- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
- Messages
- 56,300
- Reaction score
- 28,187
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Same old sad comment by grammar-impaired gun apologists.
Pinch your finger in the slide of a 1911.
Firearm violence.
Same old sad comment by grammar-impaired gun apologists.
Grammar is exactly why your continued insistence that inanimate objects can commit an act is so retarded.Same old sad comment by grammar-impaired gun apologists.
Firearms are the preferred method of homicide and male suicide in the USA. That is the data.You’ve been given the data. Firearms are irrelevant to suicide rates.
Firearms are the preferred method of homicide and male suicide in the USA. That is the data.
Your "data" about Japanese suicide does not prove your claim and is irrelevant to the USA.
You refuse to address the thought experiment about how suicide would likely change in Japan if firearms were available.
No such thing as fire arm violence.Firearm violence involves all three, of course.
It proves that guts don't cause suicideFirearms are the preferred method of homicide and male suicide in the USA. That is the data.
Your "data" about Japanese suicide does not prove your claim and is irrelevant to the USA.
He refuses to address the lack of thought experiment. He's missing the qualifier of having his brain scooped out.You refuse to address the thought experiment about how suicide would likely change in Japan if firearms were available.
Your denial demonstrates your lack of understanding of suicide, firearms, the social consequences of access to lethal means, and common sense.
The Black Knight denial award is merited here. I bestow it upon you!
Just like Einstein's conception of relativity...Your thought experiment is navel contemplation.
No more like flat earthers trying to explain a lunar eclipse.Just like Einstein's conception of relativity...
Firearms can't commit suicide. It's not a serious issueFirearm suicide is an important issue.
Unless you can show the firearm harbors a demon that possesses the user it's not relevant to law.Sadly, 55% of men and about 30% of female suicide victims us firearms.
Yeah noticing people have the right to own firearms isn't an argument against owning firearms. Make a less brainless comment pleaseThe fraction of females using firearms is higher in the USA than similar countries presumably due to the access to firearms being greater in the USA.
Firearms can't commit suicideFirearm suicide is more likely to be fatal,
Proven false.so the access to firearms likely increases the number of completed suicides in the USA.
Idiotic.Firearms must then be considered a risk factor for suicide.
Irrelevant.Firearms are the preferred method of homicide and male suicide in the USA.
Nope. The data is firearms are irrelevant to homicide and suicide RATES.That is the data.
This is called special pleading.Your "data" about Japanese suicide does not prove your claim and is irrelevant to the USA.
Because I don’t indulge fantasy. I refute your premise with actual data.You refuse to address the thought experiment about how suicide would likely change in Japan if firearms were available.
Firearm suicide is an important issue.
Sadly, 55% of men and about 30% of female suicide victims us firearms.
The fraction of females using firearms is higher in the USA than similar countries presumably due to the access to firearms being greater in the USA.
Firearm suicide is more likely to be fatal, so the access to firearms likely increases the number of completed suicides in the USA.
Firearms must then be considered a risk factor for suicide.
Just like Einstein's conception of relativity...
Relentlessly wrong.Irrelevant.
Nope. The data is firearms are irrelevant to homicide and suicide RATES.
This is called special pleading.
Because I don’t indulge fantasy. I refute your premise with actual data.
Einstein used thought experiments to hypothesize the implications of his theory.No, just like wild speculation triggered by who knows what. It often sounds like religious fervor.
Einstein used thought experiments to hypothesize the implications of his theory.
One can easily imagine that the sudden introduction of firearms into Japan would likely add a risk factor that would increase suicide.
Of course, if you think opportunity and means are unrelated to homicide and suicide, you will not be able to understand the likely outcome.
Cripplingly ironic.Relentlessly wrong.
I accept your surrender.Relentlessly wrong.
You disconnect from facts has invalidate all your posts.I accept your surrender.
You disconnect from facts has invalidate all your posts.
The data is clear-- firearms are a risk factor and access promotes accidents, suicide and homicide.
A risk factor does not always get expressed in every circumstance.Except when it doesn't. Like in the cases of more than 100 million people with access to firearms.
No more like flat earthers trying to explain a lunar eclipse.
I have been curb stomping your argument with the facts.You disconnect from facts has invalidate all your posts.
I know. I’m pounding you into the ground with it.The data is clear--
Demonstrably false. As we know empirically, firearms have no relevance to homicide or suicide rates.firearms are a risk factor and access promotes accidents, suicide and homicide.
Do you think an unlocked loaded handgun in a household poses a risk to children?I have been curb stomping your argument with the facts.
I know. I’m pounding you into the ground with it.
Demonstrably false. As we know empirically, firearms have no relevance to homicide or suicide rates.