• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

To all of you trying to excuse Vladimir Putin

🧐

0f94ef4cef9c99dbd069dd064c6ccb8b855df6f8.jpg


51922c30c5e251b562ad76050dbd5eb57cf2cb43.png


33dc5f487bf1d1a846b1750fa4d9b6163eefe225.jpg








Sometimes you have to wonder whether they are dumb as doorknobs or if they are actually working for putin.

If I were to bet Russian agents being run by Russian Intelligence officers every time I would come out way ahead in the end.
 
In which plane of existence does your post make sense?
Same plane as when Sleepy pissed himself in front of the Pope and then had Camilla in stitches as he farted loudly in the company of British Royals .

Even if it is a double, the Sleepy character has done more than any other American to drag his country down to the toilet level .
 
It’s been explained. That you refuse to acknowledge that is YOUR problem. You need to quit listening to liars like Tucker.
the only way it was explained in that thread was "either you don't have any questions about this story , or you are a conspiracy nutter!"

a very irrational take I must say.

perhaps you could direct me to where it was explained otherwise? I mean Sh*t I am totally against Putin invading Ukraine, but I don't feel the need to try to destroy possible news to at least see what that means when they are "Afraid it will fall into Russian hands".

WHO are you afraid this will bite in the ass?
 
the only way it was explained in that thread was "either you don't have any questions about this story , or you are a conspiracy nutter!"

a very irrational take I must say.

perhaps you could direct me to where it was explained otherwise? I mean Sh*t I am totally against Putin invading Ukraine, but I don't feel the need to try to destroy possible news to at least see what that means when they are "Afraid it will fall into Russian hands".

WHO are you afraid this will bite in the ass?

Thank you for proving my point that you are listening to the conspiracy theories of Tucker and his ilk instead of ACTUALLY trying to find the truth of the matter. It is as I fully expected.
 
Yeah he only tried to overthrow a fair and democratic election...

He wanted to be a dictator for life... No danger there..
Without knowing I would bet deep down Trump admires what Putin is doing in Ukraine ..only if he could be as tough as a Putin or a Kim Jong-un, If only.
 
Without knowing I would bet deep down Trump admires what Putin is doing in Ukraine ..only if he could be as tough as a Putin or a Kim Jong-un, If only.
Trump wishes that he:
- could lie shamelessly as good as Putin and Lavrov. Sorry Donnie, you learned in Manhattan Real Estate...they learned as Russian Intelligence officers...NO COMPARISON
- had the sort of half assed, half baked, fake democracy they have in Russia so he could just be "elected" to perpetuity like Putin can
- had the sort of control over ALL media that Putin has
- had a military that he could just order anywhere, use and use up as he pleases. Donnie would likely invade Mexico if he did
 
in other words , once again , any narrative that goes against your mainstream.

russia did start this war, russia did have a choice, but when an official in the US government states that there WERE biological facilities in Ukraine then it makes me want more information, unlike you who need EVERYTHING to agree with you or you can;t stand it.


And now, the truth to putin's lies.


From the article:

