• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report: 2 NJ men arrested on terrorism charges

Redress

Liberal Fascist For Life!
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
112,993
Reaction score
60,559
Location
Sarasota Fla
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Report: 2 NJ men arrested on terrorism charges - Yahoo! News


It's nice when the good guys win one.
 
It wasn't the Reverend and I, I can tell you that. :2razz:

Good for all law enforcement involved. Glad to see two potential murderers are now in custody.
 
Why were they arrested?
From the article it seems like they were planning on killing soldiers, no?
Release them to Turkey immediately.
 
Why were they arrested?
From the article it seems like they were planning on killing soldiers, no?
Release them to Turkey immediately.


Why release them to Turkey? Turkey apparently is low on terrorist or their recruitment must be down? Maybe they need to organize a bake sale... :shrug:
 
Last edited:
If anyone is being honest they would HAVE to admit that Obama (while carrying on MOST of the Bush practices) has done a GOOD JOB fighting terror. The fact is its going to get worse not better.

To your point - I think it's because Obama's carried on Bush's practices ... however I do not like the way Obama and his administration continues to dismiss Islam radicalists by playing name / word games. Whether it's PC nonsense or it's their held belief that those who perpetrate these terrorist activities are not nor should they be identified in the same sentence as Islam I think hurts more than helps. But that's ideology and semantics. The actions speak louder than words and we as a Country are killing and catching would-be terrorists - though 1 got through --- Hassan, and 2 failed due to either chance or lack of training. So... results are mixed.
 

No. We were told that under Bush there NO terrorist attacks after 9/11 (which, by the way, isn't true) and therefore he protected us. There have been (if you use the Bush definition) NO terrorist attacks (again, this is only saying if you believe there weren't any under Bush). Thus they are equal if you use those standards.

Now, I maintain that there were terror attacks under Bush. The Anthrax killer (caught only after the attacks were halted). The DC Snipers.

So, if you're going to count the Texas Army Base shooter, then the Anthrax killer and DC Snipers have to count for Bush.
 
And they're Muslims, too. Surprise, surprise!!!
 

Eh, I still don't consider Hasan to be a terrorist. He shot at soldiers. We're at war, when OUR forces shoot at Al-Qaeda fighters we call it... well, "war." Soldiers are a legitimate target, and while I hate it, that does also apply to our guys. Try to flip the scenario around. CIA operatives convince an Al-Qaeda fighter to turn on his comrades. He shoots up one of their training camps. Is he committing terrorism? Is the CIA committing terrorism?

More on-topic, I agree. Whether we use the phrase "radical Islam" is entirely irrelevant. It's just a giant decoy for people to attack. What really matters is what we do, and in our anti-terrorism stance Obama has not substantially differed from Bush. (a subject of much irritation for me!) As I've often said on this board, I voted for Change and I got Bush III.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…