- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 8,713
- Reaction score
- 1,907
- Location
- The Derby City
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
No, and a four year old probably wouldn't react at all if the parent didn't overreact. And let's not forget, you can use the scanner.
This parent will overreact. There are a lot of things a child may not overreact to that are straight out inappropriate.No, and a four year old probably wouldn't react at all if the parent didn't overreact. And let's not forget, you can use the scanner.
This parent will overreact. There are a lot of things a child may not overreact to that are straight out inappropriate.
And I'll be God-damned if some snot-nosed high-school dropout loser rent-a-cop-wanna-be police-academy-washout TSA agent is going to get his jollies by looking at my naked four-year-old daughter.
This parent will overreact. There are a lot of things a child may not overreact to that are straight out inappropriate.
And I'll be God-damned if some snot-nosed high-school dropout loser rent-a-cop-wanna-be police-academy-washout TSA agent is going to get his jollies by looking at my naked four-year-old daughter.
Please explain to me exactly how a person travels across the Pacific in a timely manner without being forced to "freakin' fly". Thanks in advance.Then don't freakin' fly with her. It's really not that hard, Coronado.
Your characterization of TSO's is totally and completely inappropriate. They're doing their job as it's been given to them. They aren't high school dropouts and they aren't losers. And they aren't getting their jollies looking at your naked 4-year-old daughter. They're just like you and me -- tryin' to earn a living. Don't like what they do? That's one thing. But maligning 50,000 people is just juvenile.
Really? How did the parents react ??
Calmly, honestly, and not make it something it isn't. No one is fondled.
Calmly, honestly, and not make it something it isn't. No one is fondled.
I think it is fine. I have no problem with either the scanner or being searched.
No one is fondled. Seriously, that's hyperbole on your part.
I am not flying to the US with my family anytime soon with these regulations in place. If we have to visit family in NH, we will fly into Montreal rather than Boston to avoid this crap. And vacations??? Not to the us, we will stay in East Asia where we can avoid this idiocy...
They are already doing it...
TSA pats down a screaming toddler
I haven't heard anyone object to being searched. It's the groping of genitals and virtually naked pictures plastered everywhere that has everyone up in arms.
No one is feeling anyone up.
"You touch my junk and I'm going to have you arrested."
TSA. Testicle Seekers Association.
His blog:<Insert title here>: TSA encounter at SAN
.
Please explain to me exactly how a person travels across the Pacific in a timely manner without being forced to "freakin' fly". Thanks in advance.
So I either let some TSA flunky grope my preschooler or let one ogle her naked, or just simply deny her the opportunity to see half of her family until the good folks in D.C. pull their heads out of their asses?Don't fly across the Pacific. That's your choice....either fly...and accept what is with some modicum of grace...or don't fly at all.
Don't fly across the Pacific. That's your choice....either fly...and accept what is with some modicum of grace...or don't fly at all.
That can't possibly be true. The good folks at TSA would never do such a thing! They're the salt of the Earth!One Hundred Naked Citizens: One Hundred Leaked Body Scans
ohmy, these type of incidents is gonna increase.
Don't fly across the Pacific. That's your choice....either fly...and accept what is with some modicum of grace...or don't fly at all.
That can't possibly be true. The good folks at TSA would never do such a thing! They're the salt of the Earth!
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It seems pretty clear to me. People cannot be searched unless there is a reason--supported by oath or affirmation--that they are breaking the law. What next? Random car searches at Target, to prevent terrorism? Random drug testing or house searches? Maybe you can house cops in your home. Maybe you can be considered guilty until proven innocent--for the sake of safety, of course. While we're at it, why not suspend the elections and let the supreme court decide who is our ruler?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?