• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Two law enforcement sources told CBS News that the suspect had a handgun, an AR-15 assault weapon and high capacity magazines.

This is your message to the families of dead children? Obviously your "this" is what ended their lives. To say "This is being safe" after 19 children were murdered with this type of weapon is profoundly ignorant, and it's not the first time for you.
lol.... It was the memes

 
Yep, America First… ranked in the world in school shootings.
And if proper safety protocol was in place shooter would not have found a back door unlocked like the other door he tried.
 
How many kids can a person kill very quickly with a 3D printer?
And why do you always make a series of totally ridiculous comments after every mass shooting?
Considering 3-D printers can make a working gun, I'd not throw stones about ridiculous postings.
 
'Not letting"? And I don't care about other countries. America first.
Banning tactical gear doesn't infringe...so...
 
And if proper safety protocol was in place shooter would not have found a back door unlocked like the other door he tried.

Indeed. The only reason why other countries don’t have school shootings like America does is because their schools are well defended fortresses full of armed guards.
 
Tell it to a couple of dozen of dead children.
And you probably think that was a witty comeback. (It wasn't).

Addressing an issue starts with honesty regarding what an issue is. A deeply disturbed person committed a horrific act.
 
How many kids can a person kill very quickly with a 3D printer?

Dumb red herring.

How many kids can a person kill very quickly with an 11-round handgun magazine?

And why do you always make a series of totally ridiculous comments after every mass shooting?

I'm not making ridiculous comments, I'm responding to them.
 

An assault rifle and high capacity magazines. Weapon and ammo meant for one primary purpose—to kill lots of human beings in a very quick and efficient manner. Gee, where have we heard this story before.
Some kids were so unidentifiable that they had to ask parents for their DNA to identify them.

Happy 2nd amendment victory day!
 
Again, it's reality. You can throw around all the arguments from emotion that you want to. At the end of the day, you are restricted by the constitution from infringing on peoples rights. You will need to pass an amendment in order to do what you want. You have no chance of doing that though.

How long do you think most American's will continue to tolerate living like this?
 
And if proper safety protocol was in place shooter would not have found a back door unlocked like the other door he tried.

It's the schools fault!
 
And you probably think that was a witty comeback. (It wasn't).

Addressing an issue starts with honesty regarding what an issue is. A deeply disturbed person committed a horrific act.

More correctly, a deeply disturbed person was allowed to legally purchase two firearms and 375 rounds of ammo two weeks ago and use them to KILL 23 people...

 
Good argument for arming our LEO with armor piercing rounds.

Yes, great, arm police with ammo that can go through multiple walls and kill innocent people nearby.

What a fantastic idea. Hell, why not just have the police drive around in Abrahms tanks using uranium tipped shells as that's sure to really stop a bad guy.
 
How long do you think most American's will continue to tolerate living like this?
Living like what? These types of shootings are extremely rare. They account for less than 1% of homicides. They are horribly tragic when they do happen, but proposing "solutions" that have no chance of passing, being constitutional, or are in any way effective is just stupid.
 
Living like what? These types of shootings are extremely rare. They account for less than 1% of homicides. They are horribly tragic when they do happen, but proposing "solutions" that have no chance of passing, being constitutional, or are in any way effective is just stupid.

Is repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act unconstitutional?
 
Is repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act unconstitutional?
Why does it need repealed? We've established already that a manufacturer is in no way liable for the criminal misuse of their product. This applies to firearms, hammers, soft ball bats and every other product made.
 
Why does it need repealed? We've established already that a manufacturer is in no way liable for the criminal misuse of their product. This applies to firearms, hammers, soft ball bats and every other product made.


Let a jury decide just like the tobacco industry faced... You seem awfully afraid to have these manufacturers face a jury... Afraid your "not liable" will not hold up?
 
Let a jury decide just like the tobacco industry faced...
There is objectively zero liability for the criminal misuse of a product. I understand that you have no actual valid argument, so you need to throw out red herrings and invalid comparisons, but it doesn't change the facts.
You seem awfully afraid to have these manufacturers face a jury...
You are projecting. They have zero liability. You are wanting nuisance lawsuits as a way to punish manufacturers. There have no liability.
Afraid your "not liable" will not hold up?
We know it won't hold up, objectively. There is no legal liability for the criminal misuse of a product. You can stomp your feet until you have blisters, but that won't change.
 
Living like what? These types of shootings are extremely rare. They account for less than 1% of homicides. They are horribly tragic when they do happen, but proposing "solutions" that have no chance of passing, being constitutional, or are in any way effective is just stupid.
Its worth the risk to drop the shooter before he mows down kids
 
Back
Top Bottom