There is no evidence to support the claims, which President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, the White House, the Pentagon and the State Department have all unequivocally denied.
There are biological laboratories inside Ukraine, and since 2005, the United States has provided backing to a number of institutions to prevent the production of biological weapons. But Tucker Carlson, the Fox News host, and others have misleadingly cited remarks from American officials as proof that the labs are producing or conducting research on biological weapons.
“Out of nowhere, the Biden official in charge of Ukraine confirmed the story,” Mr. Carlson said on his program Thursday night. “Victoria Nuland, the under secretary of state, casually mentioned in a Senate hearing on Tuesday that actually, yes, the Biden administration does fund a series of biolabs in Ukraine.”
Mr. Carlson also pointed to an interview with Robert Pope, the director of the Pentagon’s Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, which helps countries in the former Soviet Union secure or eliminate nuclear and chemical weapons.
“As Pope put it, scientists are scientists, they don’t want to destroy all the bioweapons,” Mr. Carlson continued in his segment. “Instead, they’re using them to conduct new bioweapons research — that’s what he said.”
Mr. Carlson mischaracterized those remarks from Ms. Nuland and Mr. Pope.
In congressional testimony this week, Ms. Nuland, the under secretary of state for political affairs, was asked by Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, whether Ukraine has chemical or biological weapons.
“Ukraine has biological research facilities which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces, may be seeking to gain control of,” she responded. “So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.”
If there were a biological or chemical weapon attack inside Ukraine, Mr. Rubio asked, would there be any doubt that Russia was behind it?
“There is no doubt in my mind, Senator, and it is classic Russian technique to blame the other guy what they’re planning to do themselves,” Ms. Nuland responded.
The State Department said Ms. Nuland was referring to Ukrainian diagnostic and biodefense laboratories during her testimony, which are different from biological weapons facilities. Rather, these biodefense laboratories counter biological threats throughout the country, the department said.
Mr. Rubio made the same clarification in another congressional hearing on Thursday, noting that “there’s a difference between a bioweapons facility and one that’s doing research.”
In referring to Mr. Pope on Thursday, Mr. Carlson was distorting a February interview Mr. Pope gave to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, a nonprofit organization and publication.

“There is no place that still has any of the sort of infrastructure for researching or producing biological weapons,” Mr. Pope said. “Scientists being scientists, it wouldn’t surprise me if some of these strain collections in some of these laboratories still have pathogen strains that go all the way back to the origins of that program.”
 
##
And now, the truth to putin's lies.


From the article:

There is no evidence to support the claims, which President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, the White House, the Pentagon and the State Department have all unequivocally denied.
There are biological laboratories inside Ukraine, and since 2005, the United States has provided backing to a number of institutions to prevent the production of biological weapons. But Tucker Carlson, the Fox News host, and others have misleadingly cited remarks from American officials as proof that the labs are producing or conducting research on biological weapons.
“Out of nowhere, the Biden official in charge of Ukraine confirmed the story,” Mr. Carlson said on his program Thursday night. “Victoria Nuland, the under secretary of state, casually mentioned in a Senate hearing on Tuesday that actually, yes, the Biden administration does fund a series of biolabs in Ukraine.”
Mr. Carlson also pointed to an interview with Robert Pope, the director of the Pentagon’s Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, which helps countries in the former Soviet Union secure or eliminate nuclear and chemical weapons.
“As Pope put it, scientists are scientists, they don’t want to destroy all the bioweapons,” Mr. Carlson continued in his segment. “Instead, they’re using them to conduct new bioweapons research — that’s what he said.”
Mr. Carlson mischaracterized those remarks from Ms. Nuland and Mr. Pope.
In congressional testimony this week, Ms. Nuland, the under secretary of state for political affairs, was asked by Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, whether Ukraine has chemical or biological weapons.
“Ukraine has biological research facilities which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces, may be seeking to gain control of,” she responded. “So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.”
If there were a biological or chemical weapon attack inside Ukraine, Mr. Rubio asked, would there be any doubt that Russia was behind it?
“There is no doubt in my mind, Senator, and it is classic Russian technique to blame the other guy what they’re planning to do themselves,” Ms. Nuland responded.
The State Department said Ms. Nuland was referring to Ukrainian diagnostic and biodefense laboratories during her testimony, which are different from biological weapons facilities. Rather, these biodefense laboratories counter biological threats throughout the country, the department said.
Mr. Rubio made the same clarification in another congressional hearing on Thursday, noting that “there’s a difference between a bioweapons facility and one that’s doing research.”
In referring to Mr. Pope on Thursday, Mr. Carlson was distorting a February interview Mr. Pope gave to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, a nonprofit organization and publication.

“There is no place that still has any of the sort of infrastructure for researching or producing biological weapons,” Mr. Pope said. “Scientists being scientists, it wouldn’t surprise me if some of these strain collections in some of these laboratories still have pathogen strains that go all the way back to the origins of that program.”

Unfortunately, you’re talking to the equivalent of a stump.
 
Back
Top Bottom