CrabCake
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2014
- Messages
- 1,925
- Reaction score
- 694
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
I never read the article as part of my PHD in theology ....
I read it as a view from an ordinary Joe and who does not wear a religious collar and does not ever claim to be theologian.
It is like reading a story concerning politics or finance even if the person writing does not have a Masters Degree.
But, not to worry. I am not offended.
If everybody enjoyed the read as much as I did, it would of been a NYT best seller. But obviously it was not.
Balm
It is presented as if it were fact. Thus it is reasonable to question the sources and qualifications of the person making these claims. As it turns out, the claims are un-sourced, the person is unqualified, and the things he says fly in the face of what actual researchers on this topic currently believe. It is legitimate, therefore, to call that what it is...rubbish.
The dominant theories among those who see religion as coming from man are:
1. The psychological view: religion is the result of the HADD and the development of human's ability to (mis)apply agency to all things.
2. The adaptational view: religion served as a glue that united communities, giving them a greater chance of survival.
Neither of those theories resembles what that blogger described. If we go further into the field of philosophy of religion, we find only theories that are even further from what that blogger described (since he was aiming for a pseudo-scientific view). That's before we even get to the theories that don't pre-suppose the non-existence of God.
In a nutshell, no one who actually researches this topic believes as that blogger does. In all likelihood, the person who wrote that blog post never researched this topic and is simply repeating things that he has heard other unqualified people say and that make sense to him. As a result of posts like that one, other unqualified people will read his views and believe them and then repeat them later to other unqualified people who will repeat them to others, etc... perpetuating the chain of ignorance.
I think it's correct to call people out for helping perpetuate ignorance.
Last edited: