Someone's sexually frustrated and bitter.
Who made you the spelling police?It's "pregnant", by the way.
I was making a joke about when I was 17, cause if you know a 17 year old guy, and he's presented with a situation where he could've gotten laid, but he got **** blocked by anyone, he despises them. Develop a sense of humor, you'll live longer.blogger31 said:I'm sorry you are right I was not accurate in that post. You would have despised the folks for saying that because now their daughters won't put out for you. Well if those are not lame excuses, what stops someone from using those excuses after the child is born.
But humans can survive air. This thing ceases to develop because of air. That's not alive as far as I'm concerned.NEWS FLASH! NEWS FLASH! This just in....doctors have learned that anything living, that is killed ceases development. More to come as this story develops.:shock:
Alright, the first two are bullshit analogies, and I really hope you know it, because if not you're just not smart. By actor and actors, I mean like if one dude is doing heroin, or if two people are doing heroin. A woman is not a participant in the rape, she's a victim, and if you can't draw that line, I'm amazed you can find the floor from your bed.So just for the actor and actors, as long as they are the only ones getting hurt? So rape is cool then as long as it is behind closed doors. I mean the woman is an actress in the rape, albeit not willing. We could apply that standard to child abuse and spouse abuse. I mean again we have an actor, albeit unwilling I am sure. Of course you are right let's not get on that guy in LA for doing heroin, I mean he only has kids that see it, are exposed to his habit, and are having their childhood's ruined by it, but it's in his home and it is really none of our business is it.
That's a matter of opinion, do you understand that?Again, it all comes down to responsibility. In abortion there is another person being hurt whether you want to believe that or not.
Boo ****ing hoo, a half a cent of your money will half to go to help someone else. You know the vast majority of welfare goes to corporations, and yet here you are ******* and moaning about less money than it would take to get a piece of Bazooka Joe. You know the war has cost the average household $2,000, I don't see you ******* and moaning about Bush's irresponsibility in not checking out the intelligence (or more likely fixing the intelligence) because he wanted to kill people, but here you are, ******* and moaning about sex.jamesrage said:Why should I care?Because a pregnate teenager means mother who will be on welfare and food stamps sucking up tax payer dollars.
If she decides to murder the baby that means the tax payer more than likely will foot the bill for the government sanctioned murder.
Well spoken. With all of the conviction of a mangy mongrel in heat.galenrox said:Man, if all the 17 year old girls I knew in high school had folks telling them to close they're legs I would've DESPISED THEM ALL!
Like, I really don't see why all of you have such a problem with sex? I really can't figure out why anyone would have a problem with it! I mean, it's a good time, it's something to do, why not?
Here are my theories on why you all hate sex so much:
1)Can't get laid, pissed off that other people can
2)Bible says it's bad, cause Jesus honestly cares SO MUCH about what I do with my dick
I really just don't get it! She's got a boyfriend, it's not like she's ****ing random dudes at truck stops, she's having sex with her boyfriend, and I'll tell you what, that's a lot more responsible than I was when I started having sex! But even if she was, so what? Why should you care, I mean, in the ****ing least bit, what makes you think that what goes on in someone else's bedroom/car/bathroom/kitchen/living room/hallway/front porch/elevator, or inside someone else's uterus is AT ALL your business?
galenrox said:I was making a joke about when I was 17, cause if you know a 17 year old guy, and he's presented with a situation where he could've gotten laid, but he got **** blocked by anyone, he despises them. Develop a sense of humor, you'll live longer.
But humans can survive air. This thing ceases to develop because of air. That's not alive as far as I'm concerned.
Alright, the first two are bullshit analogies, and I really hope you know it, because if not you're just not smart. By actor and actors, I mean like if one dude is doing heroin, or if two people are doing heroin. A woman is not a participant in the rape, she's a victim, and if you can't draw that line, I'm amazed you can find the floor from your bed.
As far as the kids go, there are lots of things parents can do that can ruin the kids's lives without them being illegal. You can call the kid a ******, or a bitch, or worthless, that's still legal, and that would still ruin the child's life. And doing heroin in front of your kids hurts your kids if used irresponsibly, and thus would merit losing ones kids, similarly to emotional abuse.
I really have difficulty believing that you're dumb enough to actually believe any of those were acurate interpretations of what I was saying.
That's a matter of opinion, do you understand that?
Boo ****ing hoo, a half a cent of your money will half to go to help someone else. You know the vast majority of welfare goes to corporations, and yet here you are ******* and moaning about less money than it would take to get a piece of Bazooka Joe. You know the war has cost the average household $2,000, I don't see you ******* and moaning about Bush's irresponsibility in not checking out the intelligence (or more likely fixing the intelligence) because he wanted to kill people, but here you are, ******* and moaning about sex.
