- Joined
- Nov 16, 2017
- Messages
- 69,238
- Reaction score
- 63,934
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ro...t-says-hes-prepared-for-the-fight-of-his-life
"Roger Stone slams Mueller indictment, says he's prepared for the fight of his life"
Good for him. A person who is not willing to fight for their own honor is a person whose life means very little.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ro...t-says-hes-prepared-for-the-fight-of-his-life
"Roger Stone slams Mueller indictment, says he's prepared for the fight of his life"
Good for him. A person who is not willing to fight for their own honor is a person whose life means very little.
Bad news awaits you here. You cannot spin this. Stone is toast. Enjoy.....
https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-indictment-roger-stone
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ro...t-says-hes-prepared-for-the-fight-of-his-life
"Roger Stone slams Mueller indictment, says he's prepared for the fight of his life"
Good for him. A person who is not willing to fight for their own honor is a person whose life means very little.
This has nothing to do with what "I" think about Stone's complicity.
Read what I wrote and stop pretending you understood context.
Why am I picturing a DIrty Dancing number with Trump and Stone doing "I've had the time (crime?) of my life"
Question is...who plays Baby? I am thinking Roger Stone.
Except Mueller IS putting Baby in the corner.
Good for him. A person who is not willing to fight for their own honor is a person whose life means very little.
Wow...What a Avatar!....
He's a "dirty trickster", and now a crook, who broke the law repeatedly, with criminal intent, in efforts to obstruct a lawful Federal investigation.
By continuing to fight our DOJ and hide the truth, he's not accepting his guilt, nor is he asking forgiveness. He's standing by his crimes like the unethical fool he is.
Cohen in contrast, has come clean, and is on the path to regaining some of the honor he lost in serving the deplorable, corrupt, and phony, David Dennison.
WWJD? Trix appears to believe he'd commit crimes, and then not ask for forgiveness. How far some on the Right have fallen.
He's got no honor, and he's knows he's guilty, and you know it too.I love how you dishonestly made it look like I believe Stone is innocent of the charges outlined in the indictment.
Every citizen in this country accused of a criminal offense should fight for their honor if they believe they are innocent or their life means very little... That's what I wrote!
Now you're claiming my demonstrable superior standard of ethics to yours, are fake? Based no nothing?WWJD? He'd tell you to save your fake piety.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ro...t-says-hes-prepared-for-the-fight-of-his-life
"Roger Stone slams Mueller indictment, says he's prepared for the fight of his life"
Good for him. A person who is not willing to fight for their own honor is a person whose life means very little.
"Roger Stone slams Mueller indictment
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ro...t-says-hes-prepared-for-the-fight-of-his-life
"Roger Stone slams Mueller indictment, says he's prepared for the fight of his life"
Good for him. A person who is not willing to fight for their own honor is a person whose life means very little.
How Michael Cohen went from saying he would 'take a bullet' for Trump to implicating him in federal crimes
https://www.businessinsider.com/mic...take-a-bullet-for-trump-to-a-plea-deal-2018-8
Perhaps it's correct to dismiss Stone's bravado.
However, Cohen did not plead guilty to new crimes in order to implicate Trump. He pled guilty to an existing indictment in which he claims Trump is involved.
What indictment would Stone plead guilty to that would involve Trump?
Yep, from "I would take a bullet for Trump" to "I am pleading guilty to crimes that Trump is a co-conspirator in."
Don't know. Guess we'll find out. Stone's indictment suggests that Trump or a family member ordered a senior campaign official to order him to coordinate with Wikileaks, which would be conspiracy. We'll see.
As per the indictment, somebody was asked to reach out to Stone to find out if Wikileaks were planning any future releases. As per the indictment, Stone wasn't sure himself.
That's a long way to coordination.
It's also a long way from ' Trump & Co. conspired to throw the election.'
From the indictment...
"After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign."
Trumpanzees: HE'S INNOCENT! IT'S A PERJURY TRAP! DDDDEEEEEEEEEEPP SSTTTAAAAAAAATE!" :lol:
Let's revisit ohhh.... about a year ago:
And two years ago:
Timeline: The Roger Stone indictment fills in new details about WikiLeaks and the Trump campaign
June 22, 2016. WikiLeaks reaches out to Guccifer 2.0 (apparently over Twitter) to request he/they “end any new material [stolen from the DNC] here for us to review and it will have a much higher impact than what you are doing.”
Yes. Thank you. The Trump campaign DID NOT KNOW WHAT WIKILEAKS HAD. You'd think that if the campaign coordinated in HACKING those emails, if they had COORDINATED with Russia in breaking into the files, IT WOULD KNOW. That they asked an ex staffer to find out suggests they had no knowledge. Thus no role in the hack and no conspiracy with Russia.
And this by the way, comes to us courtesy of Mr. Mueller.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?