• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Roger Stone slams Mueller indictment, says he's prepared for the fight of his life

Once all the steps are confirmed (assuming they can be proven, which I admit may be difficult), then that will be the coordination. There are more than enough crimes in the indictment that Stone could serve for five years. Like everybody else, it not impossible that he too will flip.



You don't get to establish where the goal posts are placed. I don't care which magical standard must be reached in order to impress you.

How about legal goal posts? Is it illegal to ask some guy to ask somebody else about some information he or she might have?
 
Yes. Thank you. The Trump campaign DID NOT KNOW WHAT WIKILEAKS HAD. You'd think that if the campaign coordinated in HACKING those emails, if they had COORDINATED with Russia in breaking into the files, IT WOULD KNOW. That they asked an ex staffer to find out suggests they had no knowledge. Thus no role in the hack and no conspiracy with Russia.
And this by the way, comes to us courtesy of Mr. Mueller.

Non sense...Indictment names a Senior Campaign official coordinated with Stone and gave info to trump...Clear COLLUSION
 
Last edited:
Proving you didn't read any of those links.

And yet Stone was not charged. He'll be charged at a later date? Why? Why not charge him everything later? Who cares about a few perjury charges if he was conspiring to throw the election (which is what Mueller was hired to do anyways)?
 
How about legal goal posts? Is it illegal to ask some guy to ask somebody else about some information he or she might have?

That's another goal post you're setting, which is the suggestion that it only matters if it's illegal. Again, you don't get to establish where the goal posts are placed. I don't care which magical standard must be reached in order to impress you.
 
Non sense...Indictment names a Senior Campaign official coordinate with Stone and gave info to trump...Clear COLLUSION

Collusion with what? For what? The campaign didn't know what somebody else had? In other words, it was a done deal. The files were hacked, they were transmitted to Wikileaks apparently. And the campaign had no knowledge of any of it.
 
That's another goal post you're setting, which is the suggestion that it only matters if it's illegal. Again, you don't get to establish where the goal posts are placed. I don't care which magical standard must be reached in order to impress you.

For purposes of Mr. Mueller, yes, that's what matters. That's the goalposts. He is an investigator. His personal opinions of Trump are irrelevant. His job isn't opposition research for a hypothetical 2020 challenger.
 
For purposes of Mr. Mueller, yes, that's what matters. That's the goalposts. He is an investigator. His personal opinions of Trump are irrelevant. His job isn't opposition research for a hypothetical 2020 challenger.

That's another goal post you're setting, which is the suggestion that what matters is only what matters to Mueller. Again, you don't get to establish where the goal posts are placed. I don't care which magical standard must be reached in order to impress you.
 
Collusion with what? For what? The campaign didn't know what somebody else had? In other words, it was a done deal. The files were hacked, they were transmitted to Wikileaks apparently. And the campaign had no knowledge of any of it.

Again...Slowly...A Senior Campaign Official....They even have an Email to Stone....Good Job...To think trump and his goons didn't collude with stone ,Wikileaks thru Russia,,,Is Absurd...Mueller no doubt has much more evidence...Watch and See
 



I went to https://www.stonedefensefund.com to make a donation, because he seems to now be under seige by the MakeWarOnRussia lobby. Strange that a guy who was part of Nixon's presidential campaign during the height of the Cold War with Moscow would now magically be some stooge of Moscow. Just like how it's strange that a president who's sought to rebuild the US military and make it as strong as possible is somehow claimed to be trying to make America weak against Russia.

When I see the demise of JFK and how this was all blamed on Russia back in the day - after which this alleged Russian role was quickly forgotten - then it makes me think that Russia has become America's institutionalized scapegoat of convenience for domestic political disputes in America. When in doubt, blame Russia.
 
Deny, deny, deny, counterattack...yeah we understand how your philosophy works but it's not going to work this time.

Since you KNOW how this is all going to work out for Stone and Trump, tell us.
 
You seem to be supporting this traitor.......Sad to see Americans supporting this creep

That's because it is difficult to tell where Donald Trump ends and Roger Stone begins sometimes.
 
Deny, deny, deny, counterattack...yeah we understand how your philosophy works but it's not going to work this time.

Why don't you speak in specifics, instead of using these deliberately vague weasel words like "meddling", "denial", "collusion", etc?

Mueller has indicted Stone over inaccuracies in his testimony to Congress. He hasn't indicted Stone for working as an agent of Russia.

If you're claiming that inaccuracies in Stone's testimony to Congress make him an agent of Russia, then make your case. But you have no case to make - so you're just resorting to the vague weasel words.
 
He's a "dirty trickster", and now a crook, who broke the law repeatedly, with criminal intent, in efforts to obstruct a lawful Federal investigation.
By continuing to fight our DOJ and hide the truth, he's not accepting his guilt, nor is he asking forgiveness. He's standing by his crimes like the unethical fool he is.

Cohen in contrast, has come clean, and is on the path to regaining some of the honor he lost in serving the deplorable, corrupt, and phony, David Dennison.

WWJD? Trix appears to believe he'd commit crimes, and then not ask for forgiveness. How far some on the Right have fallen.

It is the Oliver North approach.
"Yeah, I broke the law, you're damn right I did, because I serve the President, and his above the law, you got a problem with that?"

Never mind that millions of people got caught up in Reagan/CIA cocaine as the cheap stuff flooded the cities, never mind that even Fawn Hall herself had to check into rehab after being found wandering the streets of Venice California trying to score some crack. It doesn't matter, because one must fall on one's sword to protect their dying king.

Nothing matters, not even America or Americans matter, only the king matters, and if you defend your king, you can pretend you're some kind of patriot, even as the paper shredding machines overheat and seize up in the background.
 



I went to https://www.stonedefensefund.com to make a donation, because he seems to now be under seige by the MakeWarOnRussia lobby. Strange that a guy who was part of Nixon's presidential campaign during the height of the Cold War with Moscow would now magically be some stooge of Moscow. Just like how it's strange that a president who's sought to rebuild the US military and make it as strong as possible is somehow claimed to be trying to make America weak against Russia.

When I see the demise of JFK and how this was all blamed on Russia back in the day - after which this alleged Russian role was quickly forgotten - then it makes me think that Russia has become America's institutionalized scapegoat of convenience for domestic political disputes in America. When in doubt, blame Russia.


The Russia you speak of is far different than the Old Soviet Union which is long gone...Unlike you I have been to Russia.....And have No doubt they sought to influence the elections with willing partners like Stone...It is 2019 not 1959...Try to keep up...Did you get suckered into donating to the wall also???
 
Why don't you speak in specifics, instead of using these deliberately vague weasel words like "meddling", "denial", "collusion", etc?

Mueller has indicted Stone over inaccuracies in his testimony to Congress. He hasn't indicted Stone for working as an agent of Russia.

If you're claiming that inaccuracies in Stone's testimony to Congress make him an agent of Russia, then make your case. But you have no case to make - so you're just resorting to the vague weasel words.

Stone worked with WikiLeaks, who obtained the Stolen E-Mails thru Russia...That information was passed on to trump and his goons.....Gosh you must be so proud of these dirtbags
 
The Russia you speak of is far different than the Old Soviet Union which is long gone...Unlike you I have been to Russia.....And have No doubt they sought to influence the elections with willing partners like Stone...It is 2019 not 1959...Try to keep up...Did you get suckered into donating to the wall also???

Oh, I see - you're lamenting for the "good old days" of the old Soviet Union, which now no longer exists and has been replaced by the weaker and less socialistic Russia.

Because SovietMoscow good, RussianMoscow bad.

Well, then I assume you were then likewise suckered into donating to Ocasio-Cortez, who's been neighing out similar ideas to yours.

alexandria-cortez-720x340.jpg


alexandria.jpg


Free everything for everyone - but imprison Stone?

When this gamesmanship is defeated, the Left will never be able to live it down. They'll spend the rest of their days claiming that they never made any claims about Russia.
 
Free everything for everyone - but imprison Stone?

When this gamesmanship is defeated, the Left will never be able to live it down. They'll spend the rest of their days claiming that they never made any claims about Russia.

What do you have against arresting crooks? I'm for law and order. Why aren't you?
 
Oh, I see - you're lamenting for the "good old days" of the old Soviet Union, which now no longer exists and has been replaced by the weaker and less socialistic Russia.

Because SovietMoscow good, RussianMoscow bad.

Well, then I assume you were then likewise suckered into donating to Ocasio-Cortez, who's been neighing out similar ideas to yours.

alexandria-cortez-720x340.jpg


alexandria.jpg


Free everything for everyone - but imprison Stone?

When this gamesmanship is defeated, the Left will never be able to live it down. They'll spend the rest of their days claiming that they never made any claims about Russia.

What About What About....You deflect and dodge...Stone is a traitor...Either he talks or he goes to jail...But don't worry Mueller has info on trump and his other goons...Now go babble about a freshman Congress person
 
Stone worked with WikiLeaks, who obtained the Stolen E-Mails thru Russia...That information was passed on to trump and his goons.....Gosh you must be so proud of these dirtbags

It's a crazy assertion. Stone had no special back-channels to Wikileaks and has said so. There's a game going on to make him bear false witness against Trump. Mueller wants to wear him down financially, so that he'll have to bend to whatever Mueller wants him to do.

So if Wikileaks worked for Russia, then why have so many Leftists worldwide given awards to the leaker who made Wikileaks famous?


So Assange was a celebrated SJW until suddenly he wasn't? Until suddenly he decided to take on someone the Left was trying to coronate, like Hillary Clinton?
 
What do you have against arresting crooks? I'm for law and order. Why aren't you?

What did Stone do that makes him a crook? He's pro-Trump -- so how's that against the law? I'm pro-Trump too.
 
What did Stone do that makes him a crook? He's pro-Trump -- so how's that against the law? I'm pro-Trump too.

I guess you didn't read his indictment. He'll end up being written in history as a traitor. And here you are siding with him. Go figure.
 
I guess you didn't read his indictment. He'll end up being written in history as a traitor. And here you are siding with him. Go figure.
And the liberal democrats consider Edward Kennedy a hero, even though it is a proven fact that he worked directly with the Kremlin in his failed run for president against Reagan...

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom