• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Transgender Teacher Catches Parents by Surprise

Kayleigh Katz said:
Well... either good for me or bad for Bodi, I guess it depends on your point of view.
Click to expand...

WRONG! Bad for Tucker's family... why would that be bad for me? :rofl

Don't let all of the facts that I have thrashed you with stop you from committing more acts of adultery or anything...
Screw Tucker's brains out. Unleash the hounds!


PS I can see that I am indeed, your conscious. Yeah! ;)



PPS Don't let that one thread ruin our relationship, dear Kayleigh.
 
Tucker Case said:
No that makes it crazy. "Silly" is rubbing one's nuts on a watermelon for luck. Crazy is chopping them up because you feel bad about their shape.
Click to expand...

They're not mutually exclusive.
 
StoneCrow said:
They're not mutually exclusive.
Click to expand...

They're in the same family of personality traits, if you ask me. Silly is Crazy's first cousin. They are just differring degrees of lunacy.

I believe the technical order of the terms goes like this:

Goofy, Giddy, Silly, Nuts, Bonkers, Looney, Crazy, Bug-nuts crazy, Crazier than a shit-house rat, Insane, Lunatic, and Bat-shit.
 
Last edited:
Tucker Case said:
They're in the same family of personality traits, if you ask me. Silly is Crazy's first cousin. They are just differring degrees of lunacy.

I believe the technical order of the terms goes like this:

Goofy, Giddy, Silly, Nuts, Bonkers, Looney, Crazy, Bug-nuts crazy, Crazier than a shit-house rat, Insane, Lunatic, and Bat-shit.
Click to expand...

But isn't it possible to rub one's nuts on a watermelon for luck, then chop them up because you feel bad about their shape?
 
Tucker Case said:
Yes, but the two acts are separate. One is silly, one is crazy.
Click to expand...

Actually, no. They are not two acts, but a single act altogether. Which is neither crazy or silly. It's stupid, which is an entire category by itself. The luck generated from the rubbing is negated by the chopping of the giblets. That, my friends, is just wasted luck and very stupid.
 
Tucker Case said:
Yes, but the two acts are separate. One is silly, one is crazy.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily.
Can't rubbing watermelons on balls be deemed crazy?
Can't chopping off balls be deemed silly?
 
StoneCrow said:
Not necessarily.
Can't rubbing watermelons on balls be deemed crazy?
Can't chopping off balls be deemed silly?
Click to expand...

Yes and no respectively. Those designations are the minimum designations for those behaviors.

Rubing one's nuts on watermelons for luck is silly. Doing so because your dog told you to is crazy.


Chopping off one's balls because you are bothered by their shape is crazy. Chopping off the balls because your dog told you to is bat-****

Rubbing one's nuts on a watermellon is never just goofy. It's always at least silly, and can go all the up way to bat-**** dependeing on what conditions led to the rubbing. But it can never go below "silly".

Just like Chopping off one's nuts is neve rless than crazy. :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
Sorry to resurrect this month old thread, but I stumbled onto it and wanted to voice my opinion.

I read through the entire thread, and I can't say I'm surprised at the misunderstanding of what the state of transsexuality actually is. Transsexuality, or the broader umbrella of transgenderism, are not about becoming anything, they are about being yourself. This is the fundamental misunderstanding that I see guiding people's opinions about transpeople.

Once in a while on the internet I'll read someone's opinion saying that transsexuality is a mental disorder that needs to be addressed as a psychosis. The fact is, people express their gender in many different ways, and that fact cannot simply have a line drawn through it. If I can resort to stereotypes, compare a lumberjack to a yuppie. Very different forms of personal expression. Would you consider either of these expressions psychotic? It's not delusional to act masculine if you feel masculine, it's not delusional to act femme if you feel femme.

While Gender Identity Disorder is listed as a mental disorder, it stands out as the only one that can be "cured" by letting people be themselves. If you really think about it, the only disorder is our culture's enforcement of strict gender lines that cannot ever be crossed. Why can't we let people be who they are? That's what it comes down to. It's not about genitals or surgery, as most people in this thread have focused on, it's about not bottling up your emotions and trying so hard to act like something you're not.

I'm trans myself, and it really bothers me how people who truly have no idea what it's like to be trans, nor even go out of their way to attempt to understand, make ignorant opinions and decisions that really affect us. Having a couple "friends" who are trans does not mean you necessarily get it. If you're completely ignorant about a subject, why make statements you can't take back?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom