In New York they're slamming young mothers on the ground and handcuffing them in front of 4 year old kids just because they're not wearing a mask.
In New York they're slamming young mothers on the ground and handcuffing them in front of 4 year old kids just because they're not wearing a mask.Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to "liberal" government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to "liberal" government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Does the term "stand your ground" always imply use of a weapon? Would just shoving someone away, maybe putting them on the ground, still get you the benefit of the "stand your ground" principle?
I don't know enough about it maybe. In the McMichael/Arbery threads I thought Arbery was standing his ground when he went after the shotgun instead of complying.
that's Fisher Price My First Insurrection.
There have been several cases of people deliberately coughing on produce and other people. They have been charged with making terroristic threats for the act. So it seems reasonable to me that a person can shoot another person for trying to infect them with a deadly pathogen and legitimately claim self defense.
Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to "liberal" government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
I wouldn't mind if they shot this asshole.
[video]https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=guy+wipes+nose+on+worker&docid=608022297765546503&mid=235684DB2C957DE589DC235684DB2C957DE589DC&view=detail&FORM=VIRE[/video]
Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to "liberal" government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Can I just tase em bro?
View attachment 67280908
asymptomatic people can spread the virus. these people should have been arrested.
Oh. Yeah, I don't think standing too close is a reason to spray someone with a noxious chemical. Ianal though.
Could have been. But going through a security checkpoint to stand in a designated area corralled by police is hardly an insurrection. Worst. Insurrection. Ever.
Actually, the woman that did that wasn't positive for the virus. The grocery store had to throw out $35,000 worth of produce which she is currently trying to pay for.
Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to "liberal" government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
Since you are wearing a mask, you are safe, right? So why do you care?
Snort!Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to "liberal" government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
So you should wear that and not worry about the other guys.Incorrect; if you are wearing a cloth or paper mask you are not protected - you are only protecting the other guy. Only NIOSH certified masks like the N95s can protect you from someone else.
So you should wear that and not worry about the other guys.
Ive said as much on this site which is why all the mask hysteria is so foolish.just letting you know - if you want protection from others, cloth or surgical masks ain't gonna cut it.
Incorrect; if you are wearing a cloth or paper mask you are not protected - you are only protecting the other guy. Only NIOSH certified masks like the N95s can protect you from someone else.
COVID-19: How much protection do face masks offer? - Mayo Clinic
Since the virus is potentially fatal to some persons and there is no magic wand that predicts who, it has the potential to be considered assault with a deadly weapon, as future court cases may or may not decide. We may very well see a court case where a person was witnessed directly confronting an at risk person and infecting them, and that victim later became deathly ill, and sued the aggressor, and maybe they might win the case.
View attachment 67280908
asymptomatic people can spread the virus. these people should have been arrested.
In New York they're slamming young mothers on the ground and handcuffing them in front of 4 year old kids just because they're not wearing a mask.
Since you could face serious harm or death by a person without a mask who may have and transmit the coronavirus, should you be able to use deadly force in self-defense if that person approaches you and refuses to back off?
Admittedly, people who adhere to "liberal" government mask guidelines are less likely to be among the “right to carry” crowd, but that may change.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?