Seriously? What the **** are you talking about? Trump is a criminal - a lifelong criminal - and the preponderance of people who identify as "on the right" absolutely fall over themselves to defend him.
This thread has nothing to do with that loser.
My comment directly addressed your post #201 about the left defending criminals.
Lawfare was not used against them.
The idea that "lawfare" was used against Trump is bullshit. Trump's racism, money laundering, tax cheating, sexual predation, and recidivist criminal FRAUD predate his forays into politics by many decades.
You should be asking a lifelong criminal that question. It doesn't apply to me. It applies to Trump.
You're wasting your time arguing what you already know is legally indefensible. Why do you persist?
You should stop expecting me to give a shit about lowlife thugs. Shit needs to be flushed. Not kept on the streets.
In the world of what is morally indefensible, shooting people soars to the top of the list.
Strange seeing you whine about someone calling people trash.
Guess it is only ok when you do it huh.
It’s funny how often you repeat that lie despite it being disproven over and over again.You're absolutely right. Getting rid of so many firearms on our streets and in public hands would help reduce crime too.
Fewer Guns Mean Fewer Gun Homicides
www.nber.org
So violent crime is falling and yet we keep adding more and more guns.
Violent Crime Is Falling Nationwide — Here’s How We Know
Preliminary FBI data, however imperfect, confirms a sharp downward trend in crime, undercutting attempts to blame criminal justice reform for pandemic-era spikes in violence.www.brennancenter.org
Clearly the 13 year olds thought it was.
It was a robbery per state law.
Where are you getting this? It must be a newer article I'm unaware of because the OP's article says:
Depends on the crime. Ever hear of the "fleeing felon" rule?
nypost.com
It's illegal unless your own life is threatened. Period.
Argue all you want. Argue with yourself. Even law enforcement are not allowed to shoot someone for committing a robbery, and you insist that you can.
Life is too short to bother with deliberately obtuse people.
I'll end this exchange now because it is obvious you don't have the intellectual honesty to answer a simple question - not even to yourself. Have fun shooting thieves.
I'd be interested to see the statistics of how often diapers and baby food are shoplifted.??WHA...?? You think shooting a car thief makes us safer?!? On what planet does that happen?
I guess there's no sense in asking you about whether or not the punishment should fit the crime. Too complicated a question for you. As Trump's biggest fanboy, I'm sure you were tickled to hear him say he'd have the National Guard shoot shoplifters. There's a country you'd delight in living in.
In Trumpistan, everyone found guilty of stealing diapers and baby food would be sentenced to death.
Thanks for that. Point taken. My remark was a glib reflexive riff on the post I responded to, and I should not have. As a rule, I never characterize human beings as trash. Although when I was an angry young man, I do recall tossing one particularly belligerent fellow into a 40yd construction dumpster. I seriously tore my right trapezius muscle getting him over the top, and an hour later had to climb in myself, wake him up and help him get out. It was winter, and I was afraid he might freeze to death. Lesson learned, I guess. I don’t go tossing people around anymore. No matter how bad they are, people are not trash - they are human beings.
?? Perhaps I feel the need to not get left behind in fascist Trumpistan ???
