• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The 'Smartest Man In The Room' Just Joined Sidney Powell's Team

But. you said, without proof. How does one uphold the law being broken without proof that it is being broken?

MAGA people don't care about proof. They just want their orange Jesus.
 
Who knows. Different times, Different type case.

According to Trump the DOJ and FBI may still be against him. He stated that they may be involved in the election fraud.
How does that happen when the heads of those agencies are his picks.
And don't forget, Trump's picks for judges are ruling against him, as well. They are all conspiring against him.
 
Noted top expert in cyber security
------------------------

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia's name may not mean a lot to you, but it's one of the weightiest names in the world when it comes to sniffing out cyber-security problems.


We know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because, just two and a half months ago, the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a massive, multi-million-dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran against the American intelligence and military communities. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good:

Damn, I thought it was Jim Hoft.
 
Noted top expert in cyber security
------------------------

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia's name may not mean a lot to you, but it's one of the weightiest names in the world when it comes to sniffing out cyber-security problems.


We know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because, just two and a half months ago, the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a massive, multi-million-dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran against the American intelligence and military communities. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good:

Sidney Powell? Wasn’t she supposed to be the brilliant, revered attorney who was going to lead Trump’s fight against the deep state bad guys who stole the election, and about a week later was publicly disavowed by Trump?

Keshavarz-Nia sounds like a really smart guy. Wonder how long it’ll be before he’s also thrown under the bus.

* If you ever expect to be taken seriously here, never try to pass off anything from thegatewaypundit. It’s pure shit on the same level as InfoWars/Alex Jones.
 
I'm curious about something. Why is it that Sidney Powell "prove" her case before it even goes in front of a judge while 4 years ago all we needed was an accusation to turn the FBI, NSA, CIA, DIA and DoJ on Trump?
So you are curious why allegations needed an investigation before going before court then, but now evidence is needed before going to court?
 
I'm curious about something. Why is it that Sidney Powell "prove" her case before it even goes in front of a judge while 4 years ago all we needed was an accusation to turn the FBI, NSA, CIA, DIA and DoJ on Trump?
Sydney Powell didn’t “prove” anything in front of a judge either. And Trump and Co. have no one but themselves to blame for the troubles they’ve had (and will continue to have).
 
how many cases have Trump's experts won so far?
Trump's attorneys , Giuliani and Jenna Ellis are involved in 3 cases to date. They started in the District court moving up the system hoping to be heard by the SC. Another case they have piggybacked on that was filed by someone else and it is set to be heard in the SC. One case can be heard in multiple courts but it is still just one case. Powell is involved in two to date that were just filed and will be heard this week before the Federal District courts in GA. and MI. Lin Wood is involved in two cases in GA. There are several cases being brought before the court by other groups. In PA it was Rep. Kelly along with others that brought a case before the federal district court and the judge's opinion is the case had merit but would not rule on it. So it was sent before the PA Supreme Court and they shot it down. But because it involves Constitutional matters they are hoping the SC will hear the case.
 
Trump's attorneys , Giuliani and Jenna Ellis are involved in 3 cases to date. They started in the District court moving up the system hoping to be heard by the SC. Another case they have piggybacked on that was filed by someone else and it is set to be heard in the SC. One case can be heard in multiple courts but it is still just one case. Powell is involved in two to date that were just filed and will be heard this week before the Federal District courts in GA. and MI. Lin Wood is involved in two cases in GA. There are several cases being brought before the court by other groups. In PA it was Rep. Kelly along with others that brought a case before the federal district court and the judge's opinion is the case had merit but would not rule on it. So it was sent before the PA Supreme Court and they shot it down. But because it involves Constitutional matters they are hoping the SC will hear the case.
How many cases have they won?
 
Noted top expert in cyber security
------------------------

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia's name may not mean a lot to you, but it's one of the weightiest names in the world when it comes to sniffing out cyber-security problems.


We know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because, just two and a half months ago, the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a massive, multi-million-dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran against the American intelligence and military communities. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good:

 
Noted top expert in cyber security
------------------------

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia's name may not mean a lot to you, but it's one of the weightiest names in the world when it comes to sniffing out cyber-security problems.


We know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because, just two and a half months ago, the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a massive, multi-million-dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran against the American intelligence and military communities. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good:

Has he inspected the equipment?
 
Noted top expert in cyber security
------------------------

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia's name may not mean a lot to you, but it's one of the weightiest names in the world when it comes to sniffing out cyber-security problems.


We know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because, just two and a half months ago, the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a massive, multi-million-dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran against the American intelligence and military communities. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good:

He is a very reliable witness. But as soon as it was known that Powell had him as one of her key witnesses, the left has been trying to discredit him. He isn't the only one that is a very credible witness in regard to cyber securtiy.

