• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Racist Paedophile ring [W:348 & 389]

Status
Not open for further replies.
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

I feel, the danger--is we still do not get the step change needed, for fear of being called 'it's racist' to tackle said communities.

It depends on what you mean by 'targeting said communities', Paul. Target them with what? Target them by ascribing some kind of collective blame might well stray towards dangerous ground. But targeting suspects from that community, as one would suspects from any community, without pandering or applying over-sensitive methods would seem only correct. It might also be worth connecting with the community leaders, and at more of a street level with younger members of the Pakistani population to examine, address and educate on fairly fundamental issues of respect for women, intolerance of extreme sexual aggression and on the importance of integration and co-existence.

Scapegoating an entire ethnic community for the aberrant behaviour of a few criminals would seem to me to be counter-productive, and you have to be very careful to make the distinction between 'targeting', however you wish to do it, and 'scapegoating' very clear indeed.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

Yes, we must be very careful not to offend ethnic communities when young girls are being 'groomed' and raped. That must be the first priority.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]


Who says the Brit isn't a racist? If his purpose in going to Thailand is purely to rape young girls because he considers them racially inferior and therefore worthy of being raped, then he's a racist.

Try again.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]


All you seem capable of is repeating old lies. I asked you a question about the CPS and no response (didn't think you would) as you knew the lie about a "rape jihad" and "trying desperately to make this a white problem" would not be backed up by the facts.

However, a few years ago when the chorus of lies that muslims were responsible for the majority of rapes / majority of child sexual abuse came out I challenged this. You got your butt kicked and have been sore ever since. Andy and Manc Skipper have posted links to the actual figures which is that white males in the UK are responsible for approximately 80 - 90% of sexual abuse of children. No rape jihad but that doesn't suit you - so instead, you deflect with lies and attack. We have a serious problem in some areas where Pakistani muslims - seemingly taxi-drivers mostly - are picking up vulnerable young girls and grooming them. Nobody has denied this - what is denied is that it's a rape jihad or that these guys are responsible for the majority of sexual abuse against children.

Now, I expect you to conveniently ignore this and continue to lie about me. You and "your posse" who remain too blinded to see that actual statistics mean more than fake links from hate websites will never understand the basic facts.

You're just not worth my getting myself threadbanned for anymore - you posted false facts and you have fooled some people but I will simply continue to expose your lies when you dare post them.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

Who says the Brit isn't a racist? If his purpose in going to Thailand is purely to rape young girls because he considers them racially inferior and therefore worthy of being raped, then he's a racist.

Try again.

Where in the news reports did it say that the Pakistanis raped the underage girls because they were racially inferior?
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

I don't know, just a conclusion reached based on the race of the perpetrators, the race of the victims, and the Koran's teachings about how 'infidel' women are to be treated. But you are right - perhaps it was just a coincidence that all of the victims were white and the rapists were Pakistani Muslims. Maybe there were no Pakistani women available to be raped.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

Page 94


Later:

 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

I'm afraid your attempt to inject some reality is falling on deaf ears, IC, they don't want to know.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

I'm afraid your attempt to inject some reality is falling on deaf ears, IC, they don't want to know.

29 effin pages of lies and contempt for truth and statistics.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

You can hardly say we haven't been here before.

What is it that makes people look at crystal clear facts and reports and then blindly continue to assert a twisted version of truth which can only be defended by using the tactic of smear and attack and the inevitably predictable response of - "apologia," "white man's burden," "political correctness?"
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]


The Hindu community was certainly not concerned about being called 'racist', and good for them..
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

I'm afraid your attempt to inject some reality is falling on deaf ears, IC, they don't want to know.
In fact there have been any on these boards, including me, who have spoken out against the treatment of women and girls by Muslim men. The most common response to this is 'not all Muslims are __________. Fill in the bank.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

You can hardly say we haven't been here before.

Is that surprising when the problems still continue? Do you want the discussion of female abuse by Muslim men to end? That may stop when the abuse stops, and that could take a while.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]


Because when facts come into conflict with their prejudices it creates a cognitive dissonance and it's easier to either attack the facts or ignore them rather than to reconsider their preconceived dogma. the fact that such preconceived dogma is based on ignorance of the society they are observing doesn't really make any difference.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

-- a cognitive dissonance --

Haha, should have added that to my list of defence phrases that gets thrown out when cornered.

