- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 44,814
- Reaction score
- 20,221
- Location
- A very blue state
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
this isnt something that happened a year ago.....it is a bout a super bowl ad to aired this weekend....it just happens to be the same family in the another cheerios commercial
My point was about his decision making, which has nothing to do about the TV channels.So the point you tried to make previously was fatuous nonsense? Duly noted.
My point was about his decision making, which has nothing to do about the TV channels.eace
You get credit for being consistent, you did this when conservatives where making the stupid first amendment argument. So many people are so ignorant of the constitution. Usually the ones who claim to love it the most...
Republican Party bans MSNBC over ‘offensive’ tweet tied to Cheerios ad | OnPolitics
my only question is does anyone really expect better from MSNBC?
The tweet last night was outrageous and unacceptable. We immediately acknowledged that it was offensive and wrong, apologized and deleted it. We have dismissed the person responsible for the tweet. I personally apologize to Mr. Priebus and to everyone offended. At MSNBC, we believe in passionate, strong debate about the issues, and we invite voices from all sides to participate. That will never change.
Republican Party bans MSNBC over ‘offensive’ tweet tied to Cheerios ad | OnPolitics
my only question is does anyone really expect better from MSNBC?
Republican Party bans MSNBC over ‘offensive’ tweet tied to Cheerios ad | OnPolitics
my only question is does anyone really expect better from MSNBC?
Agreed. It seems as though Reince Priebus is cutting off his nose to spite his face. Banning Republicans from appearing on MSNBC is pretty stupid, in my opinion. Perhaps the Republicans should bring Michael Steel back, I think he did a much better job than Priebus does.
I expect as much out of MSNBC as I expect out of FOX.:doh
Why is this even a big deal? I don't get it....biracial family in a commercial and people get their panties in a wad? Then a clearly partisan source says something clearly partisan about it...
What happened to the righteous anger over the Duck Dynasty BS? Fine, First Amendment doesn't apply but where are your principles when you're against one guy getting "punished" for his views, and then go and "punish" a whole network for it?
Except ratings.
I think the fact that MSNBC has worse ratings is a complement to Democrats.
Anyone that watches MSNBC hates Republicans, anyhow.
Not sure where you get that from.
Anyone that watches MSNBC hates Republicans, anyhow.
Then read the Republican platform dealing with women's issues .Don't forget their narrative is also republicans hate women too.
Shout it, Shout it, Shout it out loud !I do and i don't. Some interesting perspective...
Claiming that the "right wing" as some kind of all encompassing entity has a problem with interacial marriage...which is entirely false and is the problem with making wide reaching, hyperbolic, bigoted statements such as that.
As highlighted in part by one prominent right wing media figure that's actively part of a biracial marriage helping to start the twitter anger towards the post.
But then, something tells me based on your completely obtuse, hyperbolic, hyper partisan post there that some common sense and reasonable judgement of a situation isn't something I should hold my breath waiting for out of you.
Which is exactly what you said about Rush. Right?
That reminds me of Liberals being afraid of saying out loud that they are liberals.
Or conservatives saying out loud that they are Republicans.
Shout it, Shout it, Shout it out loud !
I do and i don't. Some interesting perspective...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?