But you have pointed out nothing. Demonstrate where anyone has said that it is OK to go after Palin's kids and NOT Obama's. Quote-post ANY member here that has said. that. Without doing this, you are distorting and making stuff up.
HAHAHA! I have obviously hit a wall with you, because no matter what I say you can only retort with petty unintelligent arguments. I'm sorry, I had no idea that you needed to be told directly that it is OK to attack Palin. I mean forget the attacks that the left participates in over Palin (Is that not subliminally saying that it is okay to do it?). You and I both know that you are purposefully playing naive (geeze, I hope so...), because you are now scrounging for an argument that isn't there. Not only did you change the frame of the original question, to avoid actually facing up with the facts, you again exhibit your pure ignorance by ONCE AGAIN, making another generalized assumption with no facts!
I have. Conservative hatred easily outnumbers liberal crap. Easily. But, I would imagine that your hackish blinders prevent you from seeing this.
It's unfortunate that you cannot keep an open-mind, I mean where is all of this petty conservative crap you speak of? As you said, please use facts and not opinions! HAHA
This does not prove your point. All it proves is that SOME liberals on this site bash Palin. You need to prove "Liberalism survives solely on hatred because it is the only way they can sustain their agenda". Your statement makes no mention of Palin. It talks about liberalism, the entire concept. So, you have a lot to do to prove this. Get working.
WOW....REALLY? HAHA! I know this was hard for you, but thanks for conceding my point. I mean saying "some" liberals bash her is better then denying it outright. It's good to see that you are somewhat grounded in reality, but you still will not except that it is clearly MOST (oh yes it is! hahaha) Liberals who participate in the Palin bashing. I will not sit here and keep feeding you facts that you are ultimately going to resort to the default defense of diverting away from the facts.
Your self-pwnage? Yup, sure did.
Cute! YES I did, and why??? well judging by the way you have replied so far to my responses, is proof enough! HAHA
So, you became a conservative because you are a crummy debator? Let me tell you, as a conservative, you are STILL a pretty poor debator. Conservatives claim personal responsibility. Perhaps you should follow that and hone up on your debating skills rather than switching positions. It doesn't really matter what your political affiliation is, if you can't defend it... which you can't, or you create logical fallacies in everything you post... which you do. the responsibility is for you to learn how to debate.
Ouch....come on! Totally uncalled for! Well after I cried and cried after what you said about me being a crummy debater, I wen't to my mommy to have her rebuild my self-esteem (since Moms are known for doing that). She kept saying to me "your not the worst debater (she tried to hold in a laugh)". So here I am, with the best retort:
I am rubber, you are glue, whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you!
HAHA- sucker
Now I wont argue your point that I was a crummy debater... but I would really hate to be you right now... I mean if I am crummy what the hell does that make you exactly? HAHA
No seriously though, what I was trying to illustrate to you, is the fact that I was once a dumb, naive, liberal. I like my arguments being based in facts. I had none to fall back on in the debate. This only underlines a bigger point that the reason I had no facts despite the typical distorted ones like...actually you should know what I am talking about...is because liberalism is not based in truth. This very conversation we are having is case-in-point (seriously read through what you have said and tell me that you have really attempted to have an intelligent conversation, you will see that you purposefully create more questions as a retort, because the facts do not agree with what you believe).
You are not being very courteous, Captain Courteous (I had to say it).
More standard talking points with no basis in reality.
HAHAHAHAHA.... wait a minute.... where are the facts to back up this generalized claim you have made? HAHAHA
This demonstrates that you don't have a clue. Big Business overwhelmingly supports conservatives. Always has. It is the conservatives that are always pro-tax breaks, exactly what Big Business wants. Your lack of knowledge is starting to get funny.
Again, LOOK AT THE FACTS, NAIVE-ONE, look at the donor list; Big Biz sent to your party in greater sums, I know this may come as a complete shock right now, but facts are unfortunately facts. Big Business actually does not like conservative policies because they create an environment that forces Big Biz to actually compete in the market place (the great equalizer). What is it to Big Biz if they get Taxed higher, but are able to limit competition amongst them (can you say job security)? Because they will make more money regardless; the "higher taxes" are there to only pacify people like you, who think that Higher taxes are cutting Big Biz to size. Again Big Biz has the lobbyist in Washington, not the small startup businesses.
I don't respond to silly partisan hack talking points. They are illogical anyway. But please restate them, and if they have substance, I will respond.
Hey at the rate your going, I would love for you to not respond to my questions. By the way, does that mean by answering your questions, I answered a nonpartisan, non-silly set of questions? If so, what makes my questions the opposite? Are you afraid that you might "accidentally" stumble across reality in the process of answering the questions? I mean I can vouch for you up to this point, you have been just superb at being delusional/irrational. A close minded person as yourself might not get brain washed.... I promise.... HAHAHAHA