In fact there have been any on these boards, including me, who have spoken out against the treatment of women and girls by Muslim men. The most common response to this is 'not all Muslims are __________. Fill in the bank.

If it's that common - you'll easily be able to prove this with a link?

I shouldn't have to wait 4 days before a brave response as I had when a hate site was posted in response to my request for facts backing up a rape jihad...
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]


There is a section of this forum dedicated to these sorts of playground antics. Did you not know of it?

This isn't a group activity, though, as you seemed inordinately preoccupied with making it so, what with how you "butt kicked" me with the help of your underlings, and always going on and on about my much imagined following and whatnot. Since you have chosen women, especially, to call out and try to bully, were you thinking here that I had some sort of harem and so this elicits some primal cultural imperative in you or something? It seems most odd.

As to your statistics, I already explained how to interpret them in that thread two years ago by using the sort of basic math that American children learn by the time they are ten years old. In that thread you tried to claim that statistics revealing that if only 1/3 of a group has been identified by ethnicity, and only 49% of the group thus identified were white, that somehow meant the majority was white. What a ludicrous conclusion considering the true figure could be as low as 1/6 white not even factoring in the relative populations involved or the very real tendency to gloss over the ethnicity because they are Muslim as has been revealed to be the modus operandi of the very people whose inactivity is responsible for enabling this epidemic of child rape to begin with. . Now, just because you can find other people who lack the math proficiency necessary to understand how to interpret numbers, this does not mean your fallacious interpretation is correct. It just means that they are as improficient in math as you are.

I'm thinking here that if the schools in your culture would teach a little more basic math and a lot less cultural supremacy, the whole world might be better off.
 
Last edited:
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]


I did see that yes, and I disagreed with it earlier in this thread.

You see, I don't believe, although I'm sure this will emerge at trial, that the criminals in Rotherham were targetting any particular race - they just went for what was available and that, in a borough where 93.2% of the population are white, is almost certain to be white.

You're quite right, we have to be doubly vigilant, first to stamp out the behaviour, address the attitudes that cause it to happen and root out every last person who seeks to abuse the most vulnerable kids. No fear, no favour and no special treatment for any social or ethnic minority. Secondly, we have to protect those people who are likely to be the innocent victims of any hysterical and misinformed vigilante backlash. What's the betting there will be an increase in assaults on Asian shop-owners, 'Paki-bashing' sprees and fire-bombings of Mosques in the coming months? Rotherham's Moslem community must be feeling both shame and fear at the moment. There are fewer than 10,000 Moslems in the borough, they'll make an easy target.[/QUOTE]

You're right that there could be a backlash against the wider Muslim community. I do hope not.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

This isn't a group activity, though, as you seemed inordinately preoccupied with making it so, what with how you "destroyed" me with the help of your underlings, and always going on and on about my much imagined following and whatnot.

Did you run this by Grant, mbig and Wiggen before posting?
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

I did see that yes, and I disagreed with it earlier in this thread.

I must have missed that. Sorry.

You're in Bradford right? What's your impression of how feelings are running in both the Asian and non-Asian communities of the city? Rotherham's not that far away, I'm sure this must all be having an impact across S. and W. Yorkshire, isn't it?
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

Did you run this by Grant, mbig and Wiggen before posting?

I don't reference them when I am so insecure in my positions that I need the troops behind me. I don't do that stupid group thing.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

I don't do that stupid group thing.

No Gardener, sure you don't. :roll: There's that cognitive dissonance again, or maybe it's the air conditioner buzzing.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]



The CPS and government statistics just flew right by your head didn't they - just another inconvenient truth to ignore.

Dogmatism at its finest.
 
re: Racist Paedophile ring [W:348]

No Gardener, sure you don't. :roll: There's that cognitive dissonance again, or maybe it's the air conditioner buzzing.

Have you considered improving your deficient math skills instead of just saying whatever comes into your head?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…