CaughtInThe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 144,987
- Reaction score
- 165,602
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
https://www.peterbergen.com/7133-2/If you can't pull a quote from somewhere, fine. I'm not reading a 504 page book on it to find a statement you said he made.
Enjoy the war, terrorist attacks, lack of labor and higher prices."Most qualified candidates" ever!
Nope. Try to keep up with the conversation.
Debatable.
You should learn some history.Lol. You should get a grip.
America and Israel are doing what nobody else is dumb enough to try.America and Israel are doing something no other state had the courage to do.
That is, rid the region of a state that promotes terror throughout the Middle East.
Tell us, Iranian apologist, what do you think Iran represents in that region? What purpose do they serve? What have they done for almost 50 years but spread their radical Islamic ideology?
OK, now let us hear you apologize for a terrorist state that serves no useful purpose whatsoever in that region of the world.
Absolutely relevant given the whining in this thread about Iran saying mean stuff about the US or whatever.Not relevant to anything I said. I swear, if someone commented that banana splits taste good, you would come back with some shit like whatabout 'dem South American tyrants the US supported.
Al Qaeda wasn’t a country capable of being nuked. The equation doesn’t hold upI know, right? They'd never try that!
Why would anyone fly planes into the Twin Towers?
A Duly Elected President that an opposition voter did not vote for also known as “Not my president”. imhoWhat's an "illegal President?"
and again, instead of discussion on how you supported Obama and Biden bombing ..... but hate Trump bombing .... you point 'oh look oh look oh look"
get better , please
I haven't read that it has officially other than the vows of retaliation.Has Iran declared war on the USA?
No one said it was, so congrats on the senseless comment.Is it President Gabbard? Nope.
Well, that's what the intelligence reports concluded. So if the president isn't listening to his own intelligence agencies, who is he getting information from?Of course, if she'd been the lone voice in favor of the attack, that's what you'd be calling Trump.
Is that the official standing of the United States, that Iran is not working towards a nuclear weapon? Again, nope.
You actually don't seem to know much about anything related to this unfortunately. Those "minority voices" are the same ones expecting Trump to not do this exact kind of thing because he campaigned on not doing precisely this. Then again, MAGAverse types seem perfectly willing to throw their own under the bus at the drop of a hat, so it shouldn't be too surprising. In none of your response did you manage to produce a reasoned retort other than "nuh-uh".You foolishly want to pick out minority opinions and isolated information in your quest to mislead and misinform, right out of the leftist playbook.
I told you, I know your tactics better than you do.
In response, 16% of Americans said yes, 60% said no, and 24% said they were unsure. Notably, just 19% of respondents who said they voted for Donald Trump in 2024 wanted the U.S. to get involved, with 53% opposed. All self-identified Republicans were opposed 53% to 22%.Do you think the U.S. military should get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran?
HHhmm.....
Doom and gloom suggests you are thinking the worst will happen.
And if you really believe the U.S. bombed Iran because of their skin color, then you really need to brush up on the U.S.-Iranian relationship over the past 45 years.
Trump could absolutely have been lying, or it could have been a deliberate mildec. My guess as to this particular is the latter, but, who knows. Regardless, the stated intent was to forestall - not destroy - a nuclear bomb.They're saying this was the plan and that the whole "decide in 2 weeks" press release was camouflage, to surprise Iran.
So...TACO was lying or was TACO was using strategy, hiding his true intentions in order to better position our outcome?![]()
Remind us when during Obama's tenure Israel led an aerial attack against Iran that the US followed up with additional attacks in order to destroy Iran's nuclear sites rather than negotiating an agreement.
It’s a valid question which will soon be answered. Let me ask you a question. If Iran sent a ballistic nuclear weapon into Israel would radiation be detected?Not being a jerk when I ask this - but if there was nuclear material that we hit, wouldn’t something be detecting radiation of some sort?
Is that being detected at any level?
You'll kindly remind me of that because I do not recall that being covered. The Obama administration certainly bombed several countries in the Middle East, but I do not remember Iran being one of them since that would have been a big deal back then.Just point out - Obama did indeed launch a joint attack against Iranian nuclear facilities with the Israelies.
First time I saw this question.I didn’t get an answer yet, @Crunchtime
You'll kindly remind me of that because I do not recall that being covered.
The Obama administration certainly bombed several countries in the Middle East, but I do not remember Iran being one of them since that would have been a big deal back then.