• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Donald Trump go to prison for what he did on the 6th of January 2021?

Should Donald Trump go to prison for what he did on the 6th of January 2021?

  • yes, he should

    Votes: 79 57.7%

  • no, he should not

    Votes: 34 24.8%

  • I don't know

    Votes: 9 6.6%

  • other

    Votes: 15 10.9%
  • Total voters
    137
Rawley said:
ANd you worship a demented lying moron. Go figure.
Click to expand...
C'mon, give them a little more credit than that. Nobody, not even the dumbest of all the
swamp dwellers could be so dense that they actually worship such a frail, feeble & flawed
individual as Biden. Biden was the medias fictional character who hid his dementia in
his basement for a year, spouting that Trump had wrecked everything and he would bring
about decency, prosperity, & had a secret plan to end the pandemic. Without even campaigning
he was able to combine Bernie's constituency as Biden had none, along with the fear & hatred of Trump
formented by the mainstream media to pull an inside straight & win the 2020 election.
Bernie was the unelectable socialist candidate and among the backbenchers the elites on the
far left chose Biden.

There were some Democrats backbenchers left who had ridiculous matters to raise and whose
constituents expected them to raise them. If all those offered the prospect of office in the near
future were to receive it, there would be no backbenchers left.
 
Last edited:
Jay Falcon said:
Sure, that's what you want to believe. If, like you, I had voted TWICE for Trump the Traitor, I'd want to believe some wild and crazy fantasy, too. Anything to avoid the truth.

Actually, no. I would recognize my mistakes and try to make ammends. I guess that's impossible for hardcore brainwashed Trumpers. No ethics or decency to be found in that group.
Click to expand...
Joe was billed as the antithesis to the tweeting Bad Trump. Yet he clearly wasn’t. Even Joe’s tweets (“We are with you, Jussie”) were often more ridiculous. Biden's handlers have managed to restore the Trump record of achievement simply by doing the opposite of what Trump did, thereby ensuring their own failure and reminding voters of what once was working.

Do you think in the future you might be able to author a serious reply?
 
slick said:
C'mon, give them a little more credit than that. Nobody, not even the dumbest of all the
swamp dwellers could be so dense that they actually worship such a frail, feeble & flawed
individual as Biden. Biden was the medias fictional character who hid his dementia in
his basement for a year, spouting that Trump had wrecked everything and he would bring
about decency, prosperity, & had a secret plan to end the pandemic. Without even campaigning
he was able to combine Bernie's constituency as Biden had none, along with the fear & hatred of Trump
formented by the mainstream media to pull an inside straight & win the 2020 election.
Bernie was the unelectable socialist candidate and among the backbenchers the elites on the
far left chose Biden.

There were some Democrats backbenchers left who had ridiculous matters to raise and whose
constituents expected them to raise them. If all those offered the prospect of office in the near
future were to receive it, there would be no backbenchers left.
Click to expand...
And Trump won the election. Do not forget that. It was rigged; otherwise, a shitty, fictional and worthless Biden campaign which spent its time communicating from a hidden Soros basement fairly beat Trump.

Get back on script, please, and have a MAGA.

MAGA.
 
Last edited:
slick said:
Joe was billed as the antithesis to the tweeting Bad Trump. Yet he clearly wasn’t. Even Joe’s tweets (“We are with you, Jussie”) were often more ridiculous. Biden's handlers have managed to restore the Trump record of achievement simply by doing the opposite of what Trump did, thereby ensuring their own failure and reminding voters of what once was working.

Do you think in the future you might be able to author a serious reply?
Click to expand...
It seems you are equating Biden tweets with Trump tweets.

Please don't do that. There is no comparison. Trump was the best tweeter ever.

MAGA.
 
slick said:
Joe was billed as the antithesis to the tweeting Bad Trump. Yet he clearly wasn’t. Even Joe’s tweets (“We are with you, Jussie”) were often more ridiculous. Biden's handlers have managed to restore the Trump record of achievement simply by doing the opposite of what Trump did, thereby ensuring their own failure and reminding voters of what once was working.

Do you think in the future you might be able to author a serious reply?
Click to expand...
Anytime I read "Biden's handlers" I know I'm dealing with someone lacking in facts.
 
neil said:
Given that Trump did commit a crime (since that seems to be what you & many others are insinuating), and the Jan 6 Capitol rioters are getting the premium gitmo treatment when it should only be a $1000 fine, what makes you so sure Trump won't be subjected to the premium gitmo treatment himself?
Click to expand...

He's rich and an Ex-President. The typical 1-6 rioter is not.

Even if Trump shoots someone on 5th Ave, he still wouldn't go to a "real" jail or lose your support.
 
neil said:
Given that Trump did commit a crime (since that seems to be what you & many others are insinuating), and the Jan 6 Capitol rioters are getting the premium gitmo treatment when it should only be a $1000 fine, what makes you so sure Trump won't be subjected to the premium gitmo treatment himself?
Click to expand...
:ROFLMAO:. Thats hilarious shit right there.
 
smallvoice said:
So just who has the authority to do just that?