It really does sound like the words of someone who hasn't been laid (and REALLY REALLY needs to).
Fantasea said:How about a brief respite to regain some decorum in this thread.
Name the author of the following quote and win a salute from me:
"While the deep concern of a woman bearing an unwanted child merits consideration and sympathy, it is my personal feeling that the legalization of abortion on demand is not in accordance with the value which our civilization places on human life. Wanted or unwanted, I believe that human life, even at its earliest stages, has certain rights which must be recognized – the right to be born, the right to love, the right to grow old.
"On the question of the individual's freedom of choice there are easily available birth-control methods and information which women may employ to prevent or postpone pregnancy. But once life has begun, no matter at what stage of growth, it is my belief that termination should not be decided merely by desire. ...
"When history looks back to this era it should recognize this generation as one which cared about human beings enough to halt the practice of war, to provide a decent living for every family, and to fulfill its responsibility to its children from the very moment of conception."
Fantasea said:How about a brief respite to regain some decorum in this thread.
Name the author of the following quote and win a salute from me:
"While the deep concern of a woman bearing an unwanted child merits consideration and sympathy, it is my personal feeling that the legalization of abortion on demand is not in accordance with the value which our civilization places on human life. Wanted or unwanted, I believe that human life, even at its earliest stages, has certain rights which must be recognized – the right to be born, the right to love, the right to grow old.
"On the question of the individual's freedom of choice there are easily available birth-control methods and information which women may employ to prevent or postpone pregnancy. But once life has begun, no matter at what stage of growth, it is my belief that termination should not be decided merely by desire. ...
"When history looks back to this era it should recognize this generation as one which cared about human beings enough to halt the practice of war, to provide a decent living for every family, and to fulfill its responsibility to its children from the very moment of conception."
jamesrage said:Oh the stupid liberal tactic.
Who made you the spelling police?
edb19 said:Amazingly enough - Ted Kennedy
Fantasea said::Just one more reason that term limits at the federal level makes sense.
vergiss said::lol: Someone's sexually frustrated and bitter.
It's "pregnant", by the way.
blogger31 said::naughty Here you go again, do we need to post all your mistakes as well. You are not exactly immune to typos now are you?
vergiss said:As I said: there are accidental mistakes (such as a finger slipping and putting a "c" where there should be a "v") which are genuine typos - and then there is willful ignorance (such as "u" to mean "you", or "pregnate" to mean "pregnant").
Sheesh, just because I want to improve people's literacy skills and stop them from raping the English language.
blogger31 said:OH I see your mistakes are accidents while everyone else is just plain stupid eh?:roll: Your mistakes are only typos and everyone else just doesn't have the mastery of the language that you do. :rofl
Me mentioning me when I wass 17 and wanting sex, if you don't see the humor, you must lead a fairly misearble life.blogger31 said:That's strange before you got all defensive because I was inaccurate, there was no mention of a joke then. It appears we have a story change here.
Fetuses (fetii?) cease to develop once subjected to air. That's not life in my opinion.Air is deadly?
I don't really get what you're getting at here.Hey you said actors, a child is an actor in abuse, only an unwilling one. Now that you speak of it I can't find the floor from my bed I have been in this bed my whole life.:roll:
No, I'm saying that just because some people might misuse something doesn't justify saying no one else can use it. I don't have any kids. None of my friends have any kids. Why shouldn't they be allowed to use these substances?Oh I see so since there are other ways to ruin a kids life, why not throw one more into the mix. I think I covered most of my thoughts on this on the other thread.
You in the real world where you don't need science, you just need religious belief to form fact? I don't know if you've looked up on things recently, but as far as fetuses go there's a thing called viability, after which abortions are now illegal. This would of course leave a time called previability, before the fetus can continue to develop outside of its mother's womb. At that point it is not considered a human and not considered alive, legally speaking, at that is also my personal belief, and many others's personal beliefs.That another human is being hurt during an abortion? No my friend that is what we in the real world call a fact. The only thing that is opinion is whether the human being hurt is allowed protection. But hey you are from Iowa I will let you slide on that one.
