alphamale
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2005
- Messages
- 1,120
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Southern California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
In Orange County, California, the son of a deputy sheriff (and two other men) are about to be sentenced for raping (with objects) a woman. The woman's name was withheld by the news media. But in other cases, where a charge of rape turns out to be false (e.g. Kobe Bryant) of course the false accuser's name was still with held. Why should this be done? To protect the supposed victim's "reputation"? What about the supposed perpetrator's reputation? I say that, as with all other crimes, all names should be made public. What do you say?