Earlier you wrote this bit of nonsense,"Why would you ignore six years of GOPs fundraising off of impeaching Obama.
Funderaising off of Birtherism and now suing the President.
And then defend the Blatant Irrational Liar Boehner when he says Impeachment is off the table.
Boehner has no idea what's on the table .
But it does make sense overall.
I don't blame you for not responding to it .
Let me parse it:
1. "Why would you ignore six years of GOPs fundraising off of impeaching Obama."
In your opinion how is this related to my statement, "The leadership of one party, the Democratic party, is [pure evil]. The followers are sheep"?
And who, specifically in the party [leadership] is raising funds by making the legitimate case for impeaching the fascist in the White House?
2. "Funderaising off of Birtherism and now suing the President."
In your opinion how is this related to my statement, "The leadership of one party, the Democratic party, is [pure evil]. The followers are sheep"?
And who, specifically in the party [leadership] is "funderaising off of birtherism"?
3. "And then defend the Blatant Irrational Liar Boehner when he says Impeachment is off the table."
In your opinion how is this related to my statement, "The leadership of one party, the Democratic party, is [pure evil]. The followers are sheep"?
And what do you think this near sentence means?