Can you point to this condemnation?
I didn't see it.
Counter protesting is not anti free speech. It's also protected under free speech. Do want anybody counter protesting to criminalized and charged with a crime or something?
Then you're admitting what Trump tweeted was deceitful and not factual. Why would he tweet something like that? He is the president. People are watching his tweeter. The president should not be tweeting fake news. And why would he see the counter protestors like that and condemn them so quickly, but when it was Charlottesville he had to "wait for all the facts."
Like Cardinal said, you are very dishonest poster. Trump clearly spoke out about the counter protestors as police agitators. He tweeted fake news. The BPD didn't confirm anything about that tweet. lol
Wow...
And, BTW, the founders gave us all the right to bear arms. :lol:
I know this is off topic and everything, and I also know this post will probably anger you and every NRA member but the founding fathers didn't give us the right to bear arms. The founders, the first congress, gave state militias the right to bear arms. Since the US has a standiing army, the second amendment isn't even applicable to the original use of the second amendment deemed by the founders.
Future SCOTUS have misinterpreted the second amendment to be an absolute right for Americans to bear arms.
I'm guessing most of those guns are illegal. Take them away, and the violence stops? You sound like a babe in the woods. They's use rocks and sticks if that was all they had. Dear God.I know if, for example, the west and south sides of Chicago were forced to give up their guns and federal 'militias' were called in to maintain peace and facilitate the removal of weapons in the south and west sides, there'd be peace. IMO, the only way to obtain peace in the south and west sides of Chicago. It's time to call in another gang of 'untouchables' to Chicago's south and west sides.
People are willing to sacrifice other's first amendment rights. Are they also willing to sacrifice other's second amendment rights?
What kind of f*ed up concerts are you going to?
I think you need to reread the second amendment, as you have completely missed the part about "the right of the people to keep and bear arms". Any idea what the means? Unless, of course, you think the founders were trying to create a Police State.
I'm guessing most of those guns are illegal. Take them away, and the violence stops? You sound like a babe in the woods. They's use rocks and sticks if that was all they had. Dear God.
Lmao, that dude is straight lying man. I've been to many concerts, and I'd definitely remember flying urine.
https://twitter.com/qwrrty/status/898998545088299008
An account of how BLM marshalls escorted Nazi's and prevented riots. My favourite line:
"BLM organizers have said over and over again: if a rally turns violent, POC will be targeted. Don't start none."
edit: POC refers to people of colour.
Here's the second amendment. 'A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.' i've also read (and you should to) the book The First Congress by Fergus M. Bordewich. The book mentions the odd wording of the second amendment. How the wording was changed from the original second amendment proposal by J. Madison to be ratified by the congress in 1789. How the Whiskey Rebellion and the Shay's Rebellion (both rebellions were supplied by guns owned by militias) gave pause to the congress in their thoughts of giving an absolute right to gun ownership.
The young US was defended by state militias at the time of the writing of the second amendment. Individuals owned the guns in state militias. There was no standing army for the US whose guns are supplied by the government.
They're just the pillars of the community aren't they? No wonder so many communities are crumbling.
Tell us more about what some rando dude on Twitter said though. That's real proof.
Gtfo of here man. Police officers DO NOT deserve to have urine thrown in their face. It is NOT normal. I don't care about what happens at a festival in England, we're in the United States, where you don't disrespect someone like that.
I was there. I saw it happen. And they're right - when things get violent, it's people of color who get blamed and who are targeted. Yet another manifestation of white privilege.
Tell me, how many BLM organizers have you seen/spoken to in real life? Or do you get all your information about BLM from Fox?
Sadly, it is becoming more and more apparent that this whole protest driven culture is a feckless effort of the young, disenfranchised, unempleyed, uneducated, tattooed, pierced, and stoned idiots between the ages of 16 and 50 to become relevant. What a bunch of smelly, slovenly, STD infested losers. They're ignorant, but they sure are arrogant. What tragic, pathetic failures.
Don't play stupid games with me. You said, "Racists weren't slated to show up." and I showed you where the KKK said they'd be there. That's all there is to that exchange, spin and weasel how you will.
And the word's 'indict'. You're welcome.
Here's the second amendment: 'A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.' i've also read (and you should to) the book The First Congress by Fergus M. Bordewich. The book mentions the odd wording of the second amendment. How the wording was changed from the original second amendment proposal by J. Madison to be ratified by the congress in 1789. How the Whiskey Rebellion and the Shay's Rebellion (both rebellions were supplied by guns owned by militias) gave pause to the congress in their thoughts of giving an absolute right to gun ownership.
The young US was defended by state militias at the time of the writing of the second amendment. Individuals owned the guns in state militias. There was no standing army for the US whose guns are supplied by the government.
It's been reported by news sources that racist groups said they would show up.
If anybody condemns Nazis and then is doxxed, that's an entirely different issue than doxxing actual nazi marchers. Doxxing nazi marches is an entirely different debate. You are pretty much acting like a right wing version of a liberal who calls anybody right a Marx a nazi. FYI, people still have rights in this country, including neo nazis. If some kind of group starts doxxing people and calling them nazis just for sport, I highly doubt the average American will settle for that type of harassment so cool down.
I am sure some right wing media will share you opinions. I really enjoyed your post where you argued that nazis couldn't have been there, because Antifa didn't knock the **** out of anybody. That was a classic post.
I never said they did deserve that to happen. But some thrown urine is very different from say... driving a car through a bunch of people.
At large gatherings, especially under tense or charged situations, some people get rowdy. This is a scene after an ice hockey game.
The police proved once again, through the restraint they showed today, that black people are the biggest threat to black people, not the police.
Lol you've never been to a concert where bottles of piss get thrown?
It's pretty gross but when people are in big crowds, bathrooms are miles away, would never find their friends again if they left etc it happens all the time. Mainly rock stuff.
The police need not be the biggest threat to oppose racially driven police brutality. And to characterize gangs and crime as "black people" is racist.
Hitler had brown hair fyi
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?