anything else will mean a transman different from a man.
 
Nobody is surprised by this ruling from TERF island.

BTW, biological sex isn't binary.

Biological sex is binary, unless you can name me a third gamete.
 
For what it's worth (and getting back to the thread topic), I disagree with the court's ruling.

The court was deciding whether the reference to women in the Equalities Act includes transwoman who have a Gender Recognition Certificate (which allows you to change your gender on official documents).
I think if you have changed your gender on legal documents, then you should be regarded as a woman for legal purposes.

Obviously it's important that males can't just self-identity as women and make themselves eligible, for example, to public positions that are designed to increase female representation in the respective area.
 
Biological sex is binary, unless you can name me a third gamete.

I think there may just be some third thingy involved, BUT --- and that is a BIG BUT --- I am only referring to that article that bomberfox posted the link for and . . . well, I know zip-zero-nothing about all this medical stuff and I'm not even sure I care. But it seems proper to offer up the writings from some folks that seem to know this stuff and also seem to care.

And it might be okay to copy parts of that article as warranted to aid the discussion, so this is a section that is just before sections titled "Cellular sex" and "Beyond the binary" and here goes:


Please remember, all, I am just trying to help and have no sides in any pro-con type argument any of y'all may be into. Kind of like doing a duty here.
 
Okay, I erred on one point; the definition of "DSD" wasn't shown in either of the two posts where I copied some of that article, so here it is, from the article:

... known as intersex conditions, or differences or disorders of sex development (DSDs) ...
 
I love the unaware celebration of real political correctness from the Right.