Report: George Zimmerman's wife says he threatened her[W:152] (1 Viewer)

[AGENT J]

Report: George Zimmerman's wife says he threatened her

Report: George Zimmerman's wife says he threatened her

John Bacon and Doug Stanglin, USA TODAY3:28 p.m. EDT September 9, 2013

​

Police in a central Florida town say they are investigating an incident involving George Zimmerman after his estranged wife reported that he was threatening her and her father with a gun.
Shellie Zimmerman filed for divorce last week.

CNN quotes police as saying that Zimmerman is in "investigative custody." Lake Mary Police Chief Steve Bracknell told the Associated Press that Shellie Zimmerman called police shortly after 2 p.m. on Monday. Bracknell says Zimmerman hasn't been arrested and officers are at the house trying to determine what happened.
Orlando TV station WKMG reports that Shellie Zimmerman's parents, David and Machelle Dean, live at the home.
WKMG's SKY 6 helicopter of the scene shows at least a half-dozen police squad cars outside the house.
In the divorce petition, Shellie Zimmerman says she and her husband separated a month after Zimmerman, who is Hispanic, was acquitted of any crime for fatally shooting black teenager Trayvon Martin last July. The verdict sparked protests across the nation.

Zimmerman has been pulled over at least twice for speeding since his acquittal.

Back-up links:
Police: George Zimmerman's estranged wife calls saying he threatened her, her dad with gun. | Fox News
George Zimmerman taken into police custody after incident with wife - CNN.com

seems news on him just wont stop
for the record i NEVER thought he would be convicted of murder 2, ever
he always seemed like a douche and i would never want him on my neighborhood watch

 

[shrubnose]

Report: George Zimmerman's wife says he threatened her


Back-up links:
Police: George Zimmerman's estranged wife calls saying he threatened her, her dad with gun. | Fox News
George Zimmerman taken into police custody after incident with wife - CNN.com

seems news on him just wont stop

It looks like George Zimmermans 15 minutes of fame is going to last a little longer.

He's in the news again: George Zimmerman taken into custody after incident with gun - 60 Minutes Overtime - CBS News




This might get really interesting.

I wonder what Zimmerman's explanation for this kerfuffle will be?
for the record i NEVER thought he would be convicted of murder 2, ever
he always seemed like a douche and i would never want him on my neighborhood watch

I wonder what Zimmerman's explanation for this kerfuffle will be?

I won't be surprised if he says that he was just standing his ground against his wife and her parents and since he was outnumbered he thought that the best thing for him to do was point his gun at them.




Maybe one of the TV networks should start a new reality series on 'Stand Your Ground' Shootouts, With Zimmerman as the star, naturally.

 

[head of joaquin]

I wonder what Zimmerman's explanation for this kerfuffle will be?

I won't be surprised if he says that he was just standing his ground against his wife and her parents and since he was outnumbered he thought that the best thing for him to do was point his gun at them.




Maybe one of the TV networks should start a new reality series on 'Stand Your Ground' Shootouts, With Zimmerman as the star, naturally.

He'll claim that his wife is a pot-smoking street thug who threatened his life with a pillow case.

 

[shrubnose]

He'll claim that his wife is a pot-smoking street thug who threatened his life with a pillow case.

It will be his word against hers and she has already been convicted of perjury so whose word will be believed?

The plot sickens.

 

[Excon]

Report: George Zimmerman's wife says he threatened her


Back-up links:
Police: George Zimmerman's estranged wife calls saying he threatened her, her dad with gun. | Fox News
George Zimmerman taken into police custody after incident with wife - CNN.com

seems news on him just wont stop
for the record i NEVER thought he would be convicted of murder 2, ever
he always seemed like a douche and i would never want him on my neighborhood watch

:doh

Really?

The report has been clarified by the police. There was no gun involved.

 

[AGENT J]

:doh

Really?

​

yes really
what part dont you get

 

[Excon]

yes really
what part dont you get

:doh
What was it you don't get about the reports being wrong?

 

[AGENT J]

:doh
Obviously the part where you are wrong.

thats what i thought you got nothing, thanks for playing, "i" am not wrong about anything posted

 

[Excon]

thats what i thought you got nothing, thanks for playing, "i" am not wrong about anything posted

Figures!
:doh

What did you not understand about what was previously provided?

The report has been clarified by the police. There was no gun involved.

If this is correct, what you provided wasn't.
It is that simple.

 

[AGENT J]

Figures!
:doh

What did you not understand about what was previously provided?

​

If this is correct, what you provided wasn't.
It is that simple.

thank you for proving my point, i gave three links and "I" never said anything about a gun
thanks for playing,"I" wasnt wrong about anything, you lose as usual
its that simple

 

[Excon]

thank you for proving my point, i gave three links and "I" never said anything about a gun
thanks for playing,"I" wasnt wrong about anything, you lose as usual
its that simple

Still as obstinate as ever.
What you provided is in question.
Period.
You don't get to hide behind because they said it. That is dishonesty. You provided it.

Thanks for playing, but you lose.

The report has been clarified by the police. There was no gun involved.

Funny thing here is, that when I asked "really", and provided what Beaudreaux said, all you had to do was say that maybe the the other reports were wrong. But noooooooo, you apparently took it personally and seem to want to to fight about it for some inexplicable reason. :lamo

 

[Sheik Yerbuti]

You don't get to hide behind because they said it. That is dishonesty. You provided it.

Thanks for playing, but you lose.