I have been hearing that Patrick M. Byrne is providing his findings on Dominion and Smartmatic. Patrick was the former CEO that launched Overstock.com in 1999. Byrne did not vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020. His political affiliation is Libertarian. For months he claims that he has been involved comprising a team of the brightest hackers that work for major companies/corporations like IBM and others to test electronic systems one being voting machines to see if they could be infiltrated by hackers. He said with 1 being the least secure to 10 being the most secure Dominion came in at 1. It is so easily hacked. They were able to access the machine with their cell phones. Evidently there is something about the software as soon as anyone accesses a machine with a code card that code can end up on the dark web for sale where our enemies could purchase that code to play havoc on our elections.
 
He is a very reliable witness. But as soon as it was known that Powell had him as one of her key witnesses, the left has been trying to discredit him. He isn't the only one that is a very credible witness in regard to cyber securtiy.

I have been hearing that Patrick M. Byrne is providing his findings on Dominion and Smartmatic. Patrick was the former CEO that launched Overstock.com in 1999. Byrne did not vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020. His political affiliation is Libertarian. For months he claims that he has been involved comprising a team of the brightest hackers that work for major companies/corporations like IBM and others to test electronic systems one being voting machines to see if they could be infiltrated by hackers. He said with 1 being the least secure to 10 being the most secure Dominion came in at 1. It is so easily hacked. They were able to access the machine with their cell phones. Evidently there is something about the software as soon as anyone accesses a machine with a code card that code can end up on the dark web for sale where our enemies could purchase that code to play havoc on our elections.

Too bad Repubicans did not try to pursue all those bills Dems had passed for improving election security, eh?
 
How many cases have they won?
The three that Trump's attorney's are involved have not made it through the system yet to claim they have won or lost any of them
 
I'm curious about something. Why is it that Sidney Powell "prove" her case before it even goes in front of a judge while 4 years ago all we needed was an accusation to turn the FBI, NSA, CIA, DIA and DoJ on Trump?

You’re curious about something you invented in your head, so you’re the only one who can answer that
 
The double standard is that the only thing the FBI needed to launch a massive investigation into the Trump campaign was an accusation of coordination with Russia. They didn't require a shred of evidence, much less any proof, before they got the FISC to sign off and DoJ to come up with a "plan B" just in case Russia didn't pan out. Now you want Sidney Powell to prove her case before it even gets in front of a court.

Ok so here we have another right winger who doesn’t understand that evidence gathering and the court case are two different steps.

Your right wing dipshits looked for evidence and didn’t find any. Get over it.
 
Too bad Repubicans did not try to pursue all those bills Dems had passed for improving election security, eh?
Too bad our CIA and several other three letter departments in our government for over a decade have not done something to stop it by exposing it.
 
I'm curious about something. Why is it that Sidney Powell "prove" her case before it even goes in front of a judge while 4 years ago all we needed was an accusation to turn the FBI, NSA, CIA, DIA and DoJ on Trump?
Rudy distancing himself from Powell should be proof enough.
 
Too bad our CIA and several other three letter departments in our government for over a decade have not done something to stop it by exposing it.
Yea that is strange right?
 
He is a very reliable witness. But as soon as it was known that Powell had him as one of her key witnesses, the left has been trying to discredit him. He isn't the only one that is a very credible witness in regard to cyber securtiy.

I have been hearing that Patrick M. Byrne is providing his findings on Dominion and Smartmatic. Patrick was the former CEO that launched Overstock.com in 1999. Byrne did not vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020. His political affiliation is Libertarian. For months he claims that he has been involved comprising a team of the brightest hackers that work for major companies/corporations like IBM and others to test electronic systems one being voting machines to see if they could be infiltrated by hackers. He said with 1 being the least secure to 10 being the most secure Dominion came in at 1. It is so easily hacked. They were able to access the machine with their cell phones. Evidently there is something about the software as soon as anyone accesses a machine with a code card that code can end up on the dark web for sale where our enemies could purchase that code to play havoc on our elections.
Weird that the Democrats didn’t use this knowledge to increase house seats, flip the senate, and dominate state legislatures.

Even weirder that you ‘know’ all this, but it hasn’t actually been presented in a lawsuit before anyone certified the vote.

Seems like a bunch of idiots are in charge, huh?

Or maybe they are just playing Trumpanzees as suckers?
 
Weird that the Democrats didn’t use this knowledge to increase house seats, flip the senate, and dominate state legislatures.

Even weirder that you ‘know’ all this, but it hasn’t actually been presented in a lawsuit before anyone certified the vote.

Seems like a bunch of idiots are in charge, huh?

Or maybe they are just playing Trumpanzees as suckers?
There does appear to be evidence that multiple House races and a couple of Senate races were manipulated according to the data.
 
Back
Top Bottom