ScottMarian said:Dear Perry:
I recognize that you may not be aware of all of the writings of the Apostles. You state that the Bible does not deal directly with abortion, that is correct. However, when were the books of the Bible established? Were they established by the Apostles? I realize that being uneducacted you may not recognize that the Apostles did not establish the books of the Bible and it was not until 325 at the Synod of Carthage that the Books were first discussed as to what should be in the Bible. This was confirmed in 381 by the Bishops of the Church. Yet, the Apostles did write against abortion in the didache in approxiamtely 50 to 60ad, when the Church moved from Jerusalem to Antioch. It dealt with it directly and not in a round about way. Chapter two verse two is my point of reference in the Didache. That is why oppostion to abortion goes back to the Apostles and the Catholic Church today says in section 2272 of the Catechism "Cooperation with abortion is automatic excommunication.." So recognize that the Apostles wrote against abortion and the Church today opposes abortion. You see one can not advocate, support abortion and be a Christian. One in short has already walked away from Christ. I hope that you can recognize that by being a proabortion advocate you are not a Christian. This is the teaching of the Apostles and the Church.
Welcome aboard.ScottMarian said:Dear Perry:
I recognize that you may not be aware of all of the writings of the Apostles. You state that the Bible does not deal directly with abortion, that is correct. However, when were the books of the Bible established? Were they established by the Apostles? I realize that being uneducacted you may not recognize that the Apostles did not establish the books of the Bible and it was not until 325 at the Synod of Carthage that the Books were first discussed as to what should be in the Bible. This was confirmed in 381 by the Bishops of the Church. Yet, the Apostles did write against abortion in the didache in approxiamtely 50 to 60ad, when the Church moved from Jerusalem to Antioch. It dealt with it directly and not in a round about way. Chapter two verse two is my point of reference in the Didache. That is why oppostion to abortion goes back to the Apostles and the Catholic Church today says in section 2272 of the Catechism "Cooperation with abortion is automatic excommunication.." So recognize that the Apostles wrote against abortion and the Church today opposes abortion. You see one can not advocate, support abortion and be a Christian. One in short has already walked away from Christ. I hope that you can recognize that by being a proabortion advocate you are not a Christian. This is the teaching of the Apostles and the Church.
galenrox said:Is there any foundation for your opinion? If so, what is it. If there is no foundation, what validates your opinion in the face of the research findings of biologists, scientists, fetologists, genetecists, and other professionals which completely disagrees with you?Fetuses (fetii?) cease to develop once subjected to air. That's not life in my opinion.This statement is incorrect. In the US, an abortion on demand may performed at any time up to the moment of natural birth. There is absolutely no time, or other restraint. You may wish to do a google search on the words 'partial birth abortion'.You in the real world where you don't need science, you just need religious belief to form fact? I don't know if you've looked up on things recently, but as far as fetuses go there's a thing called viability, after which abortions are now illegal.Considered is simply another word for "opinion". Where is the fact? You use the expression, "my personal belief". Again, where is the fact?This would of course leave a time called previability, before the fetus can continue to develop outside of its mother's womb. At that point it is not considered a human and not considered alive, legally speaking, at that is also my personal belief, and many others's personal beliefs.And every four years, about half of the nation turns out to be on the wrong side of an election; so what does the opinion or belief of half the population prove?And you know that over half the nation is pro-choice according to US News and World Report (I'm pretty sure, I'll check it out), so thus you are the one in a minority fringe group on this,Since you say you have science on your side, kindly lay out your scientific proof which justifies the aborting of nearly fifty million children since Roe v. Wade.while we in the real world consider science to be important instead of emotional boo hooing.
If you are unable to furnish scientific proof, then you will be stuck with plain, old, unfounded personal opinion, won't you?
ScottMarian said:Dear Perry:
I recognize that you may not be aware of all of the writings of the Apostles. You state that the Bible does not deal directly with abortion, that is correct. However, when were the books of the Bible established? Were they established by the Apostles? I realize that being uneducacted you may not recognize that the Apostles did not establish the books of the Bible and it was not until 325 at the Synod of Carthage that the Books were first discussed as to what should be in the Bible. This was confirmed in 381 by the Bishops of the Church. Yet, the Apostles did write against abortion in the didache in approxiamtely 50 to 60ad, when the Church moved from Jerusalem to Antioch. It dealt with it directly and not in a round about way. Chapter two verse two is my point of reference in the Didache. That is why oppostion to abortion goes back to the Apostles and the Catholic Church today says in section 2272 of the Catechism "Cooperation with abortion is automatic excommunication.." So recognize that the Apostles wrote against abortion and the Church today opposes abortion. You see one can not advocate, support abortion and be a Christian. One in short has already walked away from Christ. I hope that you can recognize that by being a proabortion advocate you are not a Christian. This is the teaching of the Apostles and the Church.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?