With more and more push to for women to do combat roles in the military should women have to sign up for selective services. For those that don't know Selective Services what male Americans have to sign up for when they turn 18 so they can be drafted if a draft is ever called up again. If you fail to sign up you can face jail time, be fined, and is denied aid for college.
What if both father and mother are drafted?
With more and more push to for women to do combat roles in the military should women have to sign up for selective services. For those that don't know Selective Services what male Americans have to sign up for when they turn 18 so they can be drafted if a draft is ever called up again. If you fail to sign up you can face jail time, be fined, and is denied aid for college.
I think our society is deeply in error where it tries to treat men and woman as interchangeable, and to deny the essential, fundamental differences between them.
The idea of women being subject to the same obligation as men with regard to military service, and the idea of women serving in combat, is surely one of the most blatant areas in which this error can be seen.
It is the natural role and duty of men to protect women, and to fight violently, where necessary, to do so. This is programmed into us by instinct. Similarly, wherever else the use of violence is called for, this falls under the natural role and duty of men, and not of women. To hold that women should bear the same obligation as men in this regard, is to deny the basic natural differences between men and women.
In a practical sense, if you put men and women in a situation where they are fighting side by side against a common enemy, it is going to be the natural instinct of every real man who is of any value as a man, to protect the women around him at the expense of the cause for which he is supposed to be fighting. Aside form the obvious reduction in effectiveness as a military force, one has to consider the implications of training men and women for this situation, to override their natural instincts, when they are later returned to civilian society. What can be the impact, in a civilian society, of men who have been trained to override their natural instinct to protect women? What of women who have been trained to engage in violence outside of their inherent nature? Neither of these is going to be good for the society into which these former soldiers are returned.
I would very much prefer that women not be in the military at all, and where they are in the military, that they be kept as far as possible from actual combat.
My OP was just about this subject manner in the board sense not the small details if such a thing happen. Pretty sure that would be rules in place to make something like that didn't happen.
Perhaps we need to add a Department of Crybaby Men to deal with all the new regs and enforcement. Big gov to the rescue, huh?
This is programmed into us by instinct.
What?
With more and more push to for women to do combat roles in the military should women have to sign up for selective services. For those that don't know Selective Services what male Americans have to sign up for when they turn 18 so they can be drafted if a draft is ever called up again. If you fail to sign up you can face jail time, be fined, and is denied aid for college.
With all the new regulations, procedures and enforcement required to implement your new rules and requirements, we'll need another Department just to take care this.
But that's ok, it's worth it, right? We'll spend millions and create a new government department just so that crybaby men will feel better because women need to sign up for something that's never gonna happen anyway.
No, because no one of any sex should be required to.
Why does a new Dept. need to be made. I think Selective Services could handle just fine.
I'm illustrating a point.
You are asking that a useless government service be expanded. Have you thought about this?
Just get rid of it all together.
I personally don't think Selective or the Draft is useless. I think personally see it as a civil duty for being a citizen. If man and women are equal they should be both drafted.
I think our society is deeply in error where it tries to treat men and woman as interchangeable, and to deny the essential, fundamental differences between them.
The idea of women being subject to the same obligation as men with regard to military service, and the idea of women serving in combat, is surely one of the most blatant areas in which this error can be seen.
It is the natural role and duty of men to protect women, and to fight violently, where necessary, to do so.
This is programmed into us by instinct.
Similarly, wherever else the use of violence is called for, this falls under the natural role and duty of men, and not of women. To hold that women should bear the same obligation as men in this regard, is to deny the basic natural differences between men and women.
In a practical sense, if you put men and women in a situation where they are fighting side by side against a common enemy, it is going to be the natural instinct of every real man who is of any value as a man, to protect the women around him at the expense of the cause for which he is supposed to be fighting.
Aside form the obvious reduction in effectiveness as a military force, one has to consider the implications of training men and women for this situation, to override their natural instincts, when they are later returned to civilian society.
What can be the impact, in a civilian society, of men who have been trained to override their natural instinct to protect women?
What of women who have been trained to engage in violence outside of their inherent nature?
Neither of these is going to be good for the society into which these former soldiers are returned.
What if both father and mother are drafted?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?