• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme Court turns away a 2nd Amendment challenge to blue-state bans on assault weapons

Spock said:
Silly would be to equate firearms with a rope, swimming pool, or car.... which seems to be your inclination.
Click to expand...

They are entirely equitable in some aspects. Namely the ones that are the basis of your selective condemnation.
 
RF667799 said:
They are entirely equitable in some aspects. Namely the ones that are the basis of your selective condemnation.
Click to expand...
Anyone with half a brain can understand that firearms are not ropes or swimming pools.
 
Spock said:
Anyone with half a brain can understand that firearms are not ropes or swimming pools.
Click to expand...

Post rejected on the basis it is pure ad hominem fallacy.
 
Spock said:
Silly would be to equate firearms with a rope, swimming pool, or car.... which seems to be your inclination.
Click to expand...
I guess it would be pointless to point out for like the 9 millionth time that he's equating death to death. You have to misrepresent this every single time because you cannot argue against it so you pull this desk on his crap cuz your position is bs
 
CLAX1911 said:
I guess it would be pointless to point out for like the 9 millionth time that he's equating death to death. You have to misrepresent this every single time because you cannot argue against it so you pull this desk on his crap cuz your position is bs
Click to expand...

I could make the true statement that a stop sign and my truck are both red, and @Spock would start his false equivalence chanting. It's all he has.
 
RF667799 said:
I could make the true statement that a stop sign and my truck are both red, and @Spock would start his false equivalence chanting. It's all he has.
Click to expand...
It's his most pathetic cop out and he refuses to acknowledge it this is because he's wrong and he knows he's wrong. Congrats I would tell you since you still interacts with you Hammer him on this.
 
RF667799 said:
I could make the true statement that a stop sign and my truck are both red, and @Spock would start his false equivalence chanting. It's all he has.
Click to expand...
By your reasoning, you will stop every time you see a red truck.
 
Spock said:
By your reasoning, you will stop every time you see a red truck.
Click to expand...

In an intersection I'm about to enter? Yes. No matter the color.

Saying two things share a characteristic is not saying the two things are the same in other ways. This subtlety may be lost on you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom