• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pete Hegseth suggests he would disobey court ruling against deploying military in LA

ColdHardTruth said:

Pete Hegseth suggests he would disobey court ruling against deploying military in LA​

The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, suggested on Wednesday that he would not obey a federal court ruling against the deployments of national guard troops and US marines to Los Angeles, the latest example of the Trump administration’s willingness to ignore judges it disagrees with.

This is sufficient grounds for his immediate removal. Clearly, he is a terrorist.

Click to expand...

The courts have no say in troop deployment.

Seditionist judges have no authority.
 
Roadvirus said:
Um...Haggis? Yeah...the whole SCOTUS/Presidential immunity thing doesn't apply to Cabinet members.

Just thought you should know.
Click to expand...

ROFL

DP Comrades think Article II reads;

The executive Power shall be vested in district courts and unelected judges who shall be commanders of the armed forces. A president may carry out the orders given by the dictatorship of the judiciary once permission is begged from each and every inferior court in the nation. This provision shall be in force only while Republicans hold the presidency.

But then, you've never actually read the Constitution, have you?
 
ColdHardTruth said:

Pete Hegseth suggests he would disobey court ruling against deploying military in LA​

The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, suggested on Wednesday that he would not obey a federal court ruling against the deployments of national guard troops and US marines to Los Angeles, the latest example of the Trump administration’s willingness to ignore judges it disagrees with.

This is sufficient grounds for his immediate removal. Clearly, he is a terrorist.

Click to expand...
Of course he would.
Did anyone see Congressman Jason Crow rip Hegseth a new one during his testimony before Congress?
Now that guy is a patriot. And not a weird MAGA one.

 
Lursa said:
Good luck with that. He controls the military...even impeaching him wont "necessarily" remove him from office and then we'd have mini-me.

TACO isnt asking Congress for a damn thing anymore, he's ruling by EO. The DOJ is completely doing his bidding.
Click to expand...
The Republican controlled house will not impeach trump and the Republican controlled Senate wouldn't convict him.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
ROFL

The fantasies of the democrat traitors is hilarious.

Yes, the Stalinists will use the clout of 11% approval to stage a coup...
Click to expand...
You're on the ball today. Nice double-dip, traitors and stalinists? The right has become a never ending source of hatred towards anyone who doesn't support trump.
 
Trump's cabinet is the least qualified ever except in one respect: Loyalty to Trump uber alles.
 
ColdHardTruth said:
The military WILL NOT support this behavior. When the time comes, they will do the right thing.
Click to expand...
Yes.

It needs however to get even worse to bring the liberals around who are in mortal fear of a military action of state. That is, those few liberals who can even conceive of the action in the USA.

The military needs the support of the liberals who are still talking about the '26 midterms and winning the House as if that would blow off the 100 million-plus MAGAs in the 50 states. Liberals keep talking about the "right" Democratic party nominee in 2028 -- as if Trump will ever again allow or accept a free and fair election which he and Miller know already is a done deal of never again.

What's unique about a USA military action of state is that it will be civilian led and controlled by those civilians who remain loyal and faithful to the Constitution. Leaders of the new temporary government will be mostly civilians loyal to the Constitution. More liberals need to stop clutching their pearls against the military that is in fact holding its own against Trump to date.
 
Tangmo said:
Yes.

It needs however to get even worse to bring the liberals around who are in mortal fear of a military action of state. That is, those few liberals who can even conceive of the action in the USA.

The military needs the support of the liberals who are still talking about the '26 midterms and winning the House as if that would blow off the 100 million-plus MAGAs in the 50 states. Liberals keep talking about the "right" Democratic party nominee in 2028 -- as if Trump will ever again allow or accept a free and fair election which he and Miller know already is a done deal of never again.
Click to expand...
It's only about 70 million MAGAS. While this is way too many, they are not the majority.
Tangmo said:
What's unique about a USA military action of state is that it will be civilian led and controlled by those civilians who remain loyal and faithful to the Constitution. Leaders of the new temporary government will be mostly civilians loyal to the Constitution. More liberals need to stop clutching their pearls against the military that is in fact holding its own against Trump to date.
Click to expand...
Those who remain loyal to the constitution are not MAGA. MAGA doesn't follow the law. They have no respect for the law.

