- Joined
- Feb 26, 2019
- Messages
- 37,399
- Reaction score
- 15,952
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Ascii emote for laughing and squinting. Basically thisXD? what is that?
Ascii emote for laughing and squinting. Basically thisXD? what is that?
Ascii emote for laughing and squinting. Basically this
Its all goodI looked on the Google machine before I asked you, they are unaware.
You read the rest of my post. Do not disrespect me.
and learn.
This is how the gun nuts turned me against guns. They were so extreme that I just said **** it, there is no reasoning with these agenda driven dolts and so now I am anti gun.
Here's the thing. The studies you posted, I don't believe that they're wrong. But what you're doing is focusing so much on a couple of trees in the forest that you miss the rest of the forest. The transphobes are so hell-bent on the belief that trans girl athletes have advantages over cis girl athletes, as if that rare-to-nonexistent occurrence negates all the disadvantages trans people are forced to face.
So if you'll take a bigger look at the forest, perhaps I'll give your trees another chance. And not until then.
I tend to not let my opponents dictate my advocacy. Ive seen incredibly toxic trans people like chaosismel, does not change one iota of my beliefs.
I am not sure what you are advocating.
Forest and trees? I am supposed to understand that?Then you're not reading a word that I'm saying. That or you're letting your imagination distort what I'm saying. How about actually reading what I'm actually saying instead?
True. Im speaking more on the level of activists and personal experiences with them dont change my beliefs. If i hold a strong belief, it wouldnt matter how toxic people are to me who may advocate the same.Every barrel has a couple of bad apples. The problem is that just like with any disadvantaged group, trans people's bad apples are held as examples of the entire group.
Conservatives don't care if someone is a problem to society.
If they are different from the 1950s ideal of a white family, the conservatives will attack them.
True. Im speaking more on the level of activists and personal experiences with them dont change my beliefs. If i hold a strong belief, it wouldnt matter how toxic people are to me who may advocate the same.
Blair White? Chaosismel?I know of one really toxic trans woman YouTuber, whom I won't give the time of day. I know some much better ones, too, such as Contrapoints.
Blair White? Chaosismel?
True though i think the crowd she is going with is probably going to tell her that her usefulness has expired, at that point it wont be good for her.Yes, Blair White. I feel somewhat sorry for her; she has a traumatic past, and she's using attention to try to heal that trauma. She doesn't need attention; she needs help.
But why is it okay for a man to hit a woman and not a man? Because the only reason I've seen is that women are all weaker and less capable, and thus should be handled with kiddie gloves, an idea which is extremely patronizing to women.
Not to mention it doesn't apply here since the transman in question was a competitor in a wrestling match who'd made it to the final round. Clearly this is not a person who is weak or incapable. Do you know how insulting it would be to be told "yeah, I can't fight you because you're weaker than me and you'll get hurt." It shows a complete lack of respect for the other party's efforts.
Sure injuries can happen, but this isn't some unrestrained beatdown. It's supervised and there's someone to step in if things go to far. There's no reason to believe this transman was going to die that day.
For those genuinely interested in the sports issue there is a non-partisan working group comprised of many athletes, some trans, some gay, some doctors, some lawyers. All want to find a solution that is as fair as possible, knowing that it will be imperfect. Those without a political axe to grind will be open to reading some of what this group has to say.
https://womenssportspolicy.org/about-us/
"Our mission is to affirm the legal permissibility of separate girls’ and women’s competitive sport teams while including all trans girls and trans women under the girls’ and women’s sports umbrella. We reject both the effort to exclude trans girls and trans women from girls’ and women’s sport and the effort to disadvantage females by forcing them to compete against some trans athletes with male sex-linked physical advantages. There is a middle way."
Give the t;dr for their plan.how do they equalize transwoman and woman sports? What is the middle way they have?
Go straight to the FAQ if you want it distilled down and simple to understand. I encourage you to read more, though. The FAQ answers pretty much all the questions people are asking and keeps it very short and simple.
Frequently Asked Questions - Women's Sports Policy Working Group
I. ABOUT SCIENCE AND SEX Download all questions/answers in this section (PDF) II. ABOUT CURRENT LAW ON SEX AND SPORTS Download all questions/answers in this section (PDF) III. ABOUT POLICYwomenssportspolicy.org
Sometimes a willingness to engage in good faith makes a lot of differenceThanks. I didn't read it, but saw a pretty little graphic that attracted my eyes and seemed to explain it. I've been feeling lazy the past few days.
Basically:
1) no male puberty - unlimited access
2) male puberty but on hormones - no head to head competition
3) male puberty and hormones - can play.
Anyway, I have issues with it, but whatever. It's a tough one.
Here's the thing. The studies you posted, I don't believe that they're wrong. But what you're doing is focusing so much on a couple of trees in the forest that you miss the rest of the forest. The transphobes are so hell-bent on the belief that trans girl athletes have advantages over cis girl athletes, as if that rare-to-nonexistent occurrence negates all the disadvantages trans people are forced to face.
So if you'll take a bigger look at the forest, perhaps I'll give your trees another chance. And not until then.
Demanding females accept their place is serving males and males will do all the hard physical things because males are superior to females at everything - even at being women - how progressive Democrat of you.
Why not just say what you think: that females should shut up, put on their burka and stay home servicing males because the superior males should run everything. Why beat around the bush? Just say it outright.
Here's the thing. The studies you posted, I don't believe that they're wrong. But what you're doing is focusing so much on a couple of trees in the forest that you miss the rest of the forest. The transphobes are so hell-bent on the belief that trans girl athletes have advantages over cis girl athletes, as if that rare-to-nonexistent occurrence negates all the disadvantages trans people are forced to face.
So if you'll take a bigger look at the forest, perhaps I'll give your trees another chance. And not until then.