• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

So, if Trump did have boxes and boxes of classified documents...

Who here honestly believes he wouldn't sell them to *anyone* for the right price?


  • Total voters
    41
I honestly couldn’t get past the title. Where is the procedure written in the Constitution or legal code?




Hint: I am playing advocate for the devil, here.

Well, I think you should get past the title. Then you should click on the authors, and finally read the snippet I posted here. If I thought the article should be taken with a grain of salt I would have said so.
 
Well, I think you should get past the title. Then you should click on the authors, and finally read the snippet I posted here. If I thought the article should be taken with a grain of salt then I would have said so.
See my edit.
 
If you click on the names of the authors then I think you'll agree that they're qualified to speak on this. I didn't cite my mom's petsitter.
I saw that, again, the notifications process is s should not a shall, and they are basing everything on an EO from a previous President. EOs don't govern Presidents.
 
Even if Trump "declassified" them with his magic wand, they are still potentially Presidential records. And Presidential records are property of the US government. And it's not legal for Trump to have them at his private residence.
That's true, but what is also true is that Obama took a bunch with him as well that haven't been returned.
 
I saw that, again, the notifications process is s should not a shall, and they are basing everything on an EO from a previous President. EOs don't govern Presidents.

Okay, but that still leaves you with the original problem: if he declassified them but they didn't go through the declassification process, then you only have his word to go by.

And then you're left with the central problem: Would he lie about declassifying them?
 
See my edit.
Yes I read that part, but that's a problem to be determined in the courts, I suspect. But until we have that discussion, we have the declassification process as explained.
 
That he can declassify anything isn't a point in dispute. What is in dispute is that he did, in fact, declassify the documents. If they didn't go through the declassification process, then all you have is his word that they were declassified.
Which is all that is needed. To be honest, if classified documents are what they were after, they'll have a hell of a time trying to prove he didn't declassify them while President.
 
Yes I read that part, but that's a problem to be determined in the courts, I suspect. But until we have that discussion, we have the declassification process as explained.
Can you find where the scenario is covered in written rules for the operation of the US government. I hope there would be something that prevents this, but hoping and wishing don’t get ‘er done.
 
Okay, but that still leaves you with the original problem: if he declassified them but they didn't go through the declassification process, then you only have his word to go by.

And then you're left with the central problem: Would he lie about declassifying them?
The declassification process is for the benefit of everyone UNDER the President, not the President himself. As far as his word on the issue, thats all that's really going to be applicable, and he'd be an idiot to tell them he didn't.
 
Which is all that is needed. To be honest, if classified documents are what they were after, they'll have a hell of a time trying to prove he didn't declassify them while President.
Sorry, but you can't shift the burden of evidence to proving the negative.
 
Can you find where the scenario is covered in written rules for the operation of the US government. I hope there would be something that prevents this, but hoping and wishing don’t get ‘er done.
No I can't. I can only provide you the process that exists for the purpose declassifying documents, as explained by people who are eminently qualified to speak on the subject.
 
That's true, but what is also true is that Obama took a bunch with him as well that haven't been returned.
Do you have a link that verifies that President Obama currently has Presidential documents at his personal residence that should be in the National Archives?

I did a quick search and didn't find anything.
 
That's true, but what is also true is that Obama took a bunch with him as well that haven't been returned.
What is this claim based on?
 
You ask, I serve.
Thanks!

"Strictly speaking, even if Trump ordered the declassification of the records (verbally or in writing), what is likely to matter for purposes of handling and storing the records after he left the White House was if the mandatory follow-on actions occurred. Classified documents have classification markings in the header and footer of each page, indicating the level of classification for the document as a whole. Furthermore, classified records have cover sheets that specifically indicate when the record was classified, by whom, and under what authority, as well as when the classification expires.

If Trump did in fact order the declassification, he still needed to make sure his staff took the necessary next steps to modify the classification markings on the documents before he could actually handle and store the records (as a private citizen) as if they were unclassified. Under security classification rules, a classification marking on a document has to be treated as valid and binding unless and until a subsequent marking replaces it. Appropriate government staffers would have needed to cross out the classification markings in the headers and footers, and stamped “declassified” on the record noting when it was declassified, by whom and under what authority. Since that does not appear to have been done with the classified documents reportedly identified to date, the documents remain classified and had to be treated as classified for handling and storage purposes."
I could be mistaken, but Trump doesn't strike me as a "by the book" kinda guy.
He would be more likely to simply blurt out "I hereby declassify everything in these boxes" as he loaded up the U-Haul.
 
I'm not incorrect. I've been working in the classified arena for over 30 years. The President can declassify anything he wants for any reason he wants. The notifications after are for administrative purposes only.

I work in that arena right now, from time to time and everything has to be logged.
 
Thanks!

I could be mistaken, but Trump doesn't strike me as a "by the book" kinda guy.
He would be more likely to simply blurt out "I hereby declassify everything in these boxes" as he loaded up the U-Haul.
Yeah, unfortunately for him that may not be good enough.
 
. As far as his word on the issue, thats all that's really going to be applicable, and he'd be an idiot to tell them he didn't.

Of course if that is the meat of the issue Trump will simply claim he declassified them while in office. Whether he actually did is another question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mac
That's true, but what is also true is that Obama took a bunch with him as well that haven't been returned.
So get a warrant.
 
No I can't. I can only provide you the process that exists for the purpose declassifying documents, as explained by people who are eminently qualified to speak on the subject.
What do they call that maneuver? Lateral shift?….;)
 
We went from “you ask, I serve……” to “no, I can’t……”
 
We went from “you ask, I serve……” to “no, I can’t……”
You said: "I can find no set procedure for a POTUS declassification of documents..."

My source addressed that specifically. I don't think I'm all that and a bag of chips, but I did expect a simple "thanks" or even just for you to hit the "like" button. What I didn't expect was for you to be hostile to the article before you knew anything about it or who wrote it.
 
You said: "I can find no set procedure for a POTUS declassification of documents..."

My source addressed that specifically. I don't think I'm all that and a bag of chips, but I did expect a simple "thanks" or even just for you to hit the "like" button. What I didn't expect was for you to be hostile to the article before you knew anything about it or who wrote it.
You “served” up an opinion. Where do you get the hostility? Things have been a little tense, lately. Maybe start with my first post (#15) and work from there. If it’s not written in law or the Constitution, it’s an opinion, opinions don’t bolster any position.


Oh, sorry if I hurt your feeling, Thank-you!
 
Back
Top Bottom