Regime change is inevitable because Ayatollah Khamenei is 86 years old. The only question is what happens when he dies? Will his son and heir be crowned the next Supreme Leader in a smooth transition? Will Ayatollah Larijani murder him and seize power? Or will the Iranian people sack up and put an end to this Islamic reign of terror?
Cosmetically tattooed eyeliner does not run.
If we're going back 40-50+ years, I have some news for you
The secession plan is already in place.
That would result in a huge rebellion. the Ayatollah would be considered a martyr.
Not going to happen. More hate the US than hate the regime
Once Trump pulled us out of the agreement with them regarding nuclear weapons programs, Iran started going once again in enriching uranium and such.
Iran never stopped enriching uranium and they were never compliant with that agreement.
Whatever you need to tell yourself for glory of Dear Leader.
The fact remains that Iran never stopped enriching uranium (and it won’t because it needs that fuel for its reactors) and was never compliant with the agreement. The fact remains that Iran is doing what it has always done in enriching uranium (next level? lol). The fact remains that diplomacy has never succeeded in non-proliferation anywhere it has been tried. Those are the inconvenient truths.
Ahh, Yes. OK.
Despite the fact the he pre-rolled them under the bus.
10,000 leagues less cartoonish than what they were responding to.
Source = "Trust me, bro".
This: "they may very well use it when they make one."
Dude, wrong subject. You claimed they were moving on with their program under Obama. Trump ended that. This "assessment" is after Trump tore up the JCPOA.Atomic watchdog says Iran not complying with nuclear safeguards
The UN-backed atomic watchdog passed a resolution on Thursday declaring that Iran is not complying with its obligations regarding nuclear non-proliferation.news.un.org
Just say you don’t understand the science or Iran’s nuclear weapons program and move on.
They were far more compliant with the agreement than they were without though, and it's leaving that agreement that resulted on them ramping up their program. If the JCPOA was such a failure, it would be odd for Trump to be working on a deal very similar to it this go around.
if they had briefed no one, that would still be bad and likely unconstitutional, but this proves it was not about "keeping it secret."
You didn’t read it.
Yeah that was her first one eh.
So your argument is shades of non-compliance? Explain in detail what you mean by “more compliant” and the science behind why you believe that.
At least not for as long as they take to rebuild their nuclear weapons and their ICBM programs.
Definitely in the first group.
www.whitehouse.gov
You do know when Trump ended the JCPOA right?