• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme Court turns away a 2nd Amendment challenge to blue-state bans on assault weapons

Same old sad comment by grammar-impaired gun apologists.
Grammar is exactly why your continued insistence that inanimate objects can commit an act is so retarded.
 
You’ve been given the data. Firearms are irrelevant to suicide rates.
Firearms are the preferred method of homicide and male suicide in the USA. That is the data.
Your "data" about Japanese suicide does not prove your claim and is irrelevant to the USA.
You refuse to address the thought experiment about how suicide would likely change in Japan if firearms were available.
 
Firearms are the preferred method of homicide and male suicide in the USA. That is the data.
Your "data" about Japanese suicide does not prove your claim and is irrelevant to the USA.
You refuse to address the thought experiment about how suicide would likely change in Japan if firearms were available.

Your thought experiment is navel contemplation.
 
Firearms are the preferred method of homicide and male suicide in the USA. That is the data.
Your "data" about Japanese suicide does not prove your claim and is irrelevant to the USA.
It proves that guts don't cause suicide
You refuse to address the thought experiment about how suicide would likely change in Japan if firearms were available.
He refuses to address the lack of thought experiment. He's missing the qualifier of having his brain scooped out.
 
Your denial demonstrates your lack of understanding of suicide, firearms, the social consequences of access to lethal means, and common sense.
The Black Knight denial award is merited here. I bestow it upon you!


Alright, we'll call it a draw...
 
Firearm suicide is an important issue.
Sadly, 55% of men and about 30% of female suicide victims us firearms.
The fraction of females using firearms is higher in the USA than similar countries presumably due to the access to firearms being greater in the USA.
Firearm suicide is more likely to be fatal, so the access to firearms likely increases the number of completed suicides in the USA.
Firearms must then be considered a risk factor for suicide.
 
Firearm suicide is an important issue.
Firearms can't commit suicide. It's not a serious issue
Sadly, 55% of men and about 30% of female suicide victims us firearms.
Unless you can show the firearm harbors a demon that possesses the user it's not relevant to law.
The fraction of females using firearms is higher in the USA than similar countries presumably due to the access to firearms being greater in the USA.
Yeah noticing people have the right to own firearms isn't an argument against owning firearms. Make a less brainless comment please
Firearm suicide is more likely to be fatal,
Firearms can't commit suicide
so the access to firearms likely increases the number of completed suicides in the USA.
Proven false.
Firearms must then be considered a risk factor for suicide.
Idiotic.
 
Firearms are the preferred method of homicide and male suicide in the USA.
Irrelevant.
That is the data.
Nope. The data is firearms are irrelevant to homicide and suicide RATES.
Your "data" about Japanese suicide does not prove your claim and is irrelevant to the USA.
This is called special pleading.
You refuse to address the thought experiment about how suicide would likely change in Japan if firearms were available.
Because I don’t indulge fantasy. I refute your premise with actual data.
 
Firearm suicide is an important issue.
Sadly, 55% of men and about 30% of female suicide victims us firearms.

Oh. That's the sad part. That some use guns.

Thanks for confirming you couldn't really give a shit about suicide itself.

The fraction of females using firearms is higher in the USA than similar countries presumably due to the access to firearms being greater in the USA.
Firearm suicide is more likely to be fatal, so the access to firearms likely increases the number of completed suicides in the USA.
Firearms must then be considered a risk factor for suicide.
 
Just like Einstein's conception of relativity...

No, just like wild speculation triggered by who knows what. It often sounds like religious fervor.
 
Irrelevant.

Nope. The data is firearms are irrelevant to homicide and suicide RATES.

This is called special pleading.

Because I don’t indulge fantasy. I refute your premise with actual data.
Relentlessly wrong.
 
No, just like wild speculation triggered by who knows what. It often sounds like religious fervor.
Einstein used thought experiments to hypothesize the implications of his theory.
One can easily imagine that the sudden introduction of firearms into Japan would likely add a risk factor that would increase suicide.
Of course, if you think opportunity and means are unrelated to homicide and suicide, you will not be able to understand the likely outcome.
 
Einstein used thought experiments to hypothesize the implications of his theory.
One can easily imagine that the sudden introduction of firearms into Japan would likely add a risk factor that would increase suicide.
Of course, if you think opportunity and means are unrelated to homicide and suicide, you will not be able to understand the likely outcome.

Oh. You imagine. Well why didn't you say so?

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
I accept your surrender.
You disconnect from facts has invalidate all your posts.
The data is clear-- firearms are a risk factor and access promotes accidents, suicide and homicide.
 
You disconnect from facts has invalidate all your posts.
The data is clear-- firearms are a risk factor and access promotes accidents, suicide and homicide.

Except when it doesn't. Like in the cases of more than 100 million people with access to firearms.
 
Except when it doesn't. Like in the cases of more than 100 million people with access to firearms.
A risk factor does not always get expressed in every circumstance.
IOW, not everyone with a car, chainsaw, or rope produces death and injury.
 
You disconnect from facts has invalidate all your posts.
I have been curb stomping your argument with the facts.
The data is clear--
I know. I’m pounding you into the ground with it.
firearms are a risk factor and access promotes accidents, suicide and homicide.
Demonstrably false. As we know empirically, firearms have no relevance to homicide or suicide rates.
 
I have been curb stomping your argument with the facts.

I know. I’m pounding you into the ground with it.

Demonstrably false. As we know empirically, firearms have no relevance to homicide or suicide rates.
Do you think an unlocked loaded handgun in a household poses a risk to children?
 
Back
Top Bottom