A jet going roughly 850 feet per second caught on a normal security video camera can not be expected to capture much more than what has been seen.
You think the car moving in front of the camera may have seen or at least heard a Passenger Jet Plane descending at 850ft p/s, i also would have assumed that there would have been some cars from the free way right opposite the Pentagon that had been turned over by the force of a passenger jet descending at that speed, or at least some reported eye witness accounts from drivers that day, you report there were eye witness accounts of a plane but have failed to provide evidence of this claim.
I have not heard or followed any conspiracy theories on this but am confused to see how there could possibly be one.
So the video does not conclussively prove to many (if anything ever could prove to a die-hard conspiracy believer) that what struck the Pentagon was a plane?
There are many questions surrounding the truth about what happened in 9/11, the government has been far from open in the investigations into Al queada for instance "w1999", The legislation signed by George Bush to deny FBI agents investigating leads into a terrorist attack on the WTC.
The truth about 9/11 is that there was a conspiracy by the bush administration, the CIA and their middle eastern operative Osama Bin Laden to attack the american people and usher in new laws abolishing the constitutional rights of tthe American citizens.
What about the eye-witnesses who saw the plane strike the building?
I have not yet seen an eye witness account confirming that a plane hit the pentagon, why don't they just release the video footage from the garage directly in line with the projectiles tragectory, anything going into the pentagon would have been recorded from behind by these video cams, but nothing has been released.
What about the flight filled with people who never arrived at their destinations?
Was this flight one from Denver airport, if not which airport did it come from?
What about the FAA who was watching the flight?
What FAA who was watching the flight?
What about the military agencies/RADARS tracking the flight?
Yeah and why were the military jets not scrambled to intercept the plane, assuming the plane was hijacked where the official story tells us it was the air craft control would have lost contact with the plane for long enough to know that something was wrong, considering how strong Bush's ties to Bin Laden are i would be surprised if Bush had the commanders issue strict instructions that the attack was to be carried out.
What about the forensics? (If any)
Amazing this really, not one outright clear cut piece of plane wreckage but they have the DNA of all 73 passengers intact, B.S, i am no scientist but i find it hard to believe that 73 seperate peoples DNA woulld be distinguishable after supposedly flying at 850 ftp/s into a building and exploding, correct me if i'm wrong but this seems a little far fetched, even for me.
And that is a list of just a few of the hard-to-discredit points Conspiracy theorists have to overcome, none more daunting than the eye-witnesses interviewed afterwards, scattered over the area, who told of how they watched it hit.
Even if a plane did hit the pentagon, it should not deflect attention from the real fact that Bush's government had prior knowledge and in light of the evidence i have seen on the attack were in fact complicit, whether it was a plane, a strategic missile or a remote controlled drone it does not divert from the fact the CIA incorporating their middle eastern asset and his loyal troops propogated the worst attack in modern history.
