• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Proves He's a Typical Ignorant American

calamity said:
Please show where I said the Hans were the Mongols. :roll:
Click to expand...

I made a point about the Hans. You countered with "the Mongols," as though I had said anything about them. You were confused. :shrug:
 
Harshaw said:
I made a point about the Hans. You countered with "the Mongols," as though I had said anything about them. You were confused. :shrug:
Click to expand...

Uh, no.

My reply:

calamity said:
First off, Prussia is not "Germany." And being conquered by Mongols does not mean you're "part of China."
Click to expand...

To this:
Harshaw said:
It was part of the empire. :shrug:

Sorry you didn't do enough research.

And, at least half of present-day Poland was, in fact, part of Germany. And not just any old fringe slice of Germany, but Prussia.

Next: calamity tells us that Ireland was never part of the United Kingdom.
Click to expand...

There is no mention of "Han" in your post.

And, if you knew anything about the Hans, you'd know they weren't an empire nor did they ever conquere the entire Korean Peninsula.
 
calamity said:
Uh, no.

My reply:



To this:


There is no mention of "Han" in your post.

And, if you knew anything about the Hans, you'd know they never conquered the entire Korean Peninsula.
Click to expand...

Uh, you forgot this:

Harshaw said:
Korea was conquered by the Han dynasty around 100 BC.
Click to expand...

He did mention the Han Dynasty.
 
TheGoverness said:
Uh, you forgot this:



He did mention the Han Dynasty.
Click to expand...

But, in the post I quoted he called it part of the "empire." That implied Mongols more than Hans. You know, since a Dynasty is not an empire. The Hans never had an "empire." The Mongols did. But, no Mongol on earth would ever consider himself Chinese. In fact, they hate the Chinese.
 
calamity said:
But, in the post I quoted he called it part of the "empire." That implied Mongols more than Hans.
Click to expand...

No, it didn't. You just didn't bother to read or comprehend.

You're wrong, and you're grasping at straws.
 
Harshaw said:
No, it didn't. You just didn't bother to read or comprehend.

You're wrong, and you're grasping at straws.
Click to expand...

Words matter. Had you written "Dynasty," maybe you'd get the answer you were looking for. But, you wrote "empire. Your bad. Not mine. :roll:
 
ocean515 said:
I guess the boiler rooms and other Progressive Machine operations have another dog whistle topic to get the pack barking over.

I'm certainly no expert on Korea, but I found the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Korea

Gojoseon was the first Korean kingdom, located in the north of the peninsula and Manchuria, later alongside the state of Jin in the south of the peninsula.


​
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gojoseon

The historical Gojoseon kingdom was first mentioned in Chinese records in the early 7th century BC.[4] During its early phase, the capital of Gojoseon was located in Liaoning;​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liaoning

Liaoning is located in the southern part of Northeast China. In the past, it formed part of Korean kingdoms as Gojoseon,​

Seems to me this all indicates the President's statements were accurate. Wonder why HUFFPO didn't take the time to do a little research themselves?

Actually, I don't. Objective has always overruled facts in the alt-left media.
Click to expand...

"No, no, no South Korea's wrong and Trump's right." Is exactly the damage control Trump needs right now.
 
ocean515 said:
It has been proved your claim is not true.
Why try to re-write history? I would think that a difficult task to accomplish.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...



The Bible has been rewritten many times.Does the Bible have anything to do with history?

Or is it just a collection of fables?
 
calamity said:
Words matter. Had you written "Dynasty," maybe you'd get the answer you were looking for. But, you wrote "empire. Your bad. Not mine. :roll:
Click to expand...

The Han Dynasty thought they ruling an empire. I guess they should have had you around to set them straight.

Or, you know, you could know what you're talking about before you start a thread.
 
calamity said:
But, in the post I quoted he called it part of the "empire." That implied Mongols more than Hans. You know, since a Dynasty is not an empire. The Hans never had an "empire." The Mongols did. But, no Mongol on earth would ever consider himself Chinese. In fact, they hate the Chinese.
Click to expand...

I don't think that was implied there. He mentioned the Hans in the previous post, so why would he have been referring to the Mongols?

It's true that Dynasty has no direct relation to an Empire, because "dynasty" only refers to a succession and bloodline of the ruling family household. But since the Han Dynasty did expand their territory through conquest, they technically fall under the definition of an empire.
 
TheGoverness said:
I don't think that was implied there. He mentioned the Hans in the previous post, so why would he have been referring to the Mongols?

It's true that Dynasty has no direct relation to an Empire, because "dynasty" only refers to a succession and bloodline of the ruling family household. But since the Han Dynasty did expand their territory through conquest, they technically fall under the definition of an empire.
Click to expand...

How the **** am I supposed to remember what he referenced in a previous post when he is talking "empire" in the post I replied to? Han was a Dynasty, not an empire. He should get his semantic ducks in a row. When someone talks Empire from East Asia, I immediately think Mongols.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire
 
Harshaw said:
The Han Dynasty thought they ruling an empire. I guess they should have had you around to set them straight.

Or, you know, you could know what you're talking about before you start a thread.
Click to expand...

Spin away. Why do you not just admit you used the wrong word?

Can't do it. Can ya?
 
Harshaw said:
It did. Calamity might deny it, though.
Click to expand...

Well, according to your illogical spin, re: Korea part of China; the fact that Texas was once a part of Mexico, the entire US was once part of Mexico. You know, since the only part of Korea that the Han Dynasty controlled was the North. :roll:
 
calamity said:
Spin away. Why do you not just admit you used the wrong word?

Can't do it. Can ya?
Click to expand...

Your problem is that I didn't.

Calamity: "you didn't say the Roman empire conquered Gaul! You said CAESAR did!!!!"
^^^^
This is what you're doing right now.
 
calamity said:
Well, according to your illogical spin, re: Korea part of China; the fact that Texas was once a part of Mexico, the entire US was once part of Mexico. You know, since the only part of Korea that the Han Dynasty controlled was the North. :roll:
Click to expand...

No. This is just desperation. From someone presuming to lecture other people on words meaning things.

Once again: you should know what you're talking about BEFORE you start a thread.

But hey, tell me more about how Prussia wasn't a part of Germany.
 
Winston said:
"No, no, no South Korea's wrong and Trump's right." Is exactly the damage control Trump needs right now.
Click to expand...

South Korea? No, that would be some people mentioned in the dog whistle from HuffPo.

History proves what President Trump commented on was true.

I can understand the pride of some South Koreans would compel them to comment negatively to this fact.
 
calamity said:
How the **** am I supposed to remember what he referenced in a previous post when he is talking "empire" in the post I replied to?
Click to expand...

If you can't follow a point for more than one post, that's on you.

calamity said:
When someone talks Empire from East Asia, I immediately think Mongols.
Click to expand...

You being unaware of any other East Asian empire really is no one's problem but your own.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom