• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This is GREAT!

calamity said:
Rightfully so.Americans are playing right into his hands.
Click to expand...

they're all playing into his hands.
who do you think central europe will turn to when merkle and her eu squad alienate them?
 
beefheart said:
Someone please tell me what law was broken here?

Again, both sides paid for this, but that doesn't matter.

What matters is what is in the dossier.

Another Volsrock thread FAIL
Click to expand...
We are going to need to assign a special prosecutor with a broad scope to allow him to go wherever he wants to find the answer to your question.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
Superfly said:
Stop deflecting the question. You are complaining about something that the Democratic party is doing, that originated with the Republican party.

Do you or do you not find that hypocritical?
Click to expand...

I find it to be your admission that Hillary colluded with the Russians in order to influence the election and now you want to deflect the fact that she did it.
 
volsrock said:
RUSSIA SCRIPT FLIPPED...
Top Hillary lawyer lied for YEAR about dossier...
MESS: Pressure builds on Mueller to recuse himself...
FBI On Hot Seat...
Busted Media Downplay Revelations...
TRUMP: 'HOAX IS TURNED AROUND'...


:lamo:lamo:lamo
Click to expand...

And there you have it folks. No need to stand in line at the grocery store. The National Enquirer headlines have been brought to your home.
 
Last edited:
Moderate Right said:
I find it to be your admission that Hillary colluded with the Russians in order to influence the election and now you want to deflect the fact that she did it.
Click to expand...

That is an absolutely ridiculous interpretation of what really happened.
 
HowardBThiname said:
That makes Hillary downright deplorable.
Click to expand...

Opposition research makes one deplorable? Then I guess you are more mad at the republican who started fudning this dossier before the Hillary campaign picked it up. And I'm sure as hell this makes you mad....

Wikileaks confirms approach from Trump campaign

The editor of Wikileaks is confirming that the group was approached by a data firm working for President Donald Trump’s campaign during the 2016 election.

Julian Assange says on Twitter that Cambridge Analytica reached out to his group prior to last November, but Wikileaks rejected the company’s “approach.” Assange isn’t specifying the content of that approach.​
 
countryboy said:
There's been no evidence produced to date, of your claim. The Clinton's however, have a long standing relationship with Russian oligarchs. Does that bother you?
Click to expand...

Except for junior's meeting of course.
 
jimbo said:
It's both
Click to expand...

Not really. It had been established that Russia engaged in an effort to sabotage the elections. Everyone knows this except Trump and his supporters. What hasn't been established is that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians. Hillary buying opposition research from an American research firm is not colluding. It's not even close. Only the most deluded partisan would think that it was.
 
calamity said:
That is an absolutely ridiculous interpretation of what really happened.
Click to expand...

You guys have boiled it down to "but Trump did it to, as well as Hillary, so let's just talk about Trump".
 
I don't think that the DNC or Hillary campaign (or both) paying for oppo research is that big a deal, although the contents of what they paid for makes it look less than admirable, and frankly, foolish for paying for such salacious garbage.

More concerning is how that oppo research, largely unvetted, found it's way to the FBI and for use as part of a FISA court surveillance request, as well as into the presidential daily briefing.
 
Moderate Right said:
But you just said "the other side of the swamp", which acknowledges that there are TWO sides of the swamp.
Click to expand...

Yeah both sides. Trump is just the swamp thing.
 
bearpoker said:
Except for junior's meeting of course.
Click to expand...

Junior's meeting? Really, that's all you've got? What does that have to do with Hillary, and Uranium One? Did junior allow 20% of our uranium to be sold to Russia? Did junior receive $500,000 for a speech in Moscow? Did junior have a foundation which had $140,000,000 funneled to it from Russian interests? No, junior was baited into a meeting with a Russian lawyer under the guise of opposition research, and as soon as the ruse was revealed, he bailed. No comparison.

That's fine, let this thing blow up in your face. You could take the high road, but it's not the lib way. I get it.
 
bearpoker said:
Not really. It had been established that Russia engaged in an effort to sabotage the elections. Everyone knows this except Trump and his supporters. What hasn't been established is that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians. Hillary buying opposition research from an American research firm is not colluding. It's not even close. Only the most deluded partisan would think that it was.
Click to expand...

If opposition research by Hillary was all this entailed you might have a point. It's not, and, you don't. ;)
 
Moderate Right said:
I find it to be your admission that Hillary colluded with the Russians in order to influence the election and now you want to deflect the fact that she did it.
Click to expand...

I never said that, and the gist of my comment was not that "Trump did it too," but more so that "They both did it, so why are you yammering about one and not the other?" If they both did it, they should both be the subject of commentary - not just Hillary and the DNC.

My comment was about the hypocricy of the OP.
 
poweRob said:
Opposition research makes one deplorable? Then I guess you are more mad at the republican who started fudning this dossier before the Hillary campaign picked it up. And I'm sure as hell this makes you mad....
Click to expand...

There's nothing wrong with honest opposition research -- there's something wrong with having a bogus dossier drawn up to smear your opposition. And then lying about having any connection to it. LOL
 
beefheart said:
Someone please tell me what law was broken here?

Again, both sides paid for this, but that doesn't matter.

What matters is what is in the dossier.

Another Volsrock thread FAIL
Click to expand...

The AT's can shutup about the collusion bull****.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom