• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should There Be Another Debate With Kamala and Trump?

Should There Be Another Debate With Kamala and Trump?


  • Total voters
    71
  • Poll closed .

SkyChief

USN Veteran
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 3, 2019
Messages
8,921
Reaction score
5,954
Location
SoCal
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Should There Be Another Debate With Kamala and Trump?

There is buzz on the street that Kamala wants another debate with Trump. In your opinion, is another debate really necessary?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain which issues should be covered that were not covered in the first debate. Or which issues in the first debate need to be re-hashed.
 
Absolutely.
 
Should There Be Another Debate With Kamala and Trump?

There is buzz on the street that Kamala wants another debate with Trump. In your opinion, is another debate really necessary?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain which issues should be covered that were not covered in the first debate. Or which issues in the first debate need to be re-hashed.
I think anyone who is undecided at this point has a screw loose and will probably end up voting for Trump no matter what happens in a second debate. I don’t think that Trump has the physical or mental fortitude to handle another.
 
Last edited:
There is buzz on the street that Kamala wants another debate with Trump.

Trump would easily prevail in a debate with Harris, and I expect he'll accept her challenge.
Link
Harris has a lot of explaining to do, and Trump will certainly exploit her many weaknesses on the debate stage.
 
The debates are a shit show. She should do some town hall type events though imo.
 
Trump would easily prevail in a debate with Harris, and I expect he'll accept her challenge.
Link
Harris has a lot of explaining to do, and Trump will certainly exploit her many weaknesses on the debate stage.

Psst - He "would easily prevail in a debate with Harris" is what Trump supporters said...

...... ...... Yet he failed miserably,

...... ...... ...... ...... And got his ass kicked across the state.

WW
 
Should there be? Yes.
After Trumps disaster would he agree to one without unreasonable conditions? I doubt it.
 
Trump would easily prevail in a debate with Harris, and I expect he'll accept her challenge.
Link
Harris has a lot of explaining to do, and Trump will certainly exploit her many weaknesses on the debate stage.
Is this a re-post from a month ago when Trump nuts were trying to tell us he would mop the floor with Harris? It turned out the opposite was true, eh?

Trump was completely taken apart by her. There is no rational reason to believe that Trump could flip the script next time. That said, Harris' performance was so dominant, it is also hard to believe she could top it.
 
Should There Be Another Debate With Kamala and Trump?

There is buzz on the street that Kamala wants another debate with Trump. In your opinion, is another debate really necessary?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain which issues should be covered that were not covered in the first debate. Or which issues in the first debate need to be re-hashed.
I don't think any debates are necessary, but the people sure do like their shows...so sure. Have another debate.

But this time, have someone from a right wing news site be the moderators. That way, it can be three against Harris. You know, turn about is fair play and all that.
 
I think a debate on neutral grounds with moderators who aren't working to get one of them collected is almost necessary after that shit show.
 
I think it would be good for Harris to have another debate at which she talks a little more concretely about her economic plans, since that is at least what the undecideds claim they want from her.

I think she has already been 20x more detailed than Trump, whose entire platform is just declarative statements like we will end all war and lower grocery costs, but the conservative propaganda machine has apparently convinced many that she needs more specifics whereas he should get a free pass.
 
Should There Be Another Debate With Kamala and Trump?

There is buzz on the street that Kamala wants another debate with Trump. In your opinion, is another debate really necessary?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain which issues should be covered that were not covered in the first debate. Or which issues in the first debate need to be re-hashed.
The malignant narcissist scumbag piece of shit liar grifter rapist seditionist felon and tax cheat said no. Too chicken shit.
 
How long is Kamala Harris going to tell lies about Trump before the left media call her out for the obvious lies, exaggerations and misinformation.
Project 2025 is not a Trump product. Now if you are OK with lying then Kamala is your pick. Trump didn't say white nationalist are very fine people. Trump has no plan to do away with Social Security or Medicare or ACA.
She's lying, offering a dream list of free money without any plan for how to inact those gifts or how to pay for it. Somebody on the left needs to ask how this is affordable and how she'll get these things through the Congress.
She's memorized speeches but she will not do interviews with journalist that will ask her the hard questions.
 
I am open to it. The last one was a lot of fun to watch.
 
Should There Be Another Debate With Kamala and Trump?

Unnecessary. Kamala obtained everything she needed the other night.

Debating Trump again would be considered pilling-on.
 
Earlier today, Trump said that his two obligatory debates (June 27th, Sept. 10th) are over, and he sees no reason for any additional debates.
 
How long is Kamala Harris going to tell lies about Trump before the left media call her out for the obvious lies, exaggerations and misinformation.
Project 2025 is not a Trump product. Now if you are OK with lying then Kamala is your pick. Trump didn't say white nationalist are very fine people. Trump has no plan to do away with Social Security or Medicare or ACA.
She's lying, offering a dream list of free money without any plan for how to inact those gifts or how to pay for it. Somebody on the left needs to ask how this is affordable and how she'll get these things through the Congress.
She's memorized speeches but she will not do interviews with journalist that will ask her the hard questions.
I hear he has concepts of a new medical plan. Also that he won the debate with 70, 80, 90% approval. All praise the orange Jesus!
 
No.

Trump doesn’t debate. Trump postures and lies and insults. In between the lies and insults Trump displays his progressive dementia by word vomiting nonsensical thoughts in mind numbing repetition.

That Trumpian rally speech crap gets old. Even MAGAs are walking out of his rallies. Who the hell wants to view more mindless rantings from a lunatic? Trump is on TV waaaaaay too much as it is. There’a no there there.

No more debate involving Donald Trump. However, by this time next year he will have regressed to the point that he argues with himself. That might be worth watching: Trump Debates Himself.
 
No. Debates suck and are not really debates. And I don’t want a national outlet again for Trump’s inane hyperbolic bullshit to pollute the ears of all decent Americans.
 
Back
Top Bottom