Keep in mind that a good deal of that depends on the students own definitions as well. Three, non-exclusive, one night stands with the same person basically qualifies as a "relationship" for some people these days. :roll:
In any case, the bottom line here is that no part of this thing works to accomplish better outcomes for students.
If these courses actually are selling what they claim to be selling (and I don't care how you try to spin it, that
is promiscuity), it is simply going to encourage dangerous and irresponsible behavior, and promote the kinds of unhealthy sexual attitudes which make it more common in the first place.
If it's a bait and switch, on the other hand, luring students in with the promise of more sex, just to lecture them on how they should wait for relationships instead,
no one is going to listen. They'll just keep right on doing what they've always done.
Frankly, what I suspect that this is
really going to be is a "perfect storm" of self-contradictory Left Wing social dogma; combining schizophrenic attitudes towards safe and responsible sex (i.e. promiscuity is fine, but make sure that it's
healthy
promiscuity), hearty input on the wonders of sexual deviancy from the "sex positive" brigade (Sure! You can masturbate 38 times a day! That's good for you!) , feminist pop-cultural nonsense that complicates the above to Hell and back (sex is great, but you're a rapist if she doesn't say 'yes' exactly X amount of times, and if your BAC is above X level, you're going to jail, and also, porn is demeaning, except when it's not), and
maybe some minor tid-bits about putting condoms on bananas that everyone knows already tacked on just to cover the instructors' asses.
Again, it's simply an example of misplaced progressive priorities all the way around.