Who cares?
It seems you are anti-knowledge. Let's just report the facts. A study consists of graphs, numbers, statistics, comparisons. Are you afraid of the truth?
Just because you don't believe in global warming, should that mean we shouldn't study climate?
A study itself is not political. How it is interpreted can be but I support putting it all out there. It sounds like you know any study will be bad showing guns need to be restricted more. Are you afraid of the truth?
It isn't our side that's anti-knowledge. The Democrats are insisting these "common sense" laws are necessary to reduce gun violence. None have been approved by CDC after a scientific study. They aren't waiting on studies. That's anti-knowledge.
Universal background checks, with no limit on cost to the citizen.
Reduce magazine capacity to 5 rounds - any magazine with gerat than 5 capacity is a high capacity magazine Oregon state bill SB 501
Classify any semiautomatic weapon capable of accepting a "high capacity magazine" as an "assault weapon" - Ohio state bill SB260
Ban "assault weapon"s, ie, all semiautomatic firearms.
Allow manufacturers to be sued for the actions of criminals.
Restrict the number of firearms allowed to be purchased to one per month.
End online sales of firearms, ammunition, kits and gun parts.
Pass red flag laws.
Require licensing to own a firearm, a Constitutionally protected individual right.
Mandatory training to own a firearm, a Constitutionally protected individual right
Prohibit legal personal manufacture of firearms.
Mandatory safe storage of firearms.in violation of DC v Heller.
Register all firearms, even though we can't even arrest a felon for not registering a firearm in their possession.
Limit ammuntion purchases to twice the capacity of any firearm owned per month
Require a background check for all ammunition purchases
Limit ammunition purchases to 20 rounds per month.
Ban silencers, which are legal in the UK, France and the Nordic countries, among others.