You made some far off, tangential statement and you just expect us to go along with it? Please connect the dots between meeting with American Muslim leaders a year and a half ago and the mass shooting. And try to be cogent.
Regale us on how you think BO has done a fine job combating terror.
You're absolutely right Obama doesn't care.
Soon, our apology in chief will be able to have all the muslim extremists over at his home without fear of criticism. Once he's out of the white house, he can apologize to any group he pleases without representing our country.
Now you're lying
My statement is not far off at all. The topic of this thread and the sources cited are about Obama's reluctance to call it what it is.
My comments are the only relevant facts.
Obama had terrorist group to the white house. That's what gives Americans this idea.
Now you post something relevant.
Lol you want to know why people think Obama sympathizes with terrorists.
It's because he invites them to the Presidential home! lol grow up
Regale us on how you think BO has done a fine job combating terror.
Tell me where I posted Zyphlin posted BO did a fine job combating terrorism.This is really, really complex, so try and follow close: Zyphlin never said Obama did anything. See, I know this because I read his post. Reading Is Fundamental. You should try it...
Replace Muslim terrorists with socialist terrorists and then the item has EVERYTHING to do with your thread...literally
Progressive Liberals sympathize with Muslims because it is the only group who hates traditional America more than they do.
They disserve each other.
If Muslims ever obtain total power Progressive Liberals will be the first with their heads chopped off.
If Progressive Liberals ever obtain total power Muslims will be the first in concentration camps.
Tell me where I posted Zyphlin posted BO did a fine job combating terrorism.
I see this as a quasi "when did you stop hitting your wife". Or more specifically the "fat girl in a group of friends" technique.
Trump wants to put forward the message that Obama is weak and dumb, and thus this is why this stuff happens. He then proceeds to put forward the message that the only two options are "weak and dumb" OR "intentionally allowing it".
One is overly simplistic and debatable at best, and by itself would be largely dismissed or glossed over off hand. The other, however, is ludicrous in nature. And as such, it serves as the "Fat girl in a group of friends"....by making the first option look better and more reasonable in comparison.
It's like going "Hey man, you'll race that guy. I mean, unless you're a *****"...thus trying to present two options "race or be a *****".
It's not that uncommon of a sales technique or even just a general social one; put a ludicrous option next to a bad one, and the bad one suddenly seems good.
That's very useful.
I state a fact that Obama had over members of a terrorist group to the white house, which leads most people to wonder why the President of the United States is meeting with them... you just attack me.
And you ask "Why do people think Obama sympathizes with them??"
lol
I see this as a quasi "when did you stop hitting your wife". Or more specifically the "fat girl in a group of friends" technique.
Trump wants to put forward the message that Obama is weak and dumb, and thus this is why this stuff happens. He then proceeds to put forward the message that the only two options are "weak and dumb" OR "intentionally allowing it".
One is overly simplistic and debatable at best, and by itself would be largely dismissed or glossed over off hand. The other, however, is ludicrous in nature. And as such, it serves as the "Fat girl in a group of friends"....by making the first option look better and more reasonable in comparison.
It's like going "Hey man, you'll race that guy. I mean, unless you're a *****"...thus trying to present two options "race or be a *****".
It's not that uncommon of a sales technique or even just a general social one; put a ludicrous option next to a bad one, and the bad one suddenly seems good.
You accuse me of a strawman. I want you and Zyphlin to explain why your posts aren't strawmen.So why would you want Zyphlin to tell you something he may not believe? I mean, we all know the answer, you where trying(and failing) to create a strawman. You did this because you where unable to counter a single thing Zyphlin said. You failed, and got called on it.
Replace Muslim terrorists with socialist terrorists and then the item has EVERYTHING to do with your thread...literally
BLM, dude.Dude, the Muslim Brotherhood is not a terrorist organization.
Tell me where I posted Zyphlin posted BO did a fine job combating terrorism.
BLM, dude.
BLM is a terrorist organization. That makes it pertinent to your A and B. OK, what's your definition of a terror organization, dude?A) I, much like everyone else who has called you on this, do not see the relevance of ****ing Black Lives Matter to this discussion; and
B) They are not "terrorist" organization, **** dude.
BLM is a terrorist organization. That makes it pertinent to your A and B.
BLM is a terrorist organization. That makes it pertinent to your A and B.
Nope. Just don't think Obama cares. Hence him never admitting it's Islamic terrorism. He's a coward. Come on, we've had the dude for 8 years. Haven't picked up on it? I was actually super surprised he even used the 'T' word in his speech. It's usually avoided!! Making progress.
You're saying BLM isn't a terrorist organization?Ok, so let me get this straight.
You have interpreted Trump's conspirtorial and nutjob implication that Obama sympathizes with terrorists...after an islamic terrorist attack...to mean that Trump was referencing Obama's willingness to meet with an organization that is neither a terrorist organization nor an Islamic organization?
Sure. He doesn't care. Right.
Bush didn't call it Islamic terrorism either. Would you like to take a stab at why that might be?
And Socialist are 1000 times worse. A lot of people have been killed in the name of Religion but during the 20th century Socialism killed more people than all religions have in all human history.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?