• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Pentagon Releases Video of Plane Hitting Pentagon

I am new here: I hold a strong interest in politcs and politcal disuccions and hope to enjoy this place. The 9-11 Pentagon conspiracy theory is one that I enjoy debunking with a passion, my thirst for knowledge related for aviation helping me to a degree by allowing me to do internet research on the 757 for myself especially in the context of this debate - uncommon for an almost-17 year old.

NonAmerican said:
4.) there is no airplane parts after the explotion

It'd be hard to see much from the angle, and with the quality of the footage, though you can make out the lawn geting sprinkled right in the vincinity of the explosion..

One question though to those who believe that it wasn't an airplane and a missile hit the Pentagon:

landinggear002.jpg


What missile needs landing gear ?

Sir_Alec:
Before the roof callapsed in the hole was about 14 by 12 feet. The body of a plane does not fit that hole.

The 757's fuselage, the same as the 707, and 727 aircraft on an un-related note, holds a diameter of 12ft 4in, which should fit in hole of that size, though not easily by any means.
 
Last edited:
Where did you get that picture? (of the landing gear) I'd be interested in looking at the website or wherever you got it from...
 
Spooky_Eyes said:
Where did you get that picture? (of the landing gear) I'd be interested in looking at the website or wherever you got it from...


I guess he not speaking...
 
Well, i go to Brevard Community College in FL, and my professor worked in that area of the pentagon, said something about it being fixed up or something, he left and then 4 years later or so the plane hit the building, but he was tellin me a story about how one of his old pals still worked in that area of the pent. And that on 9/11 his pal got a (cell phone call) from his wife she was on that plane. and She was talking to him AS it hit the building. His wife died man, i find it very rude to say things like this. I have done research on the 9/11 consp theories, i dont think you guys wll ever be happy. Do you also believe in the fake moon landing?
 
Rightwing86 said:
. Do you also believe in the fake moon landing?
Why, not...if the government really want to put a stop to that they would have give us the location on the moon, so we could go out and buy a telescope for wal-mart and look at were we landed…lol, but did they, no…
 
Loxd4 said:
Why, not...if the government really want to put a stop to that they would have give us the location on the moon, so we could go out and buy a telescope for wal-mart and look at were we landed…lol, but did they, no…

Actually....yes they did. We also regularly use equiptment left on the Moon for scientific measurements. The Government (read NASA) does not respond to the lunatic fringe because....well...its the Lunatic fringe.

We do have a couple Pics...taken from Clementine in orbit:

http://www.tass-survey.org/richmond/answers/lunar_lander.html#clem
 

Attachments

  • h_apollo_site_02.webp
    h_apollo_site_02.webp
    44.2 KB · Views: 5
tecoyah said:
Actually....yes they did. We also regularly use equiptment left on the Moon for scientific measurements. The Government (read NASA) does not respond to the lunatic fringe because....well...its the Lunatic fringe.

We do have a couple Pics...taken from Clementine in orbit:

http://www.tass-survey.org/richmond/answers/lunar_lander.html#clem

Common on man, arn't there any better pic of the landing besides some dotts?
 
You nuts never end do you? No wonder I have to press 1 for English when I call tech support.

Not one of you metallic headed freaks have ever answered where are all the people who boarded these so called missles went. Why do you all so ignorantly ignore that fact when people ask?

How can you ignore the flight manifests of flight 77 and the families that watched their loved ones board the plane?

Say whatever the hell you want about your government, but dont disrespect the people that died by claiming they didnt exsist.
 
Rightwing86 said:
Do you also believe in the fake moon landing?

There's a strong case to be made regarding whether or not man walked on the moon. In any case it be interesting to see someone go back.
 
talloulou said:
There's a strong case to be made regarding whether or not man walked on the moon.

If by this you mean that there is a strong case to say man did not walk on the moon, I've yet to see it. Shadows, radiation, heat, flags, dust, computer technology, I've heard them all before, and as they are debunked one by one, there is always someone new to come along and say "yeah, but what about the shadows" and so we start again.

Once again, I point to http://www.clavius.org/ which debunks most stuff, and http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/

talloulou said:
In any case it be interesting to see someone go back.

It would, but as what cost?
 
Pogostick said:
Any time I see a Rense link, I laugh. :mrgreen:

I think the pictures presented there should remain the center of focus, we can debate the credibility later... *gets an idea* :2razz:
 
Back
Top Bottom