The report has been clarified by the police. There was no gun involved.

It's hysterical how you state he "can't hide behind because they said it" while at the same time, you hide behind Beaudreaux's [unsubstantiated] claim that no gun was involved because he said it. You quote him as though his claim is gospel rather than quote a news source.

 

[Excon]

It's hysterical how you state he "can't hide behind because they said it" while at the same time, you hide behind Beaudreaux's [unsubstantiated] claim that no gun was involved because he said it. You quote him as though his claim is gospel rather than quote a news source.

:doh

:lamo :lamo
There you go again not paying attention to that which came before.

Do you not understand what the use of the word "if" means?

thats what i thought you got nothing, thanks for playing, "i" am not wrong about anything posted

Figures!
:doh

What did you not understand about what was previously provided?

The report has been clarified by the police. [COLOR="#f0000"]There was no gun involved.[/COLOR]

If this is correct, what you provided wasn't.
It is that simple.

 

[Beaudreaux]

:doh

:lamo :lamo
There you go again not paying attention to that which came before.

Do you not understand what the use of the word "if" means?

​

For the time being, "domestic violence can't be invoked because she has changed her story and says she didn't see a firearm," Bracknell said.

 

[year2late]

I am going to say the only thing that is REALLY important.

Thank God that couple did not procreate.

 

[Sheik Yerbuti]

:doh

:lamo :lamo
There you go again not paying attention to that which came before.

Do you not understand what the use of the word "if" means?

​

So? You were still hiding behind his posts because you didn't have a news source to rely on. Yet at the same time, you're accusing others of doing what you were doing. :roll:

Project much?

 

[Excon]

So? You were still hiding behind his posts because you didn't have a news source to rely on. Yet at the same time, you're accusing others of doing what you were doing. :roll:

Project much?

You can attempt to spin all you want. It ain't gonna get you anywhere.
I showed that it may not be true by saying "if" even though I knew it was being reported.

You are the one who failed to read and realize that.

 

[Sheik Yerbuti]

You can attempt to spin all you want. It ain't gonna get you anywhere.
I showed that it may not be true by saying "if" even though I knew it was being reported.

You are the one who failed to read and realize that.

I'm not spinning anything. You were hiding behind Beaudreaux's claim because you didn't have a news source you could quote. So you pushed that quote lieu of the news source you were lacking.

 

[SBu]

Better question: Who will play Zimmerman in the movie?

 

[Excon]

I'm not spinning anything. You were hiding behind Beaudreaux's claim because you didn't have a news source you could quote. So you pushed that quote lieu of the news source you were lacking.

Yeah you are spinning, or are seriously confused.
I didn't hide behind anything.
I asked him "really" and provided what Beaudreaux said. (already having looked up the information.)

Zimmerman's wife won't press charges despite call
Look at the time the first comment was made.

• 
  Rena McGee • 4 hours ago
  Why am I not in any way surprised by this sequence of events?
• 
  James A Clark • 3 hours ago
  Wow, what a shocker! Who knew he was capable of anything like this!

That is me asking a question based on what another has said. That is not hiding. You saying so, is you spinning.

In addition, in response to his reply in the above exchange, I then stated "If this is correct, what you provided wasn't.", which you failed to read or understand.

 

[Excon]

Better question: Who will play Zimmerman in the movie?

I vote for Emilio Estevez - when he was younger. :2razz:

 

[SBu]

I vote for Emilio Estevez - when he was younger. :2razz:

What about Fluffy in his first dramatic role?

 

[AGENT J]

Still as obstinate as ever.
What you provided is in question.
Period.
You don't get to hide behind because they said it. That is dishonesty. You provided it.

Thanks for playing, but you lose.
Funny thing here is, that when I asked "really", and provided what Beaudreaux said, all you had to do was say that maybe the the other reports were wrong. But noooooooo, you apparently took it personally and seem to want to to fight about it for some inexplicable reason. :lamo

translation: you are still factually wrong and have been proven to be wrong and that remains i didnt post anything wrong, not one thing
not personal your post made ZERO sense and was illogical
facts destroy your meaningless post again

 

[AGENT J]

It's hysterical how you state he "can't hide behind because they said it" while at the same time, you hide behind Beaudreaux's [unsubstantiated] claim that no gun was involved because he said it. You quote him as though his claim is gospel rather than quote a news source.

ding ding ding
its beyond illogical that he thinks it has anything to do with me
i stated nothign about a gun anywhere, hell i dindt even say the story was factual and i believe it all lol

 

[Sheik Yerbuti]

Yeah you are spinning, or are seriously confused.
I didn't hide behind anything.
I asked him "really" and provided what Beaudreaux said. (already having looked up the information.)

Zimmerman's wife won't press charges despite call
Look at the time the first comment was made.​

That is me asking a question based on what another has said. That is not hiding. You saying so, is you spinning.

In addition, in response to his reply in the above exchange, I then stated "If this is correct, what you provided wasn't.", which you failed to read or understand.

You can deny it all you want, you were hiding behind Beaudreaux's claim because you had no other source you could rely on.

Further, here you are again quoting Beaudreaux and not a news source (i.e., hiding behind Beaudreaux) ...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...an-after-911-call-wife-12.html#post1062295404

And again ...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...an-after-911-call-wife-10.html#post1062295323

And again ...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...fe-says-he-threatened-her.html#post1062295282

And again ...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimme...-says-he-threatened-her-2.html#post1062295572