Meanwhile, I agree with you. We need to have faith in the military.
 
Lursa said:
Your posts are fantasy gibberish. 🦄
Click to expand...
Despite where we are too many liberals still have zero clue about the nature and character of the USA armed forces. This is why we are where we are with TrumpMiller running amok with their fascism. Liberal failure after liberal failure since 2015. Yet liberals fail even more each passing year. Your post to another poster displays this obliviously.
 
Tangmo said:
Despite where we are too many liberals still have zero clue about the nature and character of the USA armed forces. This is why we are where we are with TrumpMiller running amok with their fascism. Liberal failure after liberal failure since 2015. Yet liberals fail even more each passing year. Your post to another poster displays this obliviously.
Click to expand...

Lursa said:
Your posts are fantasy gibberish. 🦄
Click to expand...
 
ColdHardTruth said:

Pete Hegseth suggests he would disobey court ruling against deploying military in LA​

The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, suggested on Wednesday that he would not obey a federal court ruling against the deployments of national guard troops and US marines to Los Angeles, the latest example of the Trump administration’s willingness to ignore judges it disagrees with.

This is sufficient grounds for his immediate removal. Clearly, he is a terrorist.

Click to expand...
Well yeah and a judge attempting to usurp the authority of the executive branch should probably be arrested and very minimum removed from the bench. Executive decides true movements not the court.
 
ColdHardTruth said:
It's only about 70 million MAGAS. While this is way too many, they are not the majority.

Those who remain loyal to the constitution are not MAGA. MAGA doesn't follow the law. They have no respect for the law.

Meanwhile, I agree with you. We need to have faith in the military.
Click to expand...
There are more MAGAs than MAGA voters only. Many MAGAs still aren't registered to vote or just don't vote. Accordingly, I figure there's a hundred million MAGAs and maybe more.

Yes which is what I said. Everyone to include MAGAs especially know MAGAs hate the Constitution. Which is why I said those loyal to the Constitution. This standard excludes all MAGAs and every MAGA. I thought my statement and its underlying assumption had been obvious and clear. I would never say to include MAGAs in a civilian led military action of state to stop MAGAs destroying the country. It would be absurd for me to say that which is why I do not say it.

Yes but I'm afraid too many liberals continue to need to start at Square One with belief (in the military as the good guys who reject Putin-MAGAs-Trump). I'll just say that all of this and more suggests you'd need to up your state of play concerning my posts.
 
Lursa said:
The military has been groomed since Jan and also intimidated. See the firings he did right from the start. See: buh bye black head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 100% loyalty is demanded and there will be/is a substantial group that will obey.

If you think for a moment that they wont...you're not paying attention.

Is there also the potential for that actual, American, patriotic, committed military to push back against that? IMO yes...but that means violence.
Click to expand...
Your posts have no clue of the military culture of the American armed forces -- since 1775, not since January 2025. Your posts don't know the military oath to the Constitution from a recipe.

Your posts don't know loyalty, the military oath, the Constitution. Your posts find every which way but loose to lose. They are fierce about submitting to defeat. Your posts contribute nothing to preserving democracy. They instead lay out the red carpet to PutinMagasTrump. Your posts are the MAGA effect.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Well yeah and a judge attempting to usurp the authority of the executive branch should probably be arrested and very minimum removed from the bench. Executive decides true movements not the court.
Click to expand...
When it comes to policing US citizens with the military… who has that authority?
 
Lursa said:
Good luck with that. He controls the military...even impeaching him wont "necessarily" remove him from office and then we'd have mini-me.

TACO isnt asking Congress for a damn thing anymore, he's ruling by EO. The DOJ is completely doing his bidding.
Click to expand...

It's fair to wonder whether he would control the national guard if he decided to order them to do things that a court order told them they had no right to order.

There's no obligation for the guard to obey the presidents orders if the president doesn't have the legal authority to issue them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom