- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 85,688
- Reaction score
- 72,378
- Location
- Third Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Yep, which is why I'd take the lump sum anonymously.Could be the differences in the way winnings are taxed and how and when those taxes are levied. You win a multimillion dollar jackpot in the US and most folks are going to take the "give it to me now" option. That immediately reduces what you get to half the prize money. Then the state and federal government wants their piece. That reduces the already reduced prize by half to three quarters. Then the family, exes, friends and con artists show up to the party and that million dollar home you just signed onto now puts you in debt.
The problem with the payments is you will firstly lose value of the future payments to inflation.
Secondly, you lose the future value and opportunity cost over the 20 years of the lump sum. A lump sum invested wisely over 20 years can show quite a profit! Just look at the generic S & P value over 20 years! But of course if you lack discipline, then it would seem the payments will at least keep you alive and partially solvent for two decades. But I wouldn't do it.