• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pete Hegseth suggests he would disobey court ruling against deploying military in LA

The next Democratic President is gonna have to send masked agents to arrest a bunch of people in Trump's administration for breaking our laws.
 
Alas I know a tongue tied poster when I see one.

Another who has no answer to PutinMagasTrump. Never has had an answer to 'em. Rejecting the wrong people is worse yet.
Your posts have no clue of the military culture of the American armed forces -- since 1775, not since January 2025. Your posts don't know the military oath to the Constitution from a recipe.

Your posts don't know loyalty, the military oath, the Constitution. Your posts find every which way but loose to lose. They are fierce about submitting to defeat. Your posts contribute nothing to preserving democracy. They instead lay out the red carpet to PutinMagasTrump. Your posts are the MAGA effect.

Your posts are fantasy gibberish. 🦄
 
It's fair to wonder whether he would control the national guard if he decided to order them to do things that a court order told them they had no right to order.

There's no obligation for the guard to obey the presidents orders if the president doesn't have the legal authority to issue them.

Do you think they, individually, know that? The legal aspects of each of his proclamations see-saw back and forth too. And then consider that their loyalty, bias, etc will enter into their decisions.

They are trained to obey, period. It's more up to their officers. And again, TACO has been very clear on how he's handling anything less than 100% loyalty. There will always be some aligned with him...and he'll handpick compliant, loyal officers and he will order them as he chooses. Some may refuse...but not all. This is not a "new" autocrat playbook. He's had 4 years to stew and study and it's obvious he has people supporting and encouraging him.
 
Your posts are fantasy gibberish. 🦄
Alas I know rote recitation in lieu of no reply when I see it. This reply in particular repeated several times suggests spamming. Junk posting. This is because posts critical of yours cannot be disputed articulately.
 
Alas I know rote recitation in lieu of no reply when I see it. This reply in particular repeated several times suggests spamming. Junk posting. This is because posts critical of yours cannot be disputed articulately.

Your posts are fantasy gibberish. 🦄 Mine is all laid out coherently to others.
 
They are trained to obey, period. It's more up to their officers. And again, TACO has been very clear on how he's handling anything less than 100% loyalty. There will always be some aligned with him...and he'll handpick compliant, loyal officers and he will order them as he chooses. Some may refuse...but not all. This is not a "new" autocrat playbook. He's had 4 years to stew and study and it's obvious he has people supporting and encouraging him.
Projection.

Trump would have done your formula by now if he could do it. He cannot. This is because there are no "compliant, loyal" to Trump officers.

Your posts are a fail when it comes to the armed forces, their oath and the Constitution -- which your posts cannot refute. You haven't ever seen the military oath to the Constitution. Further, Trump has no one in the Pentagon "supporting and encouraging him." This is grossly erroneous nonsense about the armed forces chiefs and commanders at home and abroad.

The active duty armed forces have refused to do Trump's "mass deportation" which btw is why it's a bust. Only the armed forces can do a "mass deportation" on the madman scale Trump dreams of. And the active duty armed forces won't do it. Neither will the active duty armed forces do Trump's wet dream "roundup" of his "enemies within" liberals. No, not.

The CA NG case is in the courts and Trump is going to win the case. This is many months away to find out what happens when Trump orders Blue state NG out to militarize their Blue cities and state. It's reasonable to note that we will find out then a lot about how wrong your posts are about the armed forces.
 
Your posts are fantasy gibberish. 🦄 Mine is all laid out coherently to others.
You won't post your nonsense to me directly. So I am going directly to your every post that misrepresents the armed forces chiefs and commanders at the Pentagon, across the USA and abroad. I am hammering on the fact the Generalissimo hasn't anyone loyal or subservient to him in the command structure of the armed forces at home and abroad. If the Generalissimo could have found such people they would be the chiefs and commanders right now and by now. NOT.
 

Pete Hegseth suggests he would disobey court ruling against deploying military in LA​

The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, suggested on Wednesday that he would not obey a federal court ruling against the deployments of national guard troops and US marines to Los Angeles, the latest example of the Trump administration’s willingness to ignore judges it disagrees with.

This is sufficient grounds for his immediate removal. Clearly, he is a terrorist.

He’s going to find himself in Levenworth
 

Pete Hegseth suggests he would disobey court ruling against deploying military in LA​

The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, suggested on Wednesday that he would not obey a federal court ruling against the deployments of national guard troops and US marines to Los Angeles, the latest example of the Trump administration’s willingness to ignore judges it disagrees with.

This is sufficient grounds for his immediate removal. Clearly, he is a terrorist.


Unless LA is attacked by sleeper cells over the Iran issue.
I would not be surprised if Hegseth were to try to "teach Los Angeles a lesson".
 
Projection.

Trump would have done your formula by now if he could do it. He cannot. This is because there are no "compliant, loyal" to Trump officers.

Your posts are a fail when it comes to the armed forces, their oath and the Constitution -- which your posts cannot refute. You haven't ever seen the military oath to the Constitution. Further, Trump has no one in the Pentagon "supporting and encouraging him." This is grossly erroneous nonsense about the armed forces chiefs and commanders at home and abroad.

The active duty armed forces have refused to do Trump's "mass deportation" which btw is why it's a bust. Only the armed forces can do a "mass deportation" on the madman scale Trump dreams of. And the active duty armed forces won't do it. Neither will the active duty armed forces do Trump's wet dream "roundup" of his "enemies within" liberals. No, not.

The CA NG case is in the courts and Trump is going to win the case. This is many months away to find out what happens when Trump orders Blue state NG out to militarize their Blue cities and state. It's reasonable to note that we will find out then a lot about how wrong your posts are about the armed forces.


Your posts are fantasy gibberish. 🦄 Mine is all laid out coherently to others.
 
You won't post your nonsense to me directly. So I am going directly to your every post that misrepresents the armed forces chiefs and commanders at the Pentagon, across the USA and abroad. I am hammering on the fact the Generalissimo hasn't anyone loyal or subservient to him in the command structure of the armed forces at home and abroad. If the Generalissimo could have found such people they would be the chiefs and commanders right now and by now. NOT.


Your posts are fantasy gibberish. 🦄 Mine is all laid out coherently to others.
 
Back
Top Bottom