Since it stumped you, I give you the answer: only the voters have that authority, so have at it.
He's not going to run, but you "Independent" liberals are diddling yourselves over the mere threat that he will.
Click to expand...
yeah ok......you're right .....I don't like Trump and some people do.....I don't like him because I don't like braggarts....I don't like liars.....I don't like narcissists.....I don't like draft dodgers.....I don't like conmen (which a conman is only a conman because he can find fools to fall for his game)....I don't like whorhoppers.....I don't like rapists and exploiter of young girls.....etc etc.....

I don't like Trump mostly for what he and his propaganda machine has done to our nation......brought white supremacy to the power.....
 
Grizzly Adams said:
Define "direct knowledge," and cite the statute criminalizing simple knowledge.
Click to expand...

You know as well as I do what direct knowledge means. I don't waste my time playing stupid games with people trying to play "gotcha."

As far as the second half of your question, the statute is 18 USC, Section 4. It's called "misprision of a felony."

​

 
Superfly said:
You know as well as I do what direct knowledge means. I don't waste my time playing stupid games with people trying to play "gotcha."
Click to expand...
What is the difference between "direct" and "indirect" knowledge, in this case? If you don't want to "play stupid games" then maybe you should be more precise in your language to begin with.

As far as the second half of your question, the statute is 18 USC, Section 4. It's called "misprision of a felony."
Click to expand...
More than simple knowledge is required by the statute, FYI. That's the "conceal" part. Not reporting something isn't the same as concealing it.
 
AVvXsEigqVatBJXpI6_gagvt1ch2YB3jEsVdmfAnACPAO5YIlRTjc05aQHeGxy9x9DDSQgzMIrpu9j2Dk6Mqj1NCGCIvV1GikInWoVcQetO4yXLjRTcLQ4Dy5k_2oZCHPUhlZy0tvMd4Om7IA2EYtvpHbKxr7ZvgD-J2xKRVLta3fkwUcSUOSvZrmg
 
Grizzly Adams said:
What is the difference between "direct" and "indirect" knowledge, in this case? If you don't want to "play stupid games" then maybe you should be more precise in your language to begin with.
Click to expand...

Why should I have to dumb down what I say? If you don't know what I mean when I say "direct knowledge," then maybe the big boy message boards aren't for you.


Grizzly Adams said:
More than simple knowledge is required by the statute, FYI. That's the "conceal" part. Not reporting something isn't the same as concealing it.
Click to expand...

I will speak slowly for you, so you can understand. If ... you ... know ... of ... a ... crime ... being ... committed ... or ... going ... to ... be ... committed ... , you ... can ... be ... held ... liable.

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

I think you are struggling with the whole "conceal" part of the statute. If you know of something and fail to report it, that's concealing.

concealment​

n. fraudulent failure to reveal information which someone knows and is aware that in good faith he/she should communicate to another.
 
neil said:
People don't just get sent to prison to rot behind bars for no reason & no one should ever be subjected to such a thing, other than being convicted of a heinous crime. How is "the Don" being treated special?
Click to expand...
Because he committed a heinous crime, you know, like trying to overthrow our government.
 
gdgyva said:
Great now you have a crime.....now why hasnt the DOJ charged Trump with said crime?
hmmmmmm
I wonder......
Could it be they know they would be laughed out of court due to lack or insufficient evidence?
Speaking of which....what is it that you are going to have the prosecution team use? His speech? The rally?
If this wasnt so sad on your part, it would be funny.....but you truly believe there is a case
In our country we are innocent until PROVEN guilty....EVIDENCE matters
Click to expand...
DOJ doesn't hurry for you.
 
switt said:
Because he committed a heinous crime, you know, like trying to overthrow our government.
Click to expand...
Ok, so he like tried to overthrow our government - I gotcha. In order for anyone (except those afflicted with persistent TDS) to believe our claim that he was like trying to overthrow our government, we're gonna need to provide some like proof of this. Can you fill me in on what it is so I can back up this claim that he tried to like overthrow our government? That would be like helpful.
 
neil said:
Where is your evidence that Trump did and does support the violence of Jan 6?
Click to expand...

Stupid Trumpism. What kind of an idiot does not know what people are talking about? Could anyone really be that ignorant? No. It's Trump sucking. Naked Trump sucking.
 
From the beginning of this January 6th thing it struck me as most likely a staged event. I never had anything to support this outside of how suspicious it was but now I do.

This article is rather lengthy it goes into one of the characters who was pretty much the orchestrator of the January 6th events and FBI news media are pretending like he doesn't exist.

www.revolver.news

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News

Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach.
www.revolver.news www.revolver.news
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom