Tucker knows "how brown people think" and he knows they will not agree with him. He knows that no amount of education or explanation or experience or even wisdom could possibly bring brown people over to his side. He claims nothing, absolutely nothing, could convince brown people to agree with him.
In my recent posts I have touched on the topic of 'critical race theory' 'critical theory generally' 'oppression studies' 'intersectionality' 'gender oppression' and the whole range of postmodern critical theory spin-offs.
I think I can demonstrate, and anyone could themselves demonstrate, that these are nefarious, dangerous and anti-liberal idea-movements. Though I have read some of the original postmdernists and, like the philosophers of the Frankfurt School, some have at the very least interesting ideas and some have valuable ideas (read for example Foucault's '
Parrhesia' which I thought was very intelligent), in our present these ideas have been reduced and concentrated in such a way that they are 'the fool's gold' that Calamity refers to: a dangerous, but addictive, pseudo-philosophical position that leads to bona fide misperception and destructive activism.
I will make the following sugestion: that if anyone were presented with the 'real facts' about these postmodern distortions, and if they could be throught-through, they would unquestionably be rejected.
Who is behind these critical theories? Who gets behind them? Who got behind them first? Not 'people of color' by-and-large but white academics. True indeed that in their modified, transmogrified form they have been taken up by Black activists and other activists who work in the 'race category', but I am pretty sure that most rational people, of any particular color or culture-background, would reject Critical Theory if they could be shown how destructive it is.
To say "Tucker knows how brown people think and he knows they will not agree with him" is actually grotesque as an assertion and substantially false. It is
calumny in a way. He does not deal and never has with 'how POC think'. It is not a term that he has ever used nor would use. He is actually attempting in his discourse to avoid racial categories altogether.
But note this: It is those of the Critical Theory Activist Camp who assert that he traffics in race and is a racist. They
must make him one or their entire project . . . falls on its face!
Opposition to the projects of critical race theorists will earn you deadly attacks on your character and intentions. Do so and you are relegated
to the outer darkness of deplorable morality!
So again, these people have to find problems and aggravate them. They have to seek a tension or a conflict and then go to work on it insidiously to turn it into a crisis. But they cannot and they never do admit to this underhanded and devious tactic.
They can't. If they did they would undermine their own project. They'd have to begin to work constructively, not like burrowing rodents. (Sorry, that was rhetorical flourish!)
He knows that no amount of education or explanation or experience or even wisdom could possibly bring brown people over to his side. He claims nothing, absolutely nothing, could convince brown people to agree with him.
You have invented this! This is a total invention on your part!
And this shows how insidious what you
do is. You must be stopped (through recognizing what you do and calling you out on it).
The doctor